Jump to content
SAU Community

The annual SAU Dyno Day - Register your interest NOW


Recommended Posts

Don't worry Lach I've already tee'd Shaun up to give us an 80rwkw bonus as home court advantage :D Even if Steve still pips up we'll jump back on thre dyno and add a bit more X factor:D

I can see it now...

Freebaggin 1st run - 280rwkw

Grepin 1st run - 290rwkw

Whatsisname 1st run - 290rwkw

Steve 1st run - 340rwkw

Freebaggin & whatsisname whisper to Shaun.......

Freebaggin 2nd run - 365rwkw - nice improvement there mate!

Whatsisname 2nd run - 365rwkw - oh look at that neck & neck!

Equal first winners :D

  • Replies 228
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Excellent mate, a bit of brains and thoroughness makes the difference eh.

absolutely

whatsisname, if you really want to beat me all you need to do is turn my boost down when I am not looking, then remove my hand controller - dont even have to bodge figures - or, you could just block off my CAI intake pipe during the run:) that should do it.

Naa bodging figures is easiest :D

But in all seriousness, it's really good to see your package making the numbers it's capable of. I knew it had plently in it back when you showed me the previous dyno print out, it was rich as hell! Go the RB25DET's

Looking forward to it for sure, but What's, your right, gotta be some favouratism thrown in there.....can't have these bloody last minute ring-ins "winning" :thumbdwn:

thanks Matt, I just had a look at the previous dyno on you thread, and the bottom end and midrange looks alot different, certainly feels different.

also, to appease one of our mods:):(

***Please Note****

Dyno Day is on the 6th of March.

T-man, you still good for bringing the BBQ?

Enrico, you still good with the TV?

Also, does anyone have esky space for some sausages? or perhaps I can just put them in the sun to pre-cook?:D

Cheeky I understand that there is more to life then cars and I never stated otherwise but it is comon to have problems with relationships when cars are involved thats all. And if you wanted people to mind there own buisness on the forum you should hold back information about it then. Not trying to cause trouble but I hope you understand I do it sucks when things go down hill but please if you bring up your relationship in a public forum excpect things to be said, that is all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...