Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So basically as per description my xanavi shat itsself on me today.

Music was playing and screen was operating as per normal with the car in park. I then switched the drive and bingo, no music, screen went blank, however maintained power. I have since taken the battery terminal off to remove all power from getting to the screen as the screen would stay on even with the car turned off and no key in ignition. After re-attaching the terminals, the screen stays black(no power to it) however i can hear it trying to operate the disc.

It still wont eject the disc, and unfortunately i cant get the xanavi unit out because one of the screws holding the player to the bracket has been well rounded by some previous owner.

Any ideas?

Could it be a fuse? etc

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/324496-xanavi-problem/
Share on other sites

To make it go black....I went from park( as i was parked and had just turned the car on- to reverse then to neutral then onto drive. Just like any other normal day. The air con still work's, but the screen is blank, although there was power still getting to the screen as the back lights were on.

Once I took the battery terminals off and put them back on... No power is getting to the screen.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/324496-xanavi-problem/#findComment-5288765
Share on other sites

Have you checked fuses? Might sound like a stupid question, but it's best to check the easiest, simplest things first.

Yeah mate i have. Nothing appears to be broken. I turned the car on this morning and magically it worked. I also had a two hour drive and its very random, will work for up to an hour and half then just shit itself and turn off...then might turn back on down the track. It's gota be the xanavi i think. Seems like it's confused with what's going on, ie when I manage to get a cd to eject, its telling me there is one in there and its loading.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/324496-xanavi-problem/#findComment-5289329
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So anyways, iv been putting up with it randomly working and not working. Seems to be a issue with power getting to the unit. sometimes its got power then sometimes it doesn't. So I would think its not a fuse, but just in case, what Fuse(s) actually control the unit? Goin to give all the power cords and what not a clean now see if that helps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/324496-xanavi-problem/#findComment-5343968
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...