Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey, I need some help installing a Bosch 044 (in-tank) into a S2 R33 GTSt.

I know roughly what needs to be done, but would like some help from someone who has done a pump install themselves. Obviously, I'm happy to reimburse you for the time taken ($$$ OR :cheers:).

I'm located in S.E of VIC but I'm happy to drive to you (unless you're on the border of NSW and VIC, which in that case I'm going to decline unfortunatley)

Either reply or PM me if you're able to help me out :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/351494-help-installing-fuel-pump/
Share on other sites

Have a read through all the DIY fuel pump installs, Its a pretty easy job. If you know how to work a spanner give it a go yourself :-)

Hey mate, thanks for the heads up, but I've read through the DIY/Tutorials (before I began researching, I had ZERO idea on fuel pumps and how to do anything regarding it, but after scouring the forums, I know how to do it but need that little bit of confidence that someone experienced can bring lol). Cheers for the suggestion anyway :)

Isn't the 044 an external pump? Or are you planning on mounting it in tank?

Hey mate, yep it's an external one but I'm mounting it in tank. Quite a few people are getting great results using it in tank as it allows you to use a standard sock arrangement (would of chose 040 but I'm not a fan of the metal gauze bottom, which can't use the standard sock arrangment).

So for me, it was either the 044 in tank or the Walbro...... (p.s I've read ALOT of topics about Walbros and in almost all of them, you always appear and mention how it failed on you LOL :P )

Edited by turbodragon

Is the 044 physically bigger than the 040? Cause the 040 was a real tight squeeze to fit it in. It's not a difficult job just

time consuming unless you have little arms and x-ray vision :)

My 040 actually sits lower in the tank than the standard arrangment, which gives me a few more miles til empty...so I praise the metal gauze!

Is the 044 physically bigger than the 040? Cause the 040 was a real tight squeeze to fit it in. It's not a difficult job just

time consuming unless you have little arms and x-ray vision :)

My 040 actually sits lower in the tank than the standard arrangment, which gives me a few more miles til empty...so I praise the metal gauze!

I'm not sure to be honest! But I'd presume it would be slightly bigger as the 044 weighs 1030grams whilst the 040 weighs 930grams.

Ahhhh k the, yeah I read one way to get around the 1/4 tank problem is to run the 040 lower, but you run the risk of sucking up all the crap on the bottom of the tank?

never heard of a 1/4 of a tank problem?

and the pump always sucks from the bottom, so there is no "sucking crap up from the bottom" as, it always sucks from the bottom

I've read that some people get problems with running with 1/4 tank or conrnering as the pick up isn't low enough so it starves and cuts out.

The mesh on the sock of standard pump is much finer than the metal gauze of the 040 isnt it?

i've got a Bosch 040 installed, don't seem to have this 1/4 problem - works fine.

Anyway, i was under the impression that the 044 is a much larger pump ment to be mounted externally of the fuel tank ? I had abit of trouble getting the bosch 040 onto the stock fuel pump bracket cos it was too fat from memory... not sure if the 044 is fatter?

Edited by shaun123

1/4 fuel tank problem sounds like a problem someone who didn't mount the pump low enough in the tank would have. You do need to cut the fuel pump bracket and hose clamp the pump to make it fit.

Metal gauze on the 040 is plenty fine. They wouldn't put on a gauze that was going to stuff up the pump with debris...sounds like you've been reading reviews from paranoid androids :)

There's really not that much stuff at the bottom of