Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A lot of people have them, no doubt. It's all in the setup though.

not forgetting when Justin's results and opinions were made... majority of higher powered -5 turboed GT-R's are only coming around in the last couple of years. and even still now, most only get mid to high 300's...

Big dollar and R&D projects always get better results.

not forgetting when Justin's results and opinions were made... majority of higher powered -5 turboed GT-R's are only coming around in the last couple of years. and even still now, most only get mid to high 300's...

Big dollar and R&D projects always get better results.

No doubt. A mate in 05 had a -5, standard engines GTR making 300. That was considered a half decent result. Now it would be considered a joke. Setups, fuel, ECU's, exhaust sizes (a 3 inch IS NOT BIG ENOUGH) and possibly tuning methods have come along way!

I had trust T517z 10cms on my old engine/setup, completely stock engine made 370kw at 24psi, then popped a head gasket lol

Was laggy but when they came on Hang on !!

That setup has been sold, engines been forged and running a 6266 getting tuned on Friday, keen for results !

I had trust T517z 10cms on my old engine/setup, completely stock engine made 370kw at 24psi, then popped a head gasket lol

Was laggy but when they came on Hang on !!

That setup has been sold, engines been forged and running a 6266 getting tuned on Friday, keen for results !

The whole 'lethargic, but when it comes on.... HOLD ON' thing... Isn't that just turbos making the power they should, but being a nugget through the mid range?

Cars, power, times and not least, everyday performance all depend almost entirely on the seven P's. perfect prior planning prevents piss poor performance. I have used 5's on a dead stock 26. Wasn't particularly blown away. Buuuuut, when I started building and improving, they really started to shine. Would I have 5's again? You bet. Would I build a different way? You bet. For today's fuel quality and cost of performance parts for 26's, you'd be mad to not build a tough 26 and run it on Jew brew AND still look like a stock engine bay that can peel your eyelids off when you give it the nuts, because let's face it, the police these days are getting smarter, and the bullshart fines are also getting worse.

I've personally built big power 8's and after looking at graphs and seat of the pants, for a stock as ya nannas undies look with big block torque, can't really go past a 2.8 with a well sorted set of 5's and Jew brew.

he he he...

The garretts are a pretty good choice....

I ran my T517Z's 7 years ago- they were the best option for me at the time. No graph.

They may out perform on a dyno... but it's hard to argue with 138mph in a full weight r32. havn't seen many -5 cars run those sort of numbers on a stock motor in full trim?

I don't like -5's the same as I don't like 'itard- Apple' products....

Wasnt nitrous used when you ran 138mph?

The whole 'lethargic, but when it comes on.... HOLD ON' thing... Isn't that just turbos making the power they should, but being a nugget through the mid range?

Not really... the torque delivery, it's the way torque not the power multiplies and gives you that rush.

Wasnt nitrous used when you ran 138mph?

Yeah, I was shooting a very fatt 50hp (read, probably 25hp gain) shot to get me off the line. As much as anything it provided a consistent intake temp thus more consistent times between day and night. Call it 2mph at best.

Ok cool. No lag + nitrous = crazy

There is still lagg.... but your launching well within the torque curve.

There is no massive push from that sort of nitrous. It's more like driving on a cold day v's a hot day.

Nitrous is one of the most over rated yet least understood power 'adder'.

Funny how the same setup work for some and not for others

I had everything like you minus cams (but with cam gears ) and could only manage 370kw

That's with HPI 3" dumps, custom twin 3" into 3.5" front pipe, custom 3.5" cat back, arc front mount, etc etc !

stock head... drop in 260deg cams.

bone stock 15yo engine

bolt on turbo's, dumps, cooler/pipe work, rb20 afm's, PFC, fuel system on 98.

J.

Wow minimal mods nice work. What was you mph off nitrous?

Edited by Ryan1200

NOS was the number one mod in the fast and furious movie, yet 12 years later and its the least used mod, it's pretty amazing that hardly anyone uses it. I think E85 and billet turbos outperforms it by far interms of reliability and price.

^This 34 made 842rwkw with Nos and 963rwkw without ..lol

I just bought a car yesterday with 10cm units fitted, will be interesting to see how I like them as my last Gtr had -5's. Justin you would know the car, silver, jun engine bits, built in Hobart......

Is that a stroker ? I would imagine these turbos to be perfectly suited to a 2.7/2.7L etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did and sync timing with light 
    • Have you done the Ignition Sync Wizard in the AEM software?
    • Find out what RPM it was idling at with the IACV unplugged. It's very weird that the rpm didn't change at all, and then it stalled. When it stalls is it nearly like a switch off, like you've turned the engine off? Or is it more stutters and sputters and coughs to death over a few seconds? Or does the RPM just slowly keep going down and down? Have you done a test of trying to start it with the AFM unplugged? Does it still die?     If you Follow Josh's advice on using Nistune to check the voltages (which is a perfect method!) if you see anything out of wack voltage wise, THEN get the multimeter out and read the voltage directly at the sensor. If the two vary, then you're now looking for a wiring issue vs a sensor issue. So be aware, what the ECU sees, may not be what the sensor is actually saying too...
    • You very likely need to get it on a dyno and tune it. My assumption is, you've got an RB25DET tune in it, which has a different manifold, different injectors, and different cams as a minimum. What O2 sensor are you running?   When you say it runs extremely rich from idle all the way to redline, is this just free revving it you see that?
    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
×
×
  • Create New...