Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i just dont get how u think u have 264 fwhp when ur car is a 3l, non turbo, and u told me mods were a twin throttle kit, and cams. u said once u open these babys up, there is shitloads of power to gain. Yet again i disagree cos ive been thru the whole modifying nas before and i tell u cams exhaust twin trottle kits do basically shit all. maybe 10-20% max.

Finally, when there is another magna that is turboed, shitload more mods then ur car, and only has 125fkws, ie 167whp, it is just too hard too believe that ur car makes the power u claim.

Basically what im gettin at is that i have nothin against ur car, its just i hate it when people bs. If u remember, and u prolly dont, the first thing i said to u when i came up to u at nats was, man ur car sounds ****en loud. Then u went on about dynos and hp figures. I then left thinkin what a load of crap. If u just told me the truth, then i would of thought, hey its good to b different to everyone else.

Do u get what i mean? not having a stab at u, its just that a car with as much power as u claim does not get bad ets or even low ts like u do. Either u have been lied to or u are bsing us.

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

if you want to know the full extent of the mods then here i go. NO BS for f--k sake.

Cams - degreed,

extensive ported polished intake manifold

extensive ported polished heads with redesigned combustion chambers

custom twin throttle body

haltech e6k ECU

custom designed extractors

fuel (for this hp figure + 4,6 rotary day) ELF LMS 2:1 - 2parts lms to 1 part premium

3" exhaust (altho 4,6 rotary was running with dump pipe)

Compression upped to 13.1:1 with high compression pistions

dudes, i didnt come to this forum to sturr the pot. and if i did, i wouldnt be defending myself. jezzus. common. dude, EnricoPalazzo, i see where your comming from, and if you dont believe me, well, there is nothing i can do to change that, perhaps and YES i would be more then happy to participate, to prove my innocence, next time im down in adelaide, perhaps set up a small dyno day, with you and a few of the other people who think im talkin out my ass. you pick the dyno, you dont even have to tell me where, ill just follow you from a pre meet spot, and then all you will see is raw figures. no BS. no talk. just figures. and yes, altho un-nessary to 'prove' i have no problem facing people if it means i can earn my creditablilty by proof that any of you cant deny.

ill uphold my challenge to a blind dyno date. if you see me in adel one day, pull me up and we can go from there.

bottom line, oviously there is nothing i can say/show to make you guys think otherwise, but im not BSing.

im sure there is a few variables that killed my times

a) air temp, still in the 40's (36 or something on my quickest attempt)

B) running on 28kg-a piece 19" rims all round.. i know silly..

c) lack of traction (and cant be deny'd it did wheelspin outta control!) on low profile 19" tyres. if i could of sourced 2x 15s and put 12psi in em then im sure it would of been a lot better results.

d) driver in-experience - my first time ever doing such an event.. this also has a lot to do id say, and at least i can say this honestly.

well i think ur mistake was that u ran the car off the dump, as nas really need backpressure.

I still dont think u can be makin that much power, even thou the mods are extensive. So maybe someone is bodging dyno figures. I mean still u only cracked a 90 something mph ts. This is a true indication of ur cars real power, and i know that it was farkin hot as, but still running the elf would have helped the car dramatically.

Here's some figures to use as a rough guide...

My car had a best MPH of 114.9 during the Nat's (17-18psi boost and 44'c air temp) My best MPH from the other night was 117.75 (17'c)

However I was also leaking less boost on the 117.75 run (yes still have BOV issues - new BOV coming) and I was also running 21-22psi. The extra boost alone would have made the difference. Temp certainly plays a factor in engine performance, but not THAT much.

I also ran dead on identical 12.84 best ET's on both meets!

So if the Magna really had 196kw at the front wheels then the MPH should be MUCH higher, regardless of how hot, or how poor the traction. Even with woeful 60's (2.5-2.8) and with hp down due to temp, the power/weight ratio of this Magna should still be good for 100+mph

Ok... lets forget it now. Maybe its true, maybe BS or maybe someone played with the 'X' Factor on your dyno run. Having said this 15.094 @ 91.94mph even on a hot day would maybe equal to a 14.8/14.7 at the best if you are lucky. Probably even with all the best setup and dragging technique.

