Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R180 to R200 is not a simple exercise. The 4 main bolt holes will need to be Lower, and more forward.

Bottom line is custom modification to the rear cradle.

I have a mate who has a R200 setup ready to go into a MR30, may be able to take some pics to clarify what is needed.

Secondly, how much power are you hopeing for to actually need a R200 diff??

oh and congrats on the project, much jealous

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337924-c110-coupe/#findComment-5462955
Share on other sites

Just in addition to above, I thenk there is a 'short nose' R200 then a 'long nose' R200,

Will have to verify, but the 1988 Z32 R200 will bolt in, with the only major hassle is the tailshaft flange needing changing to suit the bolt holes. (different PCD)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337924-c110-coupe/#findComment-5463302
Share on other sites

R180 to R200 is not a simple exercise. The 4 main bolt holes will need to be Lower, and more forward.

Bottom line is custom modification to the rear cradle.

I have a mate who has a R200 setup ready to go into a MR30, may be able to take some pics to clarify what is needed.

Secondly, how much power are you hopeing for to actually need a R200 diff??

oh and congrats on the project, much jealous

and you forgot the axles, are you going to stay with the U-Joint type, or move to the CV-joint type ?

and it does look nice, are they new front guards ?

also I hope you have the glass to go with it.

Edited by noddle
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337924-c110-coupe/#findComment-5463304
Share on other sites

This is Kents old car he brought another one to start again, im thinking of sticking with his RB26 and RB25 gearbox idea. Dont know much about diffs, kent showed me the custom rear from SWR which is what im thinking of grabing. Yer has been over a year looking now i also have a 4 door which will become a parts car now,

I have all glass and most parts i think.

Passin, i think the diffs are the same.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337924-c110-coupe/#findComment-5464161
Share on other sites

It does feel like we're getting railroaded presently but no blk180, i work for Alcoa World Alumina. We didn't strike in the end although the shift before me walked out for the full 12 hours. I still have to work Sun & Mon but will def post all info on Tues with pics. Nice project by the way and good luck with the rebuild. My 210 is now officially a V8 but no quicker than my ex triple webered 6. These 308's don't rev much but that'll soon be sorted.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337924-c110-coupe/#findComment-5465668
Share on other sites

post-44326-1285654594_thumb.jpgpost-44326-1285654302_thumb.jpgpost-44326-1285654696_thumb.jpgChanging from R180 to R200 LSD Longnose. The half shafts pictured are 260z ones, these replace the R180 shafts.

The moustache bar was custom made using the rubber torsion parts from the R180 moustache bar.The R180 is totally different fit for the R200.

The flange that joins the diff to the drive shaft was also swapped for a 260z one, just undid the 22mm nut (approx) with an impact gun and refitted the 260z one. It's not that hard to do, it's just sourcing a few parts and making sure you measure up right for the custom moustache bar.

From memory the R200 was $ 900.

moustache bar $ 80

Half shafts and flange $70.

Hope this helps to make up your mind on the swap

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337924-c110-coupe/#findComment-5469909
Share on other sites

Is it a long or short R200 i also have been told that some come with 12 or 14mm bolts or something like that. Yer SWracing do the moustache bar for 240ks so will grab one of those. Really not sure what to do everyone telling me to go L28 so mite seach my local wreakers see if i can find one close.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337924-c110-coupe/#findComment-5472755
Share on other sites

R200 longnose - 10 or 12mm ring gear bolts. Only relevant if you're swapping internals around.

Longnose R200's were first seen in the the 260Z, and last seen in the R31 (and equivalent vintage alternative models). 3.90:1 LSD's were fitted to DR30's, 4.375:1 LSD's were fitted to HR31's and I think that 4.11:1 LSD's were fitted to Leopards (or something like that!)

Don't hold your breath on finding one these days and consider that lots of work has been happening (esp. in the US) regarding the use of ~2006 WRX VLSD/CLSD R180 centres in Nissan applications.

The R180 isn't weak, and is lighter than the 200. I would be passively looking for one, but I think that there is plenty of other work needed on the C110 before it's on the 'must have' list :P

(yes my 240Z and DR30 have R200 LSD's, so call me a hypocrite if you must!)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337924-c110-coupe/#findComment-5474047
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...