Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

its a bit deeper than that harry. Time attack is a new fangled name for sprints that generally exclude cams from the equation for all the above mentioned reasons.

My reply was directed at Duncs reference to time attack stepping in to line with cams rules. Wont happen. the whole idea was to move away from their draconian ideas.

it doesn't need to exclude CAMS from the equation. The event format is the same as a CAMS Sprint event and can run under that permit. CAMS will approve permits for events with different than normal classes, as you have seen with Superlap/WTAC. And NSW have different classes at speed events than we do in QLD, and WA do it their own way too.

To answer the previous question, CAMS don't run "Time Attacks". CAMS don't organise any events. Clubs do. SAuQLD is a CAMS Affiliated club, so stop complaining and start organising events with classes that all the TimeAttack crew want! hehe

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

it doesn't need to exclude CAMS from the equation. The event format is the same as a CAMS Sprint event and can run under that permit. CAMS will approve permits for events with different than normal classes, as you have seen with Superlap/WTAC. And NSW have different classes at speed events than we do in QLD, and WA do it their own way too.

To answer the previous question, CAMS don't run "Time Attacks". CAMS don't organise any events. Clubs do. SAuQLD is a CAMS Affiliated club, so stop complaining and start organising events with classes that all the TimeAttack crew want! hehe

we affiliated for those members wanting to venture further field Harry, To date no "MEMBERS" have taken advantage of it. :P

it doesn't need to exclude CAMS from the equation. The event format is the same as a CAMS Sprint event and can run under that permit. CAMS will approve permits for events with different than normal classes, as you have seen with Superlap/WTAC. And NSW have different classes at speed events than we do in QLD, and WA do it their own way too.

To answer the previous question, CAMS don't run "Time Attacks". CAMS don't organise any events. Clubs do. SAuQLD is a CAMS Affiliated club, so stop complaining and start organising events with classes that all the TimeAttack crew want! hehe

In WA neither CAMS nor the series run events. They are run by the car clubs themselves. See here.

2010SESeriesRegulations.pdf

we affiliated for those members wanting to venture further field Harry, To date no "MEMBERS" have taken advantage of it. :P

I've been a member for a couple of years and have done CAMS hillclimbs, sprints interstate and locally with it. Its not as hard as you make out. Their classes aren't ideal for imports, but not as bad as NSW by all accounts! Skylines can run in sports cars at most QLD CAMS events and get out there and have fun. Alot of club level events would let them into Improved Prod as well.

One other thing I'd like to know....a couple of people have made a distinction about "Race" cars as though they are inherantly faster than a street car. In my experience a log booked race car is likely to be less modified and heavier (cage etc) than the average road car that turns up to a sprint - so why make the distinction?

Common regs should be common regs. A car should not be allowed more (or less) mods because it happens to have a number plate.

well race car roll cages are not really a weight penalty, they're also a performance advantage. And I'm not really sure about most race cars being less modified and heavier than the average road car at events! But otherwise yeah, if the 'race' car fits the regs there's no need to really make a distinction between race and road cars.

The fastest car at the Australian Championships was road registered. And he drove it home! On a more normal level of performance, at the servo on the way home I was filling up next to a trailer-sailor stripped out Datto 1600 "race car" with full cage and FJ20T. He was only a few tenths faster than my full street trim 180SX that I drove home in climate controled comfort.

I guess in my example classes, you could rename the classes and remove the registered requirement. Make the "Race" category for anything with things like: slicks, perspex, lightweight panels other than bonnets, or other modifcations in excess of what's allowed in MS.

EDIT: you know what? its probably easier and more sensible to just use CAMS Race classes for Sprints, but drop the restrictor requirement for Improved Production, allow a fibreglass bonnet, and a few rose joints. Particularly as SuperSprints are supposed to be a stepping stone to racing - makes sence to use the racing classes rather than try to re-invent the wheel totally.

Edited by hrd-hr30
I've been a member for a couple of years and have done CAMS hillclimbs, sprints interstate and locally with it. Its not as hard as you make out. Their classes aren't ideal for imports, but not as bad as NSW by all accounts! Skylines can run in sports cars at most QLD CAMS events and get out there and have fun. Alot of club level events would let them into Improved Prod as well.

I am not holding anybody back Harry, More power to those like yourself and Nod and the berry boys etc who go out and do it. I'm happy doin what I do for the moment and I guess most others are too or more would take advantge of our cams access.

well race car roll cages are not really a weight penalty, they're also a performance advantage. And I'm not really sure about most race cars being less modified and heavier than the average road car at events! But otherwise yeah, if the 'race' car fits the regs there's no need to really make a distinction between race and road cars.

The fastest car at the Australian Championships was road registered. And he drove it home! On a more normal level of performance, at the servo on the way home I was filling up next to a trailer-sailor stripped out Datto 1600 "race car" with full cage and FJ20T. He was only a few tenths faster than my full street trim 180SX that I drove home in climate controled comfort.

I think a lot of this stems from ambiguity around the actual distinction of "Race Car"

Why not make the distinction between what constitutes are Race Car and a street car and then just separate them at the beginning ?

QUOTE (hrd-hr30 @ 1 Dec 2010, 04:32 PM) well race car roll cages are not really a weight penalty, they're also a performance advantage. And I'm not really sure about most race cars being less modified and heavier than the average road car at events! But otherwise yeah, if the 'race' car fits the regs there's no need to really make a distinction between race and road cars.

