Jump to content
SAU Community

Heres a perfect example why cops crack down on import drivers..


Recommended Posts

yeah im sure we all drive like idiots from time to time

but 180mph on those kinda roads is just suicide

and to do it in someone elses car is even more stupid

im quite shocked that one would take it so funny and brag about it aswell

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Didn't do a very good job of the number plate.. its either PEx-x33 or BEx-x22 and the 2nd x could either be a 9 or an 8 .. black GTS-T .. cops could pick it up pretty quick on their system..

When he's back in the defect state an EPA notice could be a bit of a bummer with that turbo there..

This happened in Queensland, Vic TMU can't do anything about it...

Loving the schadenfreude in here...

Hahaaha but I live in qld fu(ker!!

And I know a couple of cops who probably could write him up... I even saved the pics...

Its just pisses me off, what if a family was coming the other way and he killed 5 people???!!!!

MCCR have always been MAJORITY (not all) co8ksuckers, this fu(kwit is the king and sucks so much co(k its hard to imagine him having enough time to drive and write off a car.

exstatic

journeyman

Reged: 05/20/02

Re: The car i WAS driving... [pics, story, lesson] [re: Oldskoolpushrods]

02/06/04 01:00 PM Edit F Reply

ahahaha.. pitty there was a roll cage in the car.

I think its obvious now, that fast cars dont make nerds cool.

HAHAHAHAAH GOLDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!

Yes I thought he was driving but I guess the title was The car i WAS driving, this car was mentioned in the thread you mentioned with the Lotus.

Still doesn't change the moral of the story...

is mark the guy standing on the wreck? ***edit : ""3) i posed on top of the car cos i was felling rather lucky to alive after looking at the trees sliding at us, and my only thoughts were 'ah crap, now im the one gonna hit the strees, not him'"

"****EDIT - CONTRARY TO RUMOURS, I WASNT DRIVING THIS CAR, I WAS PASSENGERING IN IT, AND HAD ASKED TO BE LET OUT OF THE CAR LESS THAN A MINUTE B4 THE ACCIDENT****" -mark

so if he wasn't driving and was just a passenger looking to maybe buy it, who was the owner/driver?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...