Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Good to hear Chris,Roys a top bloke and he helped me out heaps :D

Where the power wire branches out it's right under the throttle body.

I will also put up my maps maybe even tonight or on the weekend.

One thing I learnt yesterday is check your plenum bolts coz I had one missing and god knows for how long.I put another bolt in and now it spools up so quick like 500rpm quick.I would get 11psi at 4000rpm in second before and now get 11psi at 3500rpm,so much better to drive.

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, on saturday morning ( I had a few hours to kill before going to a wedding LOL!) I had a look at my spare motor to see if I could locate the power wire going to the injectors

As it was a spare, it was all done for a bit of practice, next weekend hopefully I can get it all done

Took me about half a hour to get everything off and I found the wire no probs. On mine I traced it from the injectors back up the loom, and it branced off into four, with one wire going down and branching of to three to feed the foward 3 injectors

I tested my resistor pack, and it measured 6 ohms on each wire, so looks to be good.

How did you guys get the plugs of the injectors? Being a spare motor I tried a few things and the only way I could get them of was by pulling that retaing spring wire thing off but I kept on breaking the little plastic bits off that held that spring in place!! Hopefully there is a better way than what I was doing!

All seemed pretty straight forward though, to get the fuel rail out I had to pull the back two injectors out of the rail, as they would foul on a hose going to the plenum

Another thing, after taking the throttle body and the AAC valve assembly off the gaskets where buggerd, chances are it will happen when I do it to the motor in the car it will tear them too, can I use gasket paper and make some replacemnets up or are gaskets available from Nissan as a spare part?

Other than that, all seems to be not to hard at all

How do my maps I have compare to everyone elses?

Chris

i used a pair of needle nose pliers to remove the injector plug clips...they came off with no hassles...

I replaced my throttle body gasket and aac valve gasket on mine (i had every gasket replaced on my new motor etc.) as every one of em is at least 12 years old....go the Nissan genuine 'cos their cheap, and not worth replacing later if they leak :rofl:

Sorry, worked Saturday, and slept most of Sunady after the drive back to Vic. Ill have a look at the Maps later this week and post up before sat morning, though my map will only be good for up to 2500rpm then our turbo characteristics are likely to be very different

No probs mate, I have ordered my gaskets for the throttle body and AAC valve, they should be in today

I have a feeling that my map is for bigger injectors but I will wait to do a quick comparison first. If you guys don't want to post them up you can PM them to me if you want

When I get my car tuned I will post up the final map for comparison's sake. I punched in all the numbers into a Excel spreadsheet BOOSTD made up, it all looks to be pretty good, with no big holes or dips in the fuel map

Is there a option in the PowerFC to adjust the injector scaling? What I was thinking is if the tune is no good in my car to get me around for a few days before I get it tuned, I could always load the standard map and reduce the overall fuel map by 63% (280 v 440cc injectors, please correct me if I am wrong??) and it should be drivable at least, allthough it wouldn't be seeing any sort of boost before it hits the dyno!!

Chris

Roy has a PowerFC

Got all my gaskets and crap just then, so looks like this weekend I should get it all done. Also picked up a boost control kit for the PFC as well :D

Just need to find out if my maps are suitable now or if they are no good, if not I will do as I said in my previous post and default the PFC and use the injector scaling function to drop back the amount of fuel, either way it should work............

Chris

Ah ok, thanx. I just read the whole post and there was a post from him from Feb saying he's using rb20 ECU. Must've upgraded since then. Would RB26 injectors work on the RB20 ECU or does it need to be re-mapped?

It would need to be re-mapped, as they are a much larger flowing injector

Hey Chris,

this might be a stupid question, what does the pfc value represent, is it load?? or am i confused???

Also on the fuel map, is 136 the largest number u can go (most amount of flow?). This would have to be changed when larger injectors are fitted or is that where injector correction comes into it?

I'm trying to understand how these things work.

Cheers

Hey Chris,  

this might be a stupid question, what does the pfc value represent, is it load?? or am i confused???

Also on the fuel map, is 136 the largest number u can go (most amount of flow?). This would have to be changed when larger injectors are fitted or is that where injector correction comes into it?  

I'm trying to understand how these things work.

Cheers

As far as I can work out - the PFC Value part is refering to the location of the point of the map, from 1-20, so I am pretty sure its load. I didn't come up with the chart, so I cannot be sure, I just punched in my numbers I had copied of my PFC

136 isn't the biggest number you can go, but I am not sure what it goes up to as I haven't played around with it much. The map that was in there before mine was from BOOSTD's R33, which was running standard injectors and had numbers well over 1000 entered in, but I will add that the fuel map looks pretty average to me, but I am no expert

I am trying to find a english manual so I can work out all the functions in the hand controller

Chris

Chris

Looking forward to seeing this result... just went and got me a set of gtr injectors :D

I am going to be taking alot of pictures so in the future if someone wants to do the same it will be pretty straight forward

Don't forget to get the resistor pack!

Chris

so is it right to say that your tune is more for response compared to boostd which was more for top end???? This is what i'm gathering from comparing the two or its not a fair comparison (rb20 vs rb25)????

This is pretty interesting!!

so is it right to say that your tune is more for response compared to boostd which was more for top end???? This is what i'm gathering from comparing the two or its not a fair comparison (rb20 vs rb25)????

This is pretty interesting!!

I have no idea whats mines tuned for, I plugged it in, it started, I turned it off.

I copied the maps from it and that was it, my car is currently running on the stock (chipped) ecu

It will be interesting to compare it with what Roy and R31POWER's maps are like, especially the differant fuel maps

Chris

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...