Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That's what i like to hear! the bit about it feeling special I mean.

This is a learning curve for me, I dont even own a toolbox, or have my own garage. so that might give you an idea of how often I work on cars.

Pardon me for being ignorant, but if a turbo fails, does it destroy the whole engine with it? whats the worse case scenario regarding turbo failure?

Mine had stock turbos when I bought it, and ran upto 20psi for a year (very sure they were not stock..) the front one blew, so pulled them out and stuck some N1s in there, also know of an R32 that has done Targa Tas about 9-10 times now running ceramic turbos, and has not had 1 turbo failure. My suggestion would be if you like working on cars, and are happy to have it off the road a bit, (and spend some money) then push the limit a bit, try to do the work first though (be it Turbos, or even an R33 motor etc). If you are not wanting to do this sort of work, do not run over 10-12psi, and keep plenty of oil in it (1/2-3/4 litre over full) and you will have a reliable (if thirsty) and very fun road car. After 1 year my car still feels special every time I drive it, and I love it.
  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have 2 of the same car. I love both. I drive my wife's car over the weekend and then the GTR on Monday and it is heaven. Worst case you will lose an engine. $10k bill for a proper fix.

Turbo's shouldnt fail at 14psi or under.

I can't see a reason they would unless its been thrashed to hell, which I doubt would be the case.... (with this car anyway)

If its stock, check for the boost restrictor. My 33 still had it in there, 14 years down the track. Taking it out = 14psi. (Was in place to help make it "276hp")

Edited by Ten Four

I've gotta say, I couldn't have found a more helpful forum, really appreciate the feedback and answers to my many questions from you all!

There's still a chance I may pull the pin on the whole idea and wait a bit longer, but it's been an interesting few days learning the ins and outs

of buying a GTR.

Thanks guys.

You might be right about that. As far as I can tell

though, the only difference is Brembo breaks, BBS wheels, a sticker on the

back, and an updated 4x4 system? I think they're also a tad heavier?

Haha, I'd go that VspecII if the Vin and car checks out.

Value will only go up :)

Yeah, Brembo's, BBS, sticker, different diff, R33 GTR 4wd system (its much quicker to shift torque to front wheels).

Some said steel compressor wheels in the turbos? I'm not sure on this though.

Plus, only about 1300 VspecIIs ever made.

Ok guys,

I've decided to not go ahead with either of these cars for now. Thank you all for your input, I probably would have made a huge mistake

if not for this forum.

The dream is not over! but I need more time to look and research, its foolish of me to think I can find an original car that wont need money spent

on it, so I hear what you're all saying about the pros of buying an already modified car, its just a matter of finding one that's been modified in all the

right areas with an emphasis on durability and reliability - for me anyway.

Cheers,

Paul.

V-Spec II = Base model R32 GTR, but with:

Brembo Calipers.

Revised ATTESA E-TS system.

17" BBS wheels with 245/45/17 tires.

Weight about 50kgs more.

Standard Ceramic Turbo's as only the R32 GTR N1's came with N1 Turbo's = Steel Wheels.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...