Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • chaos

    7164

  • Ska

    5791

  • BelGarion

    3645

  • Nexus9

    3590

Top Posters In This Topic

http://www.mrcontrols.com/images/badblock1.jpg

http://www.mrcontrols.com/images/badblock2.jpg

http://www.mrcontrols.com/images/badblock3.jpg

A while back we saw a block failure at the ~700rwhp level on Chemvolt's engine. Here is another failure from toymanf's engine. This engine was doing it's first competitive 1/4 mile run.

Toymanf is not sure how much power he was making on the run, but the dyno he was on while getting the engine set up gave 540rwhp on turbo only (all subsequent runs were done with the tires spinning on the dyno) and the 1/4 mile run on which the engine failed was running that plus a 200 shot of nitrous.

The tune was conservative and you can see that there are no signs of detonation on the piston or cylinder walls. EGT temps were fine. AFRs were in the 11s. Fuel was C16.

The block was a seasoned stock block, bored 40 over. A 1.6mm HKS headgasket held down with ARP studs torqued to 65ft/lbs. It appears that the corner of the block around the #1 cylinder was unable to hold the lifting force that the head was putting on it.

There was at least another 100rwhp left untapped in this engine, but it is unclear at this point if the 3s block is capable of holding that much power over the 1/4 mile.

Any thoughts on how to contain +700rwhp power levels and keep the block intact? Sleeves would not have helped here. I've heard of using 1/2" studs but that is going to require a lot of work and I'm not sure if there is enough material in the block to make that work. Would the 5s block more reliably accept this much power and more?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...