Jump to content
SAU Community

Fav Jap Cars? Skyline, Fto, Supra, Silvia, Mr2, Soarer, S2000, Evo, Gto, Impreza, Nsx


Recommended Posts

hey got bored and thought id start a potentially contraversial thread. if ya's didnt own skylines what would you guys own?

if price wanst price wasnt a factor id have

0. daihatsu midget

1. Nsx

2. GTO

3. EVO

4. s2000

5. FTO

6. Supra

7. s15

8. Skyline r34 GT

9. Impreza

10. Mr2

11. Soarer

767. commadore

824. falcon

if price wasnt a factor you would rather an impreza over a lambo?

why are you on this forum if you think that lambo's are japenese cars? LoL

"Fav Jap Cars? Skyline, Fto, Supra, Silvia, Mr2, Soarer, S2000, Evo, Gto, Impreza, Nsx" is the topic name

my fav

pulsar GTIR

GTR R32 like femno's or rosco's

GTR R34 like aaron's

evo 8 MR in dark grey

silvia K - if I really wanted a turbo jap car and only had $2 to my bank acct

supra like nigels one, twin td05's or 06's

the R34 in 2f2f, minus the stupid nos purge vents

Technically the GTO

Mitsubishi aren't Japanese anymore?

And slinky, seriously, an FTO before a Supra?!!

You totally lost me there. FTO's have to be the most 'orrible piece of shit ever to come of of Nippon.

For me it would be (off the top of my head with only a few minutes to think about it):

1. P510 2 door

2. R34 Nur

3. R34 V-Spec

4. R33 GTR

5. R32 GTR

6. Evo 10

7. FD RX7

8. NSX

9. Supra MK IV Targa

10. GTiR Pulsar

a GTO is more Dodge than Mitsi IMHO. Japan just built the thing for american use and happened to sell some locally as GTO.

Would you consider the R32 GTR an australian car? cos they sold 100 of em here.

Funkymonkey- GTO's are just as much of a Jap Import as the FTO's, as to whether Mitsubishi is still Japanese owned, I think they are....well at least I haven't heard otherwise.

Also the Midget, Commodore and the Falcon were gag items. I would rather shoot myself in the foot then drive a Commodore or Falcon....and I think I'd be to tall to fit in a midget.

Cowboy- the Supra's really need the turbo to do anything special. N/A Supra VS NA FTO (because they didn't come out with Turbo's, there NA with 150kw power)

I'll explain my choice:

* Love the stylish curves of the FTO

* Technologically advanced for it's day

* handles like it's on rails

*Amazing turning circle

*All auto's were brought out as a tiptronic from 1994 (the first production year of the FTO)

*Driver orientated cabin

*Large comfy bolsted seats, so it holds you in around corners

*lots of hidden comparments/ cheeky little extras (as most Jap cars do)

*MIVEC engine so it really makes use of every single drop of power

*(fto)2lt 150kw NA Engine in a 1170kg car with a short wheelbase and an option for a semi auto in 1994!!! as opposed to a 3lt 168kw larger car that weighs 1480kg and looks more dated

SUPRA's

*Dislike the crazy cockpit style of the cabin (I never wanted to be a pilot)

*Not a big fan of the dated looking dash/instrument cluster

*Na version is a slug

*dislike the odd bubble shape of the rear window

*It's a true 2+2 with a totally unusable centre seat

I have a link to a Utube video that I think you might like :bunny: (it involves a Toyota Levin GT-Z, Honda Integra Si, Nissan 180SX, Toyota MR2, BMW M3 and a Toyota Supra.

http://www.youtube.com/user/BrentTheAussie.../14/iTiXnCFT9cY

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

However don't get me wrong, I love the Supra's but for what they are you don't really get value for money or something REALLY unique, I like being different (hence why I own a Jap car and not a Hyundai Getz)

anyway as i said... favorite and im a female im happy with cars that get to 100kmph in under 7.5 seconds, i dont take my car to the track.