The fastest car at the Australian Championships was road registered. And he drove it home! On a more normal level of performance, at the servo on the way home I was filling up next to a trailer-sailor stripped out Datto 1600 "race car" with full cage and FJ20T. He was only a few tenths faster than my full street trim 180SX that I drove home in climate controled comfort.

I think a lot of this stems from ambiguity around the actual distinction of "Race Car"

Why not make the distinction between what constitutes are Race Car and a street car and then just separate them at the beginning ?

Was this a honda powered supercharged no roof less that 1000 kg car running in all class 2A, 2B 2F as previously explained wouldn't really class this as road registered under aussie rules as the car didnt comply for CAMs did somehow comply for QLD Aussie These days as an Aussie Champion not less than 10 times in hillclimb and supersprint, these trophys have all been chucked out the back shed cause they are not worth a squirt of piss - I don't give a rats if your running a V8 holden, 4cly Datto or an SV Spec car.

CAMs have no control, the rules suck, if you can find someone that will make them eligable even if they are written in black and white - secondly, as far as most are concerned to contest an Australian Title, first you must have a recognised class to contest or defend, in QLD I was pissed to start with - glad I was'nt running 2F shopping car in the group. from what I read of CAMs supp regs, it states Hillclimbs and Supersprints must be run under speed event rules at state and national level I assume - doesn't say otherwise - I believe it also states Type 1,2,3, 4, 5 and SV

How can it be so difficult for this to be done. Do we really need 25 historic classes in hillclimb or eg Type SV 1, 2, 3 4 as run in ACT apparently or we could go to QLD and SA and have more and more blah blah blah

Surely we could go back to the basics of 1,2,3,4, 5 and SV even if they have to be split into levels 1 - 2 as per back in the 80's if you don't fit move on. And as far as slicks go if it has for racing purpose only put a cage in or put your roadies back on and church and shopping use only

Cheers

QUOTE (FineLine @ 1 Dec 2010, 01:43 PM) its a bit deeper than that harry. Time attack is a new fangled name for sprints that generally exclude cams from the equation for all the above mentioned reasons.

My reply was directed at Duncs reference to time attack stepping in to line with cams rules. Wont happen. the whole idea was to move away from their draconian ideas.

it doesn't need to exclude CAMS from the equation. The event format is the same as a CAMS Sprint event and can run under that permit. CAMS will approve permits for events with different than normal classes, as you have seen with Superlap/WTAC. And NSW have different classes at speed events than we do in QLD, and WA do it their own way too.

To answer the previous question, CAMS don't run "Time Attacks". CAMS don't organise any events. Clubs do. SAuQLD is a CAMS Affiliated club, so stop complaining and start organising events with classes that all the TimeAttack crew want! hehe

You got that wrong, I think CAMs are already out of the equation by many. I am sure they have worked it out by registrations and renewals, you are correct that the clubs organise the event, this is the problem - if the club can't read the rule book and CAMs stamp it - people are gunna get peeed off.

Its about time for an update

Interesting that a bunch of people on a website with same/similar cars can't agree on a set of rules. I'd hate the job, you could never keep everyone happy, especially in a transition period.

Having said that, here are Duncan's motorsport categories, hereby solving all problems.

2 categories - sports and touring cars. sports cars have 1 or 2 seats and can be open or closed. touring cars have at least 4 seats.

3 classes in each:

Standard: Only allow reliability mods like coolers/radiator. ECU and suspension free. Brakes free under standard size wheels. Street tyres only.

Improved: No aero. Engine swaps from the same manufacturer with the same number of cylinders. Suspension pickups can be moved slightly. Gearbox and diff internals free but not sequential. Wheels +1" wide and +1" taller than factory. Semi Slicks only.

Open: Aero. Cages. Spaceframes. Slicks. Sequential gears OK. 4wd/2wd/front engine/rear engine/whatever, go for it.

Each broken into capacity groups: 0-1600, 1601-3000, over 3000. Turbo, rotary or supercharger x2.

Not many classes, so not many hard choices. In total 2 x 3 x 3 = 18 groups to place within.

I am with you Marlin, I started the thread - anyways - I just won Bathurst Supersprint and Hillclimb Speed Weekend in R33 under Sports Sedan class. My partner and good typist, ran our R32 in Type SV and got 2nd in supersprint and 1st hillclimb, Karen's a daily driver once a year at this event of late.

Good to see Steve's - Torana, again got record for classes. I spose raises the question is this a step above Duncans no class record.

Anyway if the R35s are keen Easter looks like fun in regularity 2S I'd say theres about 3 chances of getting a run. One starts with I am first, Fa, next Nc,

So that means, if it goes ahead? It will be nice to have all you friends for accomodation that weekend - price negotiable!

Cheers - register and have a go

I don't even get the point of this entire thread, or exactly what question the OP was asking? And I can't even read that ^^^^!

  • 1 year later...

So its now 2012

Who is happy, who isnt?

I'm not real happy, wanted to run the Supra in 3E prod, basically got told, gtfo its too hard and we dont want your kind around these parts.....but if I had the locally delivered 3L version of the same car that would be fine...but oh no...my 12 extra killerwasps and 500cc less capacity are a big no no lol

So like most I'll be going AASA and do battle with sport sedans/time attack cars and MX5's :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did this end up working? Did you take some pictures?
    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
×
×
  • Create New...