Sorry ben, but you have to be realistic, a FLAT 14 or high 13 is a loooooooooooong way from 15. Especially for a non turbo. But anyway, good luck.

ok, we'll leave it. its going no where.

also perhaps consider a power to weight ratio. the magna comes in at a lean 1570kg + driver, so its around 1610ish or so. what would a line' weight.. 1200ish i think is what my s14 was + driver. so again, a good 300kg advantage at the very least.

compairing the ET's from the time slip thing at the top of the page, a 91mph is around the low 14's for your lines' its definately off the line where FWD and not decent drag tyres fail me.

ok, so perhaps someone has played the 'x' factor game on me, thats not ME to blame. i can only relay what ive been told. so if you think its unrealistic, and now that i think, achieavble not but driveable, perhaps the end figure is slightly lower, but im more then confident of 220+hp over. yes elf does play a big part but we all try to show what the most we can. in this instance i got a reading of 260so hp. so ill use it.

im glad most of you matured during the latter posts, but like i said before, why im here is cos of my late s14 that died :) and i enjoy a passion for all vehicles not just a car in particular.

perhaps ill watch the SA thread for a DYNO day, and pay a quick holiday (anything to get me out of the NT ;)) down there just so THEN i know i can get a equal chance at the dyno.

Thank you all very much

Ben.

im sure there is a few variables that killed my times

a) air temp, still in the 40's (36 or something on my quickest attempt)

B) running on 28kg-a piece 19" rims all round.. i know silly..

c) lack of traction (and cant be deny'd it did wheelspin outta control!) on low profile 19" tyres. if i could of sourced 2x 15s and put 12psi in em then im sure it would of been a lot better results.

d) driver in-experience - my first time ever doing such an event.. this also has a lot to do id say, and at least i can say this honestly.

Do you have a dyno print out or anything to confirm this (no dodgy excel spreadsheets please ;)) Just curious to see thats all, becasue my R32 has 200rwkw (268 rwhp) and run consitantly at around 104mph when i had a go at the drags, and as whatisname pointed out, even if you run really crap 60ft times (mine were 2.4-2.5 seconds) you will still run a good top speed - if you have the power

I would suspect that a 3L Magna, even though they weigh a little more, with its increased displacemnt and probably a heap for torque than a my 2L 8.5-1 comp RB20, can only manange 90odd mph for its top speed??

Just curious, not having a go or anything

I did see your car at the event though, sounded pretty crazy, just lacked the pace to go along with the sound :)

Sounds good.

Also r33 weigh in at a hefty 1400 approx.

Gotta remember, the huge wing and the wheels etc give it another 100 or so HP at the wheels ;) add another 50 or so for the stickers etc, it all adds up!!

260~hp at the wheels, even in a Magna, you would think the top speed would be around 100-102mph

As Chris32 says are there any dyno sheets?

hmmm now I'm confused .... how is it then that an S15 like mine of 1,240kg plus me 90kg = 1,330kg with 200rwkw, easily and consistently beats R33s of significantly more power? Even when I only had 158rwkw I used to kick the snot out of Diggity's R33 with 160rwkw and my brother-in-laws R33 of 155rwkw - like it was no competition .... this webpage says the R33 gtr is 1,750, which I think is correct http://www.j-garage.com/2110.htm .... but now after looking around it does seem the stock R33 is only 1,390kg .... I wonder why they're so slow? :) All this time I was putting it down to extra weight lol - j/k guys ....

comon andrew, only 90kg???? I do think the suspension may have something to do with it, and the weight distribution, gearing (taller diff), or maybe you are just an awesome driver? an extra 100kg will make a noticeable difference, see if you can find someone who weighs an extra 100+kg and go for a run, just make sure they are in the front, not in the boot helping with traction:p

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...