Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all, this is more a "just curious" topic, but i purchased a car (havnt picked it up yet) and the car has a 3.5 inch zorst with a stock turbo, now in the past ive had a 3 inch zorst on the same system and found it enough, but will 3.5 inch be worse for the performance of the car? to me it seems like there wouldnt be enough back pressure.

Anyway, i guess the MAIN question is, how much of a drop in perfomance will there be with this exhaust? should i invest in a 3inch?

stock PSI to BTW

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/
Share on other sites

It will not hinder performance.

EPA issues however are most likely.

sound or pollution?

An exhaust CAN'T be 'to big' UNLESS you are going to give the exhaust 'to Big Al, your mate'.

Otherwise it is 'too big'.

But in this case, it isn't.

:P

i dont get it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306028
Share on other sites

sound or pollution?

i dont get it

Lol. 'to' and 'too' - two (hehe) different words.

The problem will be with volume, but I wouldn't worry about it (unless you get defected).

The size shouldn't make any difference to emissions as long as there is still a cat.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306048
Share on other sites

Lol. 'to' and 'too' - two (hehe) different words.

The problem will be with volume, but I wouldn't worry about it (unless you get defected).

The size shouldn't make any difference to emissions as long as there is still a cat.

no i don want to take the cat out, srsly, i dont want the extra 500rwkw from taking the cat out, its just to fast for me, so ill leave it in.

i was under the impression that you need some sort of back pressure, but iono

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306058
Share on other sites

no i don want to take the cat out, srsly, i dont want the extra 500rwkw from taking the cat out, its just to fast for me, so ill leave it in.

i was under the impression that you need some sort of back pressure, but iono

I believe the extra 500rwkw will make it too fast for you.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306088
Share on other sites

turbo engines are rather different to natro engines when it comes to exhaust requirements. as has been said, you won't notice any difference between a 3" and 3.5" system. if it was on a NA car, then it would be a totally different story

ok, good thanks! :P

i dont realy care about the size, i just didnt want it to be any worse than a 3 inch, which i beleive is optimal for a stock turbo.

I believe the extra 500rwkw will make it too fast for you.

is that all you picked up? lol what about - don, srsly or iono, but its good to see u picked up a missing "o"

cheers mate :angry:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306102
Share on other sites

As far as I'm concerned any of those 'made up' internet slang words mean you are speaking another language.

But mix up your 'to, too, two' or 'you're, your' etc while attempting English and it's just plain slack. :P

But srsly, your exhaust is fine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306173
Share on other sites

As far as I'm concerned any of those 'made up' internet slang words mean you are speaking another language.

But mix up your 'to, too, two' or 'you're, your' etc while attempting English and it's just plain slack. :P

But srsly, your exhaust is fine.

hehe ok cheers mate

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306181
Share on other sites

It won't decrease performance, on engines with forced induction the less exhaust restriction the better.

My 33 had a 3.5" system with a stock turbo and very few mods and it was pretty damn loud (didn't have a cat or any mufflers bar the cannon though), did sound mint but.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306751
Share on other sites

Provided you have control of the fueling and timing it shouldn't be a problem , noise and cops aside .

The theory is that the best exhaust is no exhaust behind a turbocharger which obviously isn't going to cut it in a road car .

The turbo rally people like to start out big behind the turbo and step down in stages on the way to the back . What this is said to do is maintain gas speed in the exhaust system as the gas cools and contracts so to speak .

Its a way of having a large volume behind the systems chief restriction , all gasses are channelled and accelerated into the turbine housing , so the red hot gasses have room to expand into . The way to drive the turbine is to have hot gas at speed on one side and a large volume to spread out into on the other side .

As the gas cools it wants to slow down if the exhaust tract is the same all the way to the back , if it slows down too much you can have reversion issues if say the turbo/exhaust manifold/ports/valves/cams are sized to make high rev grunt .

So , the way to keep it moving is to step the tube size down in stages so that the gasses maintain some momentum and velocity .

My old dinosaur Subaru RX Turbo (1.8L 2 valve tiny port flat four GT2554R turbo) has a 3" tube from the turbo to the back of the gearbox and 2 1/2 from there . Its surprisingly quiet but both mufflers are in the 2 1/2 section behind the 3" cat .

It still has its AM radio tech computer and suffers no reversion crap/no pops spits OR drones anywhere .

I suggest that if you have to do something to reduce noise start at the back , its the cheapest easiest way that gives the least restriction in an exhaust system . Car manufacturers having been doing precisely this for some years now .

A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5307360
Share on other sites

Provided you have control of the fueling and timing it shouldn't be a problem , noise and cops aside .

The theory is that the best exhaust is no exhaust behind a turbocharger which obviously isn't going to cut it in a road car .

The turbo rally people like to start out big behind the turbo and step down in stages on the way to the back . What this is said to do is maintain gas speed in the exhaust system as the gas cools and contracts so to speak .

Its a way of having a large volume behind the systems chief restriction , all gasses are channelled and accelerated into the turbine housing , so the red hot gasses have room to expand into . The way to drive the turbine is to have hot gas at speed on one side and a large volume to spread out into on the other side .

As the gas cools it wants to slow down if the exhaust tract is the same all the way to the back , if it slows down too much you can have reversion issues if say the turbo/exhaust manifold/ports/valves/cams are sized to make high rev grunt .

So , the way to keep it moving is to step the tube size down in stages so that the gasses maintain some momentum and velocity .

My old dinosaur Subaru RX Turbo (1.8L 2 valve tiny port flat four GT2554R turbo) has a 3" tube from the turbo to the back of the gearbox and 2 1/2 from there . Its surprisingly quiet but both mufflers are in the 2 1/2 section behind the 3" cat .

It still has its AM radio tech computer and suffers no reversion crap/no pops spits OR drones anywhere .

I suggest that if you have to do something to reduce noise start at the back , its the cheapest easiest way that gives the least restriction in an exhaust system . Car manufacturers having been doing precisely this for some years now .

A .

thanks for the info, very helpful, so with the 3.5 system in there with stock dump and front pipe, its not helping it i assume haha, but i will invest in a 3 inch bellmouth for the dump/front.

i dont have an issue with sound at all, its quite quiet actualy...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5307384
Share on other sites

so ive heard

What im wondering will a 3 inch dump/front pipe into 2 3/4 catback be aiight..is there any real point buying a whole system for 1/4 of an inch?

Or will i be captain sloooow.........

the only place you may lose some power is high up in the revs. general driving around and even just reving up to around 5000rpm probably won't make a scrap of difference. anything above that i think you would have to put it on a dyno to see the difference in power. don't think you'd notice the power when driving it. if you were aiming for 250kw+ then it might be worth going 3" though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5307439
Share on other sites

so if you were after more responsive midrange power the 3.5" exhaust is too large, is that what people are saying?

I was told by a tuner that a 2.5" custom made exhaust would be better than my 3.5" hks, this is what I was told when I told him I wanted to get a tune done for a HKS2835 with supporting mods...

I did say I was after good midrange response, and that I was not interested in ultimate peak power.

I didnt know wheather to trust him or not?

this is on a 33gtst

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5308677
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...