Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

note being defensive, just the only reason iv been given so far is "cos its stainless". i was after a reasonable reason that one would pay the extra

So it doesn't rust...

So it makes good power...

To get it to tuck up nicely under a lowered car...

That $750 mild system was only worth $60 in materials, you feel ripped off?

I run ethanol in my car so a mild system wouldn't last more than a few months im guessing... You are right though, stainless isn't special, titanium is a much better choice. :P

So it doesn't rust...

So it makes good power...

To get it to tuck up nicely under a lowered car...

That $750 mild system was only worth $60 in materials, you feel ripped off?

I run ethanol in my car so a mild system wouldn't last more than a few months im guessing... You are right though, stainless isn't special, titanium is a much better choice. :D

  • paint a. A liquid mixture, usually of a solid pigment in a liquid vehicle, used as a decorative or protective coating.

  • stainless makes good power? better than mild steel? could you give me some stats on how it makes more power then a mild steel system?.

  • a custom hand made one would tuck up just as much, if not better then an off the shelf item.thats why its called custom made... it wouldn't be custom if it didn't suit the car it was being made for exactly

  • no not at all, cos i didn't pay excessively for a full sick brand name one

  • obviously if theres reason such as methanol, then thats a reason... my question was biased on the average every day driver

EDIT:

im not trying to ague the point, just curios as to why i would want to pay the extra other then "cos its stainless" or "cos its [brand name]", when u can get something made locally that will perform exactly the same

Edited by GeNOS

pretty sure the only bonus with stainless is because it wont rust and looks cleaner.....

i would never put a stainless exhaust on my car, not worth the extra $ imo, unless ofcourse you A. love your car enough to spend extra and B have extra money to throw around.

stainless makes good power? better than mild steel? could you give me some stats on how it makes more power then a mild steel system?.

As with most mild steel tight arse exhausts, mandrel bends are rarely used, gas is not purged inside the pipe while welding, galvanising is not cleaned off before welding, mostly mig welded not tig, not to mention, you cant heat wrap mild.

Its just not worth spending the time to get good power on a low cost system that will only last a few years. You don't think its worth the money? I do and so do my customers.

the main reason is rust and longevity. Something you might be intimately acquainted with, looking at your sig.

Depending on how you use your car, that one mild steel might turn into rust quite quick, even if its painted, because you can't paint from the inside out...

They also sound different, as i understand it, mild steel has a dull, softer note, while stainless has a louder, harsher note (obviously this is highly depended on the muffler/resonator set up)

Its fine if you want to go for an cheaper product, just don't judge us for wanting the opposite.

As with most mild steel tight arse exhausts, mandrel bends are rarely used, gas is not purged inside the pipe while welding, galvanising is not cleaned off before welding, mostly mig welded not tig, not to mention, you cant heat wrap mild.

Its just not worth spending the time to get good power on a low cost system that will only last a few years. You don't think its worth the money? I do and so do my customers.

your stating defects in workmanship, not the product.

EXACT same system, performance of stainless vs steel is what im talking about. not high end stainless vs steel system made up by barry in his shed after a case of VB.

why would you heat wrap your cat back system???

mild steel lasting "only a few years"? hardly. but yes, obviously it wont last as long as stainless.

most people would usually sell your cars on long before it would be an issue. plus if your a keen modder, your probably making changes here or there, which may require changing it anyway before its an issue

anywho, ill agree to disagree

pretty sure the only bonus with stainless is because it wont rust and looks cleaner.....

Agreed.... and the difference in exhaust note as stated by PN-Mad - well in my experience this has been the case anyway.

your stating defects in workmanship, not the product.

EXACT same system, performance of stainless vs steel is what im talking about. not high end stainless vs steel system made up by barry in his shed after a case of VB.

why would you heat wrap your cat back system???

mild steel lasting "only a few years"? hardly. but yes, obviously it wont last as long as stainless.

most people would usually sell your cars on long before it would be an issue. plus if your a keen modder, your probably making changes here or there, which may require changing it anyway before its an issue

anywho, ill agree to disagree

Exact same system, I don't see there being a difference in performance.

You wouldn't bother heat wrapping a cat-back... but dump pipe or possibly front pipe? Definitely.

Depends on the engine and driving conditions as to how long it will last... Take the VQ for instance, there is quite a bit of water vapour that goes through the exhaust (and sits in it when the car is turned off). With a stainless exhaust, this is not a problem... or how about if you drive on dirt roads? Having mud stuck to a mild steel exhaust would also speed up oxidation due to the moisture being "held" onto the steel. Even if it was painted, the protective paint could easily be scratched off in areas by stones or speed bumps.

Why is modification easier for a mild system than a stainless one? They can both easily be cut and welded so labour charge is the same and both are readily available.

Perhaps the prices quoted to you for a stainless system in the past have been a little cheeky?

I suppose another plus to a stainless exhaust would be re-sale. There has to be a reason people will state in their sale ads "Full custom stainless exhaust" in they have one and only "Full custom exhaust" if they have a mild steel one.

Both systems have their +'s and -'s, but for the sake of a couple hundred bucks I will always go with a stainless unit over mild.

I was tinkering around on youtube before,

kinda wishing i went the Exoticspeed route instead of HKS. There Exoticspeed RII-Titan model is basically a near perfect replication of the extremely pricey Amuse system :rofl2:

http://www.exoticspeed.ca/product_info.php...roducts_id=4921

After reading all those comments the reason I went with what I did is that at the end of the day , I got the satisfaction of modifying my own car , giving me the feeling that I was making my car my own , the system was a perfect fit and there was absolutely nothing that needed to be modified to make it fit , I also have the piece of mind that I know exactly what parts and fixings are used on my car , also I plan to keep the car till the day it dies so I bought with the intention to buy something that will last me longer , even if it costs more in the short term .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...