Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone!

I recently purchased an R34 GT-R :laugh: having owned a R33 GTS-t before i always loved the skyline!

Im planning on modifying just about everything and looking to have a nice tuff streetable and semi trackable GT-R by the end of it.

The car is a 1999 R34 GT-R V-Spec in factory white purchased from a private sale (carsales.com.au) car is very clean apart from a couple of very very minor things which nobody else would care about but me (im very picky i guess) they are easy DIY fixes,

but im very happy with the car money well spent in my eyes.

The car has done about 100000kms, the stock cluster was replaced with a nismo cluster at 80000kms

Its mostly stock with a few tastefull mods:

  • Apexi Power FC D-Jetro
  • Apexi N1 Evolution catback exhaust
  • Apexi Super induction kit
  • HKS EVC boost controller
  • HKS turbo timer Type 1
  • Skylab TSC
  • Nismo 330f steering wheel with works bell boss and quick release
  • Nismo 320km/h cluster
  • Nismo multifunction display
  • Nismo super coppermix twin plate clutch and flywheel (im very impressed with this clutch, its very light and easy to use, you wouldnt even know it was a twin plate)
  • Nismo side skirts and rear pods
  • Nismo LED Tailights
  • Nismo braided brake lines
  • Project Mu slotted rotors and pads
  • BJ Union HID Lights
  • Ganador Mirrors
  • Tein Super Street Coilovers

and a few other bits and pieces not really worth mentioning.

focusing on one area at a time first things first...

Ive decided to build the engine straight up because im a little bored of the factory power, im looking for something responsive and streetable, but something that can be violent at the same time, and reliable ofcourse.

Most of these ideas came from friends who have done this before, this is my first build.

Ive chosen the RB30, then got talked into stroking it to a 3.2l for the extra torque and a T04Z for some response hopefully.

Some of the parts are as follows...

  • Prepped RB30 block
  • Prepped RB26 head
  • Nitto 3.2l Stroker Kit
  • Nitto oil pump
  • N1 water pump
  • Tomei Procams 280 degree 11.5 IN and EX
  • Tomei cam pulleys
  • Darton sleeves
  • Supertech valves, springs, etc
  • 6boost exhaust manifold
  • Hypertune intake manifold <---- Still to be orderd
  • Rips Crank Girdle
  • Garrett T04Z .82 rear
  • Turbosmart 50mm Progate
  • Extended Sump

Engine is on the build, so it shouldnt be too far away unless we run into problems (knowing my luck) :dry:

it will be a little while before the engine goes in becuase i still need fuel system, intercooler, and so on.

While the engine is out i want to repaint the engine bay and have all the wiring hidden so everything is nice and neat.

Heres some photos from carsales.com of the car just before it arrived

Ive had it for about 3 months now :D and im very pleased

post-67868-0-67300200-1293084079_thumb.jpg

post-67868-0-95435000-1293084092_thumb.jpg

post-67868-0-53938900-1293084101_thumb.jpg

post-67868-0-62974400-1293084108_thumb.jpg

post-67868-0-72089000-1293084118_thumb.jpg

post-67868-0-46153900-1293084126_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/348395-r34-gt-r-project/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Subscribed!

Pretty dam huge cams for a stroker. Personally i'd be aiming for something more in the step 1+2 range, to keep the usable torque band as wide as possible. Ive not read anything about the Nitto 3.2 kits before either. It would be interesting to know what the bore and stroke are that they are using.

Subscribed!

Pretty dam huge cams for a stroker. Personally i'd be aiming for something more in the step 1+2 range, to keep the usable torque band as wide as possible. Ive not read anything about the Nitto 3.2 kits before either. It would be interesting to know what the bore and stroke are that they are using.

+1, going to be one mental build

wow thanks for the quick reply guys :thumbsup:

i was told originally nitto was making a 3.4l aswell but it was scrapped and they are now only offering the 3.2l so i went with that

as for the bore and stroke of the kit im not sure to be honest but ill find out for you

the cams where recomended buy my friends, if they arnt suitable then they can always be changed i dont mind, like i said its my first build, but with people like you guys throwing me hints im sure ill be pointed in the right direction, its still a while before its going to be ready, plus i havent got the rest of the things i need like fuel system and so on...

ive learnt that all this building and modding is VERY EXPENSIVE pinch.gif lol its cost me an arm and a leg to get to where i am but i dont mind its been a bit of a dream of mine i want to get it out of my system!

thanks again for the quick reply and ill try and keep this as up to date as possible!

bore is 86.5mm and the stroke is 91mm pretty sure

I just found the kit on the high octane site and it says 90mm stroke x 87mm bore to make 3.212cc. Rod ratio is 1.69:1 with a 6" rod. At 8000 RPM that makes your piston speeds peak at 38.8m/s and an accelerate rate from TDC/BDC of 40.2m/s^2.

I suspect the reason Nitto abandoned the 3.4 project would be that piston speeds get pretty crazy with the 95mm stroke (43m/s^2 acceleration rate). But more importantly there is less material overlap between the mains and big ends which reduces crankshaft flexing and whipping.

The only way to make a 3.4 crank that would be as strong as a 3.2 or even a stock RB30 crank is to increase the diameter of the mains bearings another 5mm or so and then aligh bore the block block to support larger main bearings from something like a BMW or Ford Clevland engine. Oh boy are you taking big dollers then though. If I had to guess, RIPS probably did something like this with their 3.3lt engine.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...