Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for a turbo for a high compression, high flowing 3L motor (Subaru EZ30 horizontal 6) that will make 300awkw on as low boost as possible.

All the new single turbos suitable for that power range on low boost aren't very exciting in terms of compressor efficiency island width because they are all designed for high boost (eg. Garrett GTX, GT and BW EFR)

For example at 0.75 bar, the GT3582R is at least 68% efficient from 22lb/min to 48.5lb/min, a range of 26.5lb/min. The GTX3582R is from 22 to 54, a range of 32lb/min

BUT twin GT2860R 707160-5 is at least 68% efficient from 23lb/min to 62lb/min, a range of 39 lb/min! So it's efficiency starts at the same spot as the GT3582R but ends 14lb/min further!

I want this kind of thing out of a single turbo and I can't see ANY. Is there anything out there?

Edited by bradsm87
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350072-any-good-low-boost-single-turbo/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I wish I damn could but generally a turbo that can flow efficiently for 300kw at say 1.5 bar will struggle to efficiently flow 250rwkw at 0.75 bar, no matter how big the engine. Look at how the compressor maps move up and to the right instead of straight up.

Eg. a GT3076R will make 300rwkw no worries on an SR20 at 1.6 bar but it generally won't make 300rwkw on a 3l motor at 0.8 bar, u need a bigger turbo or more boost.

Also I can't push the turbo to it's very limits because charge air will get too hot because it's going on an unopened engine with 10.7:1 comp cast pistons so I wouldn't want it going past the 70% efficiency mark. It'll need E85 and low cool boost to stay alive!

Edited by bradsm87

I think you will struggle to find anything that will make the power you want at such low boost.

it could be done but would need to be up around the GT40 range. but the lag would out way the benefit of making 300awkw imo.

What about a GTX3582 twin scroll rear and 1.06 it should keep the heat out of it and will close to your power goal on E85..

problem is a GTX35 will be laggy as well. it might make the power but it isn't going to feel crisp at all. it will drive very lazy.

that's the problem with small displacement though really.

i doubt there is any normal turbo that can achieve such an aim on a 2.5L

problem is a GTX35 will be laggy as well. it might make the power but it isn't going to feel crisp at all. it will drive very lazy.

that's the problem with small displacement though really.

i doubt there is any normal turbo that can achieve such an aim on a 2.5L

In the OP he stated the engine is a EZ30 (3L),

but yeah it wont be an ideal set up but will give the numbers he wants and thats about it... :mellow:

Well they are on a 4ltr lol, that's s fair increase[ over a 3.

In the OP he stated the engine is a EZ30 (3L),

but yeah it wont be an ideal set up but will give the numbers he wants and thats about it... :mellow:

ah yr, missed that.

either way even with a 3ltr its not going to come easy.

the only way would perhaps be some hybrid turbo, and we all know the lucky dip that goes there.

how sure of this are you? al has a 3076 on his 3 litre and it makes tons of power everywhere and it makes over 300rwkw

why on earth would you go for a Gt35xx when a GT30xx will do what you want, earlier, more power everywhere and should have enough peak

are you saying the 3076 is too small? ref; "wont make 300rwkw at 0.8 bar, need bigger turbo or bigger boost"

if you size the housing correcly then this shouldnt be a problem

ie dont fit a mega small housing and choke, fit a larger size housing

issue is low boost as possible, thing is even with a 3Lwith a 3076 you are still looking at what, 18psi or so?

depends on ones definition of low, but in mine... that's now low, but there is no stantout alternative.

how sure of this are you? al has a 3076 on his 3 litre and it makes tons of power everywhere and it makes over 300rwkw

why on earth would you go for a Gt35xx when a GT30xx will do what you want, earlier, more power everywhere and should have enough peak

are you saying the 3076 is too small? ref; "wont make 300rwkw at 0.8 bar, need bigger turbo or bigger boost"

if you size the housing correcly then this shouldnt be a problem

ie dont fit a mega small housing and choke, fit a larger size housing

That only solves the problem on the exhaust side. The 76 compressor won't flow 300rwkw at 1 bar. U need to size up turbos to make same power on lower boost, regardless of engine size. eg. The Perrin EZ30 used a GT3582R to start with and made 300-320awkw with a GT3582R at 15 psi.

Looks like the extra cash for twin -5's might be worth it. It would allow shorter exhaust runners being a boxer engine, just a lot more stuffing round with oil/water lines and pipe work.

Edited by bradsm87

yeah agreed... when OP said low boost he meant really low .75Bar

If it was my car i would put the GTX35 on in. then see how much boost it can hanle :rofl:

might even make 400awkw :banana:

LOL at seeing how much boost cast 10.7:1 pistons and pinkey finger sized rods can take.

LOL at seeing how much boost cast 10.7:1 pistons and pinkey finger sized rods can take.

seriously though, your engine wont last forever making that sort of power and will need a rebuild before too long...

keep that in mind when choosing your turbo.

I know you didn't ask this, but IMHO you shouldn't be worrying about flowing over 50lb/min on .8bar - even on an EZ30, unless you have got pretty fancy with it. Also if you are going to be using a lowish boost level and E85, a few points of compressor efficiency aren't going to break the thing - I'd be worrying more about minimal exhaust manifold pressure.

Look at the compressor map for the Borg Warner S300SX 83-75, I would be leaning towards one of those with the 1.00a/r twin scroll T4 turbine housing if I were doing what you are looking at doing.

People have done cool things with low boost on EZ30s but they are pretty fragile. A mate of mine actually has a forged/turbocharged EG33 in a GC8 which so far makes pretty decent power on low boost though its pretty hard to keep cool haha.

-9 would be the better choice for 300 wouldn't they?

roughly around the 15psi mark is all you should need given a 2.6 needs around 18

this is all subjective as head and flow have a fair factor here too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...