Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Today my R33 GTR started making a weird sucking noise.

It has pod filters, but the sucking is not coming from them. The noise happens both while stationary (idleling) and also when driving.

It sounds like it is coming from the front of the engine bay but cant pin point it.

It dosnt get louder or quieter depending on speed/RPM's etc. is always sounds the same.

It sounds like a valve opening/closing and sucking air.

I have not done any work on the car since buying it so it has started out of the blue.

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/345027-strange-sucking-noise/
Share on other sites

Some more info that may help.

One of the belts was making a squeale on startup when cold, but would go away within 1 minute.

The morning the noise started the car backfired once but not after that.

Also the car still runs fine, both in gear and at idle, no hesitation no other starnge noises.

Timing belt was done not that long ago, maybe 8 months ago I believe.

Have searched this forum as well as other and Google and can not find anything similar.

Started the car for the first time since the noise started, a couple things I noted.

The squeal that used to be there is still there but for a lot less longer.

Also, the noise didnt start immediately, it took about a minute or 2 of the engine idleing for it to start.

Were the tensioner and idler bearings replaced when the timing belt was?

Your other squeal could be a strecthed belt, either alternator, a/c or power steering. If the were replaced at the same time as the timing belt they could have strecthed a couple of mm's.

Were the tensioner and idler bearings replaced when the timing belt was?

Your other squeal could be a strecthed belt, either alternator, a/c or power steering. If the were replaced at the same time as the timing belt they could have strecthed a couple of mm's.

Not sure if any of the other parts were replaced when the timing belt was.

Would any of these lead to this sucking noise?

When I say sucking, that is what it sounds like, not sure if it is actually something sucking in air.

Just had a bit more of a look around.

I think it is coming from under the cover where the cam gears are. You can feel it kind of knock when you put your hand on it when it makes the noise.

Any ideas?

I would be very wary of starting the engine if there is knock coming from under there ;)

It's a bit painful but are you able to take the cam gear cover off and make sure the timing belt is looking ok? Very hard to diagnose over the internet but maybe a fraying timing belt whipping around might cause something like the sound you are describing.

I would be checking all the critical things first before proceeding.

I would be very wary of starting the engine if there is knock coming from under there :P

It's a bit painful but are you able to take the cam gear cover off and make sure the timing belt is looking ok? Very hard to diagnose over the internet but maybe a fraying timing belt whipping around might cause something like the sound you are describing.

I would be checking all the critical things first before proceeding.

Yeah, I am very wary!!

I have not looked at taking the cover off and what is involved (i.e. do I need to take the radiator fan out etc.), not sure how hard or what tools are required.

I am pretty sure it is something to do with one of the belts. Like I said, I started last night because I wanted to see if it still made the squeal and it did but only for a second. Before it would squeal for a minute or so until it warmed up.

If the timing belt slipped, even a notch it would run the same correct? it still runs like it always has, just this noise!!

The timing belt wont squeal. The squealling noise is 1 of the other belts. As ol mate said, take the top timing cover off and inspect the belt. If you can feel a knock from their, it's got to be inside. If you are not capable of doing it, i'd get a mechanic to do it before something goes really bad.

  • 3 weeks later...

Well it turns out the car never had it's 100,000K service.

Workshop replaced the idler bearing (which was the culprit for the noise and mechanic said was missing half the ball bearing and he was surpised it was still spinning, also replcaed the tensioner, timing belt.

Radiator was also flushed and pressure tested, turned out to be 70% blocked.

While in the shop also had the boost restrictor removed and timing adjusted to suit BP Ultimate. Also had a service, all oils etc.

First Dyno result they did saw it making 230hp at all four wheels, end result was 288hp at all four wheels.

The car is stock except the pod filters and the removal of the boost restrictor.

They said it would have made 300hp at all fours but the stock fuel pump started to struggle.

Sorry, that $1470 was for everything, not just the idler bearing. so it included:

Timing belt, idler bearing, tensioner, water pump.

Also included radiator flush, service (oils, oil filter) etc., removal of boost restrictor and adjustment of timing to suit BP Ultimate.

Included a couple Dyno runs as well.

Pretty good I think. Very happy with the result. Next will be upgraded turbos and exhaust system.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...