Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Production :

Standard - 3,962

Vspec/Mspec - 7,338

N1 - 45

By Year:

1999 - 5536

2000 - 1859

2001 - 2197

2002 - 1775

2003 - 2

Total Production: 12,175

but you have to minus a few because of people smashing them to an unrepairable state.

ill post somemore info after i find the website that i need.

edit : oh and the search button is not an enemy

they were probably build forthe sake of going into the museum.

well i got the info.

V-Spec :

The V-spec is the flagship model of the GT-R range. to increase performance an active LSD controlled in conjunction by a viscous coupling is used.

To aid high speed stability and overall road handling stiffer suspension and aerodynamics parts were implemented.

Special front and rear diffusers were developed, the rear one constructed from carbon fibre.

Difference from Standard :

Brake air duct

Front diffuser

Rear carbon diffuser

Active LSD

ATTESA E-TS PRO

Hard suspension

V-Spec II :

bnr34_v-specii_rear.gif

The V-spec was replaced with the V-spec II on August 28th, 2000.

The original aluminium bonnet has been replaced by a carbon fibre item with NACA duct to aid engine cooling

Furthermore the interior trim is now realised in black cloth and the rear brake discs are now slightly bigger (same as the N1 version).

Due to revision of the colour line-up, the following light colours are so far available: Bayside Blue (#TV2), White (#QM1), and White Pearl (#QX1). Silver and black are also available, but yellow and red are not available any more.

Difference from V-spec :

Rear brake (N1 based brake caliper)

Aluminum sport pedal (Axcel, Brake, Cluth)

Trim colour (from gray to black)

Carbon bonnet with NACA duct

White repeater lense

Colour of center console

Add: White Pearl(#QX1), Sparkling Silver(#WV2)

Del: Lightning Yellow(#EV1), Active Red(#AR2), Sonic Silver(#KR4

M-Spec :

bnr34_m-spec.gifbnr34_m-spec_rear.gifbnr34_m-spec_trim.gif

The M-spec is an additional BNR34 GT-R model which has been on sale since May 8th, 2001.

It sports a set of new comfort-developed shocks (called "Ripple-Control"), leather trim, soft and fine grip steering wheel, and aluminium bonnet.

This car represents the luxury version of the GT-R with performance almost equal to the V-spec II.

A special colour has also been developed for this new model. It is called "Champagne-Gold"(Multi-Flex Colour) (#EY0).

Other colours in the line up besides the Champagne Gold (#EY0) include: Black Pearl Metallic (#GV1), Sparkling Silver (#WV2), and White Pearl (#QX1).

Because of the extensive time needed to complete the hand sewn leather trim interior, only a limited edition of 50 cars per month will be made.

Difference from V-specII :

Leather trim with gold stitch

Seat heater (Fr)

Ripple-Control shock absorber

Softened stabilizer

Softened steering wheel (Fine-grip type)

Aluminum bonnet (Option : Carbon bonnet)

Exclusive colour : Champagne-Gold (#EY0)

Did the M-Spec get the N1 engine???

its hard to find info on the N1 as there arnt many around but this is what i could find.

they only came in white with an unpainted carbon fibre bonnet.

n1vspec2.jpg

The N1 is a spartan race car, designed to participate in N1 races.

Special equipment :

Twin ball bearing metal turbo-chargers

Extra large, air-cooled engine oil cooler

The main equipment deleted from the GT-R V.spec II :

Rear intermittent wiper

Rear fog lamp

Remote control entry system

Passenger's seat vanity mirror

Clean air filter

AM/FM electronic radio and CD player (equipped with aerial and wiring loom.)

Glove box damper & glove box lamp

Super-fine hard coat paint.

Equipment changes to GT-R V.spec II

UV cutting insulation and front door green glass --> green glass

Side indicator lamp --> reflector

Colour coded electric folding door mirror mount & body --> painted black

Leather hand brake lever --> resin

Leather centre console lid --> resin

Full auto air conditioner --> heater, with outside temperature display

¤ The N1 does not have any manufacturer's options. Note: The transmission, rear differential and transfer box oil coolers are all made by Nismo. The intercooler's carbon air guide is a dealer option.

¤ The body is only available in white <#QM1> and the carbon fibre bonnet comes unpainted.

Did the M-Spec get the N1 engine???

i duno i saw the N1 while flipin thro the latest HPI GTR Special

Yes, it did. The M-Spec Nur, and the V-Spec II Nur both got the N1 balanced engine with N1 conrods, pistons and crank, topped off with the gold cam cover.

AnthonyK1 - theres a midnight purple R34 N1 for sale on www.carsales.com.au.

Powerplay in Syd recently had a NUR for sale - nice @$170K. For the $80K you could save on a 99 V Spec you'd have to have too much money to get it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...