Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No I'm not saying there wrong, it just seems so wasteful :banana:

Anyways I'm sure not all chefs do it...The chef at the local Chinese doesn't deglaze the pan, he just chucks everything into a very disgusting looking pan with burnt crap still in it. ;)

As long as you are not over the limit there is no law stating you can't have an alcoholic beverage whilst driving.

Really? A while back my mate who was at the time freshly off his P's decided to be a smartarse and raise his stubby to the cop sitting next to us. It was his first beer of the night and had only gone through 1/4 of it so he definately wasn't over the limit btw, but to cut a long story short he got defected (lol) but he also copped a fine for street drinking. It might be technically legal to drink and drive if your under 0.05, but just not anywhere thats public, and incidently most roads are public places

errr no...

the wine is used to deglaze the pan should be maybe 100ml's at most if cooking for 4 and this should be added to the pan while hot to strip the flavours from the bottom of the pan... it is not for the taste of the wine at all

the wine hits BOILING point instantly and will have 0% alcohol within a few seconds

hm, didn't know that.

but even though the wine hits boiling point instantly, i think unless its a dash of wine, there will still be significant amounts, it will be reduced but there is a lower limit to how much you can remove via distillation.

BUT, if there's very little wine used in the first place, then the alcohol remaining will be negligible.

There's this chinese wine chicken thingy that my granny cooks, its double boiled in a sealed pot with ginger, chicken and a whole load of other stuff, even though its boiled for about 45mins, the soup still tastes of the chinese wine and alcohol. but, its pretty awesome.

Edited by xALmoN
Drinking in street/public place is only an offence if the area is designated as a "dry" area by counsel by laws. They need to have signs in area stating same too.

Oops that happened in WA where I think it is a $200 fine if you get caught drinking in any public place, I assumed victoria would have the same laws but I guess not

You can choose to have a blood test but the alcohol levels decrease MUCH faster in your breath than blood. If you were say 0.07 with breath and had blood taken a hour later you would most likely be 0.08+.

In most cases people's alcohol level are on the rise. They keep rising generally for about 1-2 hours before decreasing. Unless it's just mouth alcohol.

it all depends on the person though, that's what it basically comes down too.

How fast they matablize the alcohol...

Oops that happened in WA where I think it is a $200 fine if you get caught drinking in any public place, I assumed victoria would have the same laws but I guess not

Nah, there isn't a law saying you can't drink anywhere in public, but there is designated "dry" areas...which I can't of to many places that aren't..

because i am so nice/was bored @ work I decided to make a tut on carbonara...

cook garlic

IMG_0302.jpg

add bacon - cook more

IMG_0311.jpg

bacon is cooked... notice epic bacon flavour helplessly trapped on pan...

IMG_0313.jpg

deglase pan with wine

IMG_0316.jpg

epic bacon flavour now released and ready to be consumed by hungry human

IMG_0317.jpg

place egg in bowl.... i use an extra yolk for flavour

IMG_0318.jpg

add parmesan and some parsley and black pepper

IMG_0320.jpg

whisk that shit

IMG_0323.jpg

add cooked pasta to pan... in this case it's housemade tagliatelle

IMG_0324.jpg

add pan contents to bowl contents and mixy mixy

IMG_0325.jpg

add some shaved parmesan for texture/flavour

IMG_0326.jpg

put in bowl... garnish with raw egg yolk for the lucky eater to mix through themselves

IMG_0328.jpg

and that's how you make a carbonara...

some people add cream, but traditionally it's not really supposed to be there :)

wut

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...