Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am with Telstra and cannot access SAU. I performed a trace route and below are the results:

  3     3 ms     4 ms     7 ms  203.52.51.198

 4     7 ms     6 ms     6 ms  serial5-5-1.mac1.mackay.telstra.net [139.130.79.

241]

 5    25 ms    23 ms    25 ms  atm6-0-0-5.cha-core2.brisbane.telstra.net [203.5

0.44.109]

 6    25 ms    25 ms    25 ms  gigabitethernet4-2.cha-core4.brisbane.telstra.ne

t [203.50.44.145]

 7    41 ms    39 ms    38 ms  pos4-0.chw-core2.sydney.telstra.net [203.50.6.22

5]

 8    38 ms    41 ms    38 ms  10GigabitEthernet3-0.pad-core5.Sydney.telstra.ne

t [203.50.6.90]

 9    41 ms    39 ms    39 ms  GigabitEthernet0-0.syd-core02.Sydney.net.reach.c

om [203.50.13.250]

10   189 ms   191 ms   189 ms  i-12-3.wil-core02.net.reach.com [202.84.144.193]



11   222 ms   222 ms   222 ms  i-2-0.dal-core01.net.reach.com [202.84.143.66]

12   251 ms   229 ms   229 ms  i-3-1.dal01.net.reach.com [202.84.142.82]

13   221 ms   222 ms   222 ms  dfw5-peer10.algx.net [206.223.118.33]

14   250 ms   329 ms   357 ms  dfw5-core3-pos7-0.atlas.algx.net [165.117.48.29]



15   265 ms   241 ms   243 ms  dfw10-core1-so-7-2-0.atlas.algx.net [165.117.69.

126]

16   228 ms   228 ms   229 ms  iah10-core2-so-2-0-0-0.atlas.algx.net [165.117.2

00.54]

17   232 ms   233 ms   233 ms  iah10-edge1-pos7-0.atlas.algx.net [165.117.192.1

46]

18   227 ms   227 ms   228 ms  64.245.101.10

19   228 ms   229 ms   226 ms  ivhou-207-218-245-39.ev1.net [207.218.245.39]

20     *        *        *     Request timed out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33844-cant-access-sau/
Share on other sites

traceroute to skylinesaustralia.com (207.44.176.71), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets

1  FastEthernet6-0.civ-service1.Canberra.telstra.net (203.50.1.65)  0.54 ms  0.363 ms  0.412 ms

2  GigabitEthernet3-0.civ-core2.Canberra.telstra.net (203.50.10.129)  0.409 ms  0.425 ms  0.44 ms

3  GigabitEthernet2-2.dkn-core1.Canberra.telstra.net (203.50.6.126)  0.599 ms  0.607 ms  0.615 ms

4  Pos4-0.ken-core4.Sydney.telstra.net (203.50.6.121)  4.029 ms  4.195 ms  4.258 ms

5  10GigabitEthernet3-0.pad-core4.Sydney.telstra.net (203.50.6.86)  4.653 ms  4.557 ms  4.258 ms

6  GigabitEthernet0-0.syd-core01.Sydney.net.reach.com (203.50.13.242)  4.329 ms  4.35 ms  4.378 ms

7  i-13-2.sjc-core01.net.reach.com (202.84.143.41)  191.857 ms  191.875 ms  192.646 ms

8  i-13-0.paix-core01.net.reach.com (202.84.143.249)  186.552 ms  186.693 ms  186.713 ms

9  134.159.63.250 (134.159.63.250)  180.465 ms  180.29 ms  180.532 ms

10  pos9-0.mpr2.pao1.us.mfnx.net (208.184.232.182)  185.889 ms  185.659 ms  185.759 ms

11  so-4-2-0.mpr4.sjc2.us.above.net (208.185.175.161)  180.827 ms  180.753 ms  180.85 ms

12  so-2-2-0.cr1.dfw2.us.above.net (64.125.29.46)  260.961 ms  260.613 ms  260.472 ms

13  so-3-1-0.mpr1.iah1.us.above.net (64.125.30.229)  254.2 ms  253.857 ms  253.954 ms

14  216.200.251.61.ev1.net (216.200.251.61)  254.685 ms  254.798 ms  255.994 ms

15  ivhou-207-218-245-39.ev1.net (207.218.245.39)  217.847 ms  217.977 ms  218.014 ms

16  * * *

same from tracert.com :flamer:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33844-cant-access-sau/#findComment-678769
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you not seen geospy.ai? It can now give GPS co ords to within a metre from a photo, even if it's a random photo you take inside. Supposedly at the moment only the government/law enforcement has access to that... Supposedly...
    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
×
×
  • Create New...