Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as the tital says i have just upgraded my suspention so the stock ones i took out are for sale

the cars done 137,000 kms

so

stock r34 gtt suspention $150

very cheap mate should sell quick!

cheers,mike

as the tital says i have just upgraded my suspention so the stock ones i took out are for sale

the cars done 137,000 kms

so

stock r34 gtt suspention $150

are they fit to R33. thanks

to be honest im not sure might have to ask some people on this site !

the front should be the same the back are for hicas cars !! ill post some pics if you want !

as the tital says i have just upgraded my suspention so the stock ones i took out are for sale

the cars done 137,000 kms

so

stock r34 gtt suspention $150

does it fit 2dr GTT?

check PM

pm sent

the r34 gtt sedan and coupe are the same

the fronts will fit and the back will fit if you a hicas rear !!

if you look at your rear suspention you will ether have the sturup type (like the ones in the pic) or different

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...