Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

PS3 is just fantastic, however after buying my copy of GT5 it feels like an Xbox game...... uncool. If the cars wont accelerate when I push the button then whats the point? I've played it once and I reckon I'll be trading it in...

Oh yeah, whats with that opening movie and that rubbish piano playing?? Then even after we endure this we have to put up with more crap music in the main menu and then some porn like sax playing during the rest of the menus!

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

PS3 is just fantastic, however after buying my copy of GT5 it feels like an Xbox game...... uncool. If the cars wont accelerate when I push the button then whats the point? I've played it once and I reckon I'll be trading it in...

Oh yeah, whats with that opening movie and that rubbish piano playing?? Then even after we endure this we have to put up with more crap music in the main menu and then some porn like sax playing during the rest of the menus!

So from what i gather GT5 = Fail???

I think the game is great! apart from the fact you cant change the wheels on the standard cars but im not complaining.

I was lucky my girlfriend bought me the Signature Edition for my birthday :) the R35 GT500 and 787B stealth cars are so damn fast and handle so well :)

the only thing I can complain about the game so far, Im still waiting for the DR30 to come up in the used cars :D

I think the game is great! apart from the fact you cant change the wheels on the standard cars but im not complaining.

i gave a mates copy a burl this morning. and that shit me no end. he got an r31 gtsr from the used car lot, and it will eternally wear hubcaps because its only a standard car. even in gt4 (which they ported the standard cars from) you could change the wheels on it.

the lack of ability to freely change the colour of the cars irked me also.

and the absolutely retarded ai...

... yeah. i wasnt impressed. forza 3 > gt5 imo. definitely not worthy of a 6 year wait.

Edited by scandyflick

cant judge, since ive never ever owned a console

but to comment on wow, fark... the new xpac is going to be ballistic, already the "pre-xpac patch" has completely re-written the book... the coolest thing about these mmorpg engines is that they can evolve the graphics within their virtual server as tech progresses... the wow of today has a shitload more graphical features than the wow of 5 years ago.... people like to joke about wow being addictive - well, its more addictive than smack. but crikey it hasnt got the same side effects. for starters, smack makes you skinny. warcrack makes you fat as f**k.

i guess its time for me to take up krav maga haha

-D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...