Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

dsc05822q.jpg

This is the kinda core I'm using lads. I get where your coming from Scott. I guess I need to decide whether I want the car to look stock and have average power, or put in a conventional cooler kit and gain the missing power I should have, if thats the problem.

Hey i just tested one of these and it had a 6psi drop across it (20-30kw loss), have you tested boost before and after the cooler. Who is it from? the supplier was great and swapped it for another style.

thats why i keep saying spin it around backwards so compressor faces down not up..not sure how much room this will get you though it sure to be a good 10mm or so.. who wants a t67 on a stock manifold anyway thoug you might as well just get a td06...the extra power a t67 has to offer is only being wasted on the stock manifold..

there is always low mount options from 6-boost and such but whats the point in them, it just makes your turbo hard to work on...unless you can get a hks cast manifold that might work ok..

thats why i keep saying spin it around backwards so compressor faces down not up..not sure how much room this will get you though it sure to be a good 10mm or so.. who wants a t67 on a stock manifold anyway thoug you might as well just get a td06...the extra power a t67 has to offer is only being wasted on the stock manifold..

there is always low mount options from 6-boost and such but whats the point in them, it just makes your turbo hard to work on...unless you can get a hks cast manifold that might work ok..

EXACTLY TIMES TEN.

Hey i just tested one of these and it had a 6psi drop across it (20-30kw loss), have you tested boost before and after the cooler. Who is it from? the supplier was great and swapped it for another style.

They did some testing before on my first kando and it had a 2psi drop on low boost (I think under 10psi?) so I'd take it as the boost increases the drop will become worse.

I got it off CJauto I think off ebay, can't remember. I found myself a HKS return flow setup to replace it so hopefully I get that extra 20-30kw ... the Stagea needs it lol.

well i ran the 3582r low mounted with 10mm spacer, had heaps of room, now have t67 high mounted and i couldnt tell the difference in comp cover sizes both .70... either way run 15mm or bigger spacer. u still have a shit load of room 4 clearance underneth, u have 2 grind of a few heat shield lugs thats about it..

With my TD05-18G, had to use a 10mm spacer vs my old TD06-20G (no spacer), but thats because a TD05 exhaust housing is smaller so it brings the compressor housing closer to the exhaust manifold.

really...my td06 theres no way it would go on without a 10mm spacer...rb25 manifolds different maybe

With my TD05-18G, had to use a 10mm spacer vs my old TD06-20G (no spacer), but thats because a TD05 exhaust housing is smaller so it brings the compressor housing closer to the exhaust manifold.

interesting my td05-18g bolted straight on.

Mind you, my TD06 was the old (shitty) internal gate version. TD05 (external set up) was fouling the compressor housing on the exhaust manifold but about 2-3mm.

Status, what sort of clearance did you have with the TD05 bolted on interms of compressor to manifold?

Yeah his old TD06 was the 3 bolt internal gate type, the shoddy one we all steer clear of.

So now hes on par with everyone else, using a normal T3 Vband housing and the 3" comp cover. Thus using a 10mm spacer like the rest.


Kane how does the TD05H go compared to the old TD06H? Happy with the change?

Correct Scott.

Umm I seem to acheive full boost around 4200-4400 RPM, full boost being 22psi. So definately not as laggy as the old turbo. Very happy thus far. Will post dyno results once a Z32 has been added as the standard AFM is maxing out around 16-17psi..

Awesome dude, sounding really promising.

Maybe grab some cam gears while your on the job? Bring full song closer to the 4k mark, which for an RB20 making reasonable power is a good result :)

I'm sure it also feels a hell of a lot punchier once your moving too, and squirting it in and out of corners. Am anticipating 240kw, let us know how you fare!

haha you just reminded me of whats in my "draw of goodies"... JJR Cam Gears. Will get them and the Z32 in and tuned.

I would be happy with anything over 240 @ 22psi..

Definitely is more punchy, but haven't been able to give it abit of a squirt due to laziness lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...