Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 205
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Firstly, LOL at pretty much all the posts since my last

But secondly, i now understand how to play caravan, but still dont understand why you can wage 5000 caps and when u win u only get about 240 :S

anyone able to explain this?

i never said you was gay.. and wut gf.. i never mentioned gf

yea you did, in the screenshot....

and yea you did mention my gf, before you edited your post and changed to my mum....

craig, your a fat jerk

Firstly, LOL at pretty much all the posts since my last

But secondly, i now understand how to play caravan, but still dont understand why you can wage 5000 caps and when u win u only get about 240 :S

anyone able to explain this?

Yeah, cause the AI player only bets a certain amount, even if you raid it 5k.. Do you do the 7, 9 & 10 trick?

WOAH....WOAH....WOAH.....WOAH......WOAH BACK UP ONE SEC!

There is some sort of download shit on the PS3 that lets you continue playing Fallout 3 after the finish of the game?!?!??!!?

Yeah there are 5 add-on packs.. at least for Xbox & PC..

Point Lookout - A whole new island you get on a boat and takes you there

Mothership Zeta - Invesigate aliens

Operation Anchorage - Takes you back in a Virtual Machine to a war, also end rebroad minded person of that opens a door with awesome armour and a sword

Into The Pitt - Travel to Pittsburgh

Broken Steel - Extends the game after you die, you wake up instead and join the brotherhood of steel to finish of the enclave

Bonus with Broken steel is that it raises max level to 30.. Even if you start the game again

I traded my FO3 in for the Game of the Year edition.. Which includes all 5 add-ons..

Did you buy it or did you aquire it?

Shit Computer is shit

bought it

i run it at ultra graphics with no bloom or hdr and a couple of other things, and it runs just as slow on the lowest settings...

its playable but, yea just buggy and non consistent fps is annoying

stop using XP then you shitkunt lol.

runs fine with everything turned up for me w/ 4x AA and AF on ultra high quality settings.

that said it still has memory leaks ffs

Yeah, takes some time with 6GB RAM though

You can't run ultra graphics in XP, it's not an option.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...