Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Basically I put a power FC in my 34 GTR just to see if it works...and it does. When I put the standard computer back in the keys were now unsynced and I can't start the car, so I had to put the FC back in.

Nissan here is useless and don't know how to recode the keys and I am 1000k's away from somewhere to tune the FC. I will get it tuned..probably Marchish.

I have been told the main difference btween a factory ECU tune and a FC base map is mostly the timing as the fuel map is similar.

Attached is screens from my FC. My car is a basic pod/exhaust car so can anyone compare their maps if they have a similar state of mods and see if there is anything I can change?

post-412-0-88387200-1292981206_thumb.jpg

post-412-0-65257500-1292981251_thumb.jpg

post-412-0-92956100-1292981302_thumb.jpg

post-412-0-28729700-1292981346_thumb.jpg

post-412-0-55527300-1292981391_thumb.jpg

post-412-0-85987000-1292981452_thumb.jpg

post-412-0-43368800-1292981490_thumb.jpg

post-412-0-46718200-1292981533_thumb.jpg

post-412-0-00934500-1292981601_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348268-apexi-power-fc-base-map/
Share on other sites

as don data has said, the base map should be fine if you are normal and dont trash it and keep it on stock boost

using a "touched up" tune is just going to give you a false sense of "tuned" and youll trash it

putting the engine at risk and everything else. if it was me, stick with the base map, run low boost and get it done properly

status wouldnt suggest it if it wasnt safe paulr33....i think he knows what he is talking bout.. and would be more safe then any base map crap

This. That's a good offer from status. I believe that the Status tune will pretty much be the base map with far less aggressive timing, since timing is the thing that makes an untuned PFC unsafe.

no, they screw into a bung like the factory narrowband sensor. they can directly replace the stock one and still work with the factory ECU. however if you want to run a wideband o2 in the first place, there's a good chance you don't even use the factory ECU anymore...

stear clear of innovate. old ones are good but they're newer stuff is very unreliable and buggy.

Yeah my LC-1 has a recurring bug, but i 'downgraded' to the old firmware and works like a treat.

having known this before i would've gone for a AEM UEGO, but at the end of the day, i've got a wideband that works fine, just took a little more fuckin around.

Sorry. I'm sort of confused. Wouldn't it be waaaaay easier to have a device to check air fuel ratio's without changing the factory setup which may affect the way it is tuned to start with. I always see tuners use simple ones you clip to the tail pipe and do an on the spot reading. Wouldn't a gte computer use the sensors for tuning. Why would I replace one just for a stand alone meter??

standard o2 sensor is only used during light load cruising at a constant throttle. with all aftermarket computers you can and should turn it off completely whilst tuning anyway (which is when you'd be using a wideband) so its very easy to use it in the standard spot. tailpipe clips are easier for tuners because its quicker and the dynos setup that way, on the road its easier in the standard spot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...