Edited by slinky-minky
The FTO is front wheel drive... Torque steer. D'oh...

fto's are high revving and not ultra tourqey so theres only a little bit between 1st and second

I understand most of this is your opinion, and not fact, but I feel the need to defend the humble NA Supra anyway.

Cowboy- the Supra's really need the turbo to do anything special. Not true. They're never going to be the best at anything, but they have more than enough power to learn how to drive a FR on the track, drift, drag, whatever.

I'll explain my choice:

* Love the stylish curves of the FTO

* Technologically advanced for it's day

* handles like it's on rails - Supra's handle really well too, in fact, stock for stock an RZ Supra will beat an R33 GTR around the track.

*Amazing turning circle

*All auto's were brought out as a tiptronic from 1994 (the first production year of the FTO) - Still auto

*Driver orientated cabin - Dunno why you don't like the Supra if you like this feature. It's arguably THE most driver orientated cabin of any Jap import.

*Large comfy bolsted seats, so it holds you in around corners

*lots of hidden comparments/ cheeky little extras (as most Jap cars do)

*MIVEC engine so it really makes use of every single drop of power - How? You mean the fact you have to wring its neck to get power out of it? Supra has some decent torque down low.

*(fto)2lt 150kw NA Engine in a 1170kg car with a short wheelbase and an option for a semi auto in 1994!!! as opposed to a 3lt 168kw larger car that weighs 1480kg and looks more dated - Again your opinion, but I think most of the world would agree the Supra looks 10x better than the FTO

SUPRA's

*Dislike the crazy cockpit style of the cabin (I never wanted to be a pilot)

*Not a big fan of the dated looking dash/instrument cluster - I'll agree with this

*Na version is a slug - It is significantly quicker than the FTO. My Supra puts out 150rwkw with minimal mods. Which is enough to beat stock GTSTs and Silvias

*dislike the odd bubble shape of the rear window - No idea what you're talking about here, I just looked at a couple of pictures and the FTO and Supra have very similar rear windows.

*It's a true 2+2 with a totally unusable centre seat I'd actually call it a 2+1, I won't let anyone sit behind me.

comparing a stock fto to a stock NA supra the fto would be faster in a drag race and on the track. theres mods for the fto also like the whole intake, extractors and exhaust system and there piggyback computers.

heres a picture of a stock white FTO http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=htt...=1t:429,r:0,s:0

heres a picture of a stock white Supra http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=htt...tx=77&ty=82

is it just me or does the fto look 10 times better?

comparing a stock fto to a stock NA supra the fto would be faster in a drag race and on the track. theres mods for the fto also like the whole intake, extractors and exhaust system and there piggyback computers.

heres a picture of a stock white FTO http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=htt...=1t:429,r:0,s:0

heres a picture of a stock white Supra http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=htt...tx=77&ty=82

is it just me or does the fto look 10 times better?

Uh, that's an FTO with a bodykit, rims and tinted windows. I still think it looks worse though.

I also looked at several sites, here's one:

http://www.importforums.com/carsinfo.htm

NA Supra is more than a second quicker to 100kph and down the 1/4mile than the FTO GPX.

Uh, that's an FTO with a bodykit, rims and tinted windows. I still think it looks worse though.

I also looked at several sites, here's one:

http://www.importforums.com/carsinfo.htm

NA Supra is more than a second quicker to 100kph and down the 1/4mile than the FTO GPX.

thats a mitsubishi factory bodykit by the way, and yeah it seems going by that site the na supra's are faster in a straight line

Cowboy- the Supra's really need the turbo to do anything special. N/A Supra VS NA FTO (because they didn't come out with Turbo's, there NA with 150kw power)

Who said anything about a non-turbo Supra? :D

And the GTO is made by a Japanese company in Japan.

Is the GTO Pontiac an Australian car or American car? It's Australian. Designed and built here then exported overseas.

The R32 is Japanese. Made in Japan then exported here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...