Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

around 320-340hp would be a tough stab.

i didnt wanted to made new topic about this and what you think about non brand turbochargers? i saw it in a japanese yahoo auction maybe it is chines or other shit but its very chaeap and what you think does it work r33 rb25det? who has like that turbocharger? and results ? you can cheack pictures here

T4 RX7 T4 turbine flange A / R 0.60 TRIM-T 75 TRIM-C 62 ( there written that this is for rx7 but guess it work on skyline)

here is a pictures.

f907f04f9e7b.jpg

eb2f148c92f3.jpg

39044aaa2bdf.jpg

60aeb0581d8b.jpg

da1e2f00575e.jpg

新品 T4 RX7用 タービン 。 T4 RX7 new turbines. Trim-T 75 , A/R -T 1.15 , Trim-C 62 A/R- C 0.60 , タービンフランジ:T4 double Trim-T 75, A / R-T 1.15, Trim-C 62 A/R- C 0.60, Tabinfuranji

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/330253-rb25-turbo/#findComment-5366746
Share on other sites

Do some more turbo homework.

Turbos meant for rotaries, are not good on piston motors generally because of the turbine housing size.

That one is 1.15 A/R, the biggest you want for a street RB25 is .82, you'd be looking at least to 1,000rpm extra lag if not more.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/330253-rb25-turbo/#findComment-5366810
Share on other sites

Do some more turbo homework.

Turbos meant for rotaries, are not good on piston motors generally because of the turbine housing size.

That one is 1.15 A/R, the biggest you want for a street RB25 is .82, you'd be looking at least to 1,000rpm extra lag if not more.

Thank you your reply mate and what about like that description?

T70 Flange T3 Turbine A / R 0.71 TRIM-T 75 TRIM-C 52

新品 Super T70 タービン 。 New Super T70 turbine. Trim-T 75 , A/R -T 0.92 , Trim-C 52 A/R- C 0.71 ,タービンフランジ:T3 double Trim-T 75, A / R-T 0.92, Trim-C 52 A/R- C 0.71, Tabinfuranji: T3 double

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/330253-rb25-turbo/#findComment-5366825
Share on other sites

Its a 71mm To4B comp with 1.15 T04E turbine with back crop.

Its not good for any thing. The comp is too small for that sort of turbine, will create heaps of lag for little power.

Its not going to work well on a RB25det. Specially with cropped turine in a 1.15 A/R Turbine :) . lol it will feels like down grading back to NA.

We can build you some thing makes more power with heaps better response if interested.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/330253-rb25-turbo/#findComment-5367585
Share on other sites

Its a 71mm To4B comp with 1.15 T04E turbine with back crop.

Its not good for any thing. The comp is too small for that sort of turbine, will create heaps of lag for little power.

Its not going to work well on a RB25det. Specially with cropped turine in a 1.15 A/R Turbine ;) . lol it will feels like down grading back to NA.

We can build you some thing makes more power with heaps better response if interested.

Thanks for your answer mate and what about like that description? its small? or normall?

TD40 T25/T28 flange Turbine A / R 0.44 TRIM-T 76 TRIM-C 60

her is a pictures

c247f78dab65.jpg

dafa403115c6.jpg

6ab1f214251c.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/330253-rb25-turbo/#findComment-5369418
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...