Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I'm going to be ordering a wideband O2 in the next 2 weeks and have found a really good price. Only really interested organising it for SA people as people will have to pick them up from me in Campbelltown, that way i don't have to stuff around with postage.

I have read a number of reviews and they are one of the best budget O2 sensor available. Generally they are around $250 mark. They also come with two gauge faces and two bezels so you can set them up to match your other gauges.

you can setup one of the output wires to simulate the factory Nerst cell (factory O2 sensor) signal so you can remove the factory O2 and just use the UEGO signal to control your ECU in closed loop.

Digital Wideband Air / Fuel Gauge

A wideband UEGO sensor controller accurately monitors Air/Fuel ratios (AFR) during the tuning process to prevent a lean fuel mixture, which could lead to engine damage. AEM has combined its single-channel wideband UEGO controller and gauge display into one unit, uniting unsurpassed AFR accuracy and control with an easy-to-read interface. AEM’s Gauge-Type Wideband UEGO Controller features a digital LED display and sweeping LED “needle” that changes colors as AFR changes from rich to lean. The unit’s 52mm (2-1/16”) gauge housing fits in most gauge pods and can be remotely mounted virtually anywhere.

  • Ideal AFR monitoring tool for EFI and carbureted applications, and engine dynamometers
  • Does not oscillate AFR reading like narrow band sensors
  • No laptop required for monitoring!
  • Bosch sensor included
  • Accurate to 0.1 AFR
  • Reads in AFR or Lambda via a switch in back of gauge housing
  • 24 Color-coded LED display lights provide immediate reference to engine’s air/fuel ratio (AFR) or Lambda ratio
  • Integrated three-digit display reveals AFR or Lambda in real time
  • User-programmable 0-5v analog output included for use with data loggers and virtually any engine management system
  • Serial data stream included for output of AFR (RS 232)

aemuegologo.jpg

Edited by heslo
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/345742-wideband-o2-sensor-aem-uego/
Share on other sites

Seems to be just power and earth is needed, the Sensor just clips in to a loom and if you are going to use the Wide band to simulate the narrow band signal then there is one other wire than need to be wired in, but since your running a GTR you would need two so i would suggest getting the bung welded into the dump where the two front pipes meet.

Here's the manual;

AEM_UEGO_Wide_Band_AFR_Installation_Instructions_30_4100.pdf

Still looking for cheaper prices, it's looking like they will be at or around the $200 mark from Australia. Hearing back from a dealer in the next couple days.

Edited by D_Stirls

Ok Guys i have found a seller in Australia and The price is $200 and the order will be put in at the end of this week or the beginning of next. So if you want to get in on this PM me and i'll send you that bank details.

I would prefer to have people pick them up but if you really need it to be posted i'll put it in an express post bag (which i think is $15).

I found out that the reason the international sellers wouldn't send them overseas was because the warranty only covers the country they are sold in; so if i brought them in from the states they wouldn't have a warranty.

So these have a warranty as they are from an Australian seller.

Ok Guys i have found a seller in Australia and The price is $200 and the order will be put in at the end of this week or the beginning of next. So if you want to get in on this PM me and i'll send you that bank details.

I would prefer to have people pick them up but if you really need it to be posted i'll put it in an express post bag (which i think is $15).

I found out that the reason the international sellers wouldn't send them overseas was because the warranty only covers the country they are sold in; so if i brought them in from the states they wouldn't have a warranty.

So these have a warranty as they are from an Australian seller.

Apparently PM are down for the time being.

Just email me on; [email protected]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...