Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I've been doing some thinking for some upgrades/mods to my 1997 sII 33.

Below is a list of what I'd like to put in the car but im not sure if ill need anything else. I could be completely off with what I've put down. I want a bit more power but mainly prefer looks vs power. I like all the cool gadjets on the dash and the look of the big f**k off intercooler but realise you can't just add a front mount, cos most likely you'll loose a bit of power. so here's what ive come up with so far:

I'll be putting a bodykit on the car and also spraying it - but thats another thing on the back burner - onto the performance fun stuff

The car currently only has a pod filter

Apexi Super AFC II - Make sure its not running lean/rich too bad and engine is happy, plus it looks wicked on the dash

Apexi AVCR - boost controller, looks awesome on the dash also. Probably run 10psi stock

Hybrid FMIC - Brand doesnt really matter as far as I know.

Hybrid Exhaust - Some brand 3" from the cat back

HKS Adjustable Cam Gear - These look sweet and do stuff im sure :P

Trust Clear Cam cover - Do these exist for rb25?

Two a-pillar guages

Some form of cold air box

Ok now some questions:

1). Do you need to change the plenum to add in the above stuff?

2). What else would need to be added if I was to add a hks gt2530? Fuel pump? regulator? other stuff?

Thats about it. Let me know if you my ideas are good/crap/bad etc...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33134-recommended-stage-1-upgrade/
Share on other sites

1. no

2. this been covered a fair bit before.. search is your friend.

but otherwise thats not a bad plan of attack.. depends how far away u are going to put on the turbo, but if its soon don't bother with the SAFC

Well after doing some further research the aftermarket turbo can be skipped. I dont really wanna make that much more power, the stock gtst is fine. I prefer the look of a cleaned up engine bay vs a 450hp turbo. Anyone got some cool pics of a dressed up rb25? Looks is all good but i still want some grunt, aka more boost and safc

Ditch your Ex Cam Gear + Clear Cover and get a 3" Front/Dump pipe and 3" Cat. It will cost the same and give you the same power but by having a full 3" exhaust you will be able to run higher boost (which will look better on your funky looking gauges for all the boyz)

Ditch your Ex Cam Gear + Clear Cover and get a 3" Front/Dump pipe and 3" Cat. It will cost the same and give you the same power but by having a full 3" exhaust you will be able to run higher boost (which will look better on your funky looking gauges for all the boyz)

With that said though, it may be handy to have an exhaust cam gear as RB25's tend to gain quite a bit through retarding a few degrees...this along with a full turbo back (inc. dump/front, cat etc.) 3" exhaust would be enough for anyone with a stock turbo gts-t.

sweet - thanks for the feedback. at least im getting some ideas.

well as part of the 3" zorst il get them to do a dump pipe and new cat

is the current dump and cat 2.25" like the stock zorst?

does it flow like this?

[Turbo]

{ DUMP }

/

/

[CAT]

|

|

[ rest of zorst ]

turbo, dump, front,cat, catback exhaust. (sometimes the dump and front are 1 piece)

i think the cam gears are a good addition to the r33 rb25, only seem good results from these as people reporting from 10rwkw, upto 15rwkw increase in the midrange, not to mention the turbo spooling up quicker.

The car currently only has a pod filter

Apexi Super AFC II - Make sure its not running lean/rich too bad and engine is happy, plus it looks wicked on the dash

Apexi AVCR - boost controller, looks awesome on the dash also. Probably run 10psi stock

Hybrid FMIC - Brand doesnt really matter as far as I know.  

Hybrid Exhaust - Some brand 3" from the cat back

HKS Adjustable Cam Gear - These look sweet and do stuff im sure :)

Trust Clear Cam cover - Do these exist for rb25?

Two a-pillar guages

Some form of cold air box

thats a nice little package :) i've got an avcr (@ 9 psi), safc II, hybrid monster cooler, fujitsubo cat back and a k&n filter in the standard airbox (no snorkel) and i'm making 180rwkw :) i think the trust clear cam cover can fit on an RB25 (check nengun's web site) :D

If you dont plan on changing the turbo but want to maximise your HP follow this setup:

1. 3" dump+front pipe off the turbo to the cat. (this is help the stock turbo to spool 500rpm earlier)

2. 3.5" cat back exhaust. If max hp is your aim go for something like an apexi n1 system which has no resonator's and is pretty free flowing, downside is its quite loud and you could get a defect.

3. Stronger/heavier clutch, just a single plate unit with 2200-2500pound pressure plate and a lightweight (ogura flywheel is 4.5kg's lightest around) flywheel. This will help you put the power to the ground and make the car more free reving.

4. Boost controller. If you are doing this on a budget a simple bleed valve will do the job or if you have the dosh buy an electronic one as they hold boost better, dont spike and build it faster usually. However if you decide to get an aftermarket ecu some of them have boost control built in.

5. Aftermarket ecu or SAFC. If you want to make maximum hp go for the ecu it will cost more but will make the car much more fun to drive. A wolf3d has built in boost control as well which is a plus but more people around australia can tune the powerfc.

6. Exhaust cam gear + better brake pads. Cam gear will give more midrange and you will now need some better brake pads to help you pull up.

With all this you should have somewhere between 280-300hp (dyno dependant) but this is what we have been seeing in perth on a dyno dynamics accredited dyno.

Have I left anything out?

Thanks for the great feedback and ideas guys. I know have a good idea what to get. I will do up a final parts list and get some quotes for it all to be supplied/fitted/tuned.

Am i better off getting the parts myself and have a performance shop fit/tune it all or just better off saying i want these parts supplied/fitte/tuned

of course cost depending

Am i better off getting the parts myself and have a performance shop fit/tune it all or just better off saying i want these parts supplied/fitte/tuned

of course cost depending

it's up to you... i found a place that had decent prices and could do the installation and dyno tuning for me, so i did the all in one supply/fit/tune option... if you interested in the place I got mine done (since your in melb too) PM me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...