Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey mate yea i got side shots but it needs to be lower in the rear.. havent wound the coils down yet.. cant be stuffed after putting the camber arms and stuff in lol

and im gettin the plates in black and white soon. so yea it will look better haha

Why lower the rear :) ....stance is fine atm!!.....or do you want to be cop bait?.....just remember full tank of fuel or 2 rear passengers it will look fine. To low in the rear unless you get a camber kit of some kind will just scrub out tyres.

Leave it.....look's like a well thought out car that is actually usable.....rather that a car that people start sentence with "Fully sic bro........"

i think because he's coming from the illest/fatlace/stanceworks background, where that sort of wheel/fender gap does not fly! and they would have told you that kumho's do not stretch well.....

that being said, lovely car, and i love the N/A grill - looks class.

It was lower but when we put in the camber and toe arms it got taller... so yea i need to lower it again... im not looking for stupid fitment but close to it hahha but thanks everyone... and the kumhos are from another set of wheels i had so they not the ones i want/need.

:ermm:

i think because he's coming from the illest/fatlace/stanceworks background, where that sort of wheel/fender gap does not fly! and they would have told you that kumho's do not stretch well.....that being said, lovely car, and i love the N/A grill - looks class.

fully sick statement bro!!!! :ermm:

either you have failed to detect my sarcasm, or i have failed to detect yours.

got your's bud......obviously you have failed though!....but don't worry about it I'm sure you'll fail again!....and bud if my taste is so bad and my setup's so wrong tell me why my so many of my cars have appeared in mag's! :happy: and not the shit box section for readers cars!(just thought I would get in before your next silly statement)

P.S. Constructive good :P ....flaming other peoples comments for no apparent reason bad! :down: ....spelt out good enough for buddy!

got your's bud......obviously you have failed though!....but don't worry about it I'm sure you'll fail again!....and bud if my taste is so bad and my setup's so wrong tell me why my so many of my cars have appeared in mag's! :happy: and not the shit box section for readers cars!(just thought I would get in before your next silly statement)

P.S. Constructive good :P ....flaming other peoples comments for no apparent reason bad! :down: ....spelt out good enough for buddy!

umm yeh.....i think you're still missing the point. i think it is you have failed - twice now. i was just reinforcing the comments by all those people saying that it could be lower, including the owner. he obviously follows the fatlace and hella flush sites (hence the 'illest' stickers and plate surround, and custom plates!). but if you see the cars on those sites, they are a lot lower, with a lot more agressive fitment than this car. stance works is another site which promotes impossible low vehicles with flush and 'hella flush' fitment, as it is referred to in the states. if you don't know what i'm talking about - then visit this site: http://www.hellaflush.com/ - i'm fairly sure jacknessA31 knows what i'm talking about, even if you don't.

so yeh, i wasn't actually taking the piss - it WAS a constructive comment - i belonged to all those sites and had a 'stanceworks - low is a lifestyle' sticker on my last car, so not only do i know what i'm talking about, i actually like that style :

IMG_1465.jpg

Nice, what size and offset for rims and tyre size did you go for on the drifteks?

Do they rub on the back?

cheers

darren

they are 17x9 teks... should have gone 18s... but they are +30 OR 35+ I cant remember haha um 8mm slip on spacers on the rear and 20mm bolt ons on the front.. and all 4 corners have been rolled. the rear did rub dependin on the weight in the rear but wit the camber at almost 0 now there is no problem...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
    • Assuming your brake pads are not worn right down, I'd add a little brake fluid. Is there any sign of a brake fluid leak?
    • Hello all,  I need of some help. On my drive home my handbrake light lit up and started flashing. When I got home I checked my handbrake sensor under the centre console and nothing seemed out of the ordinary. I have scanned my car via the consult port, no codes shown. Checked my brake fluid as well which is half full. Tried unplugging the brake master but it didn't change anything. Thoughts on what it could be? The master float doesn't seem to be stuck. My car is an 1998 ER34 sedan GT. No hicas but has ABS Photos below 👇🏾 
×
×
  • Create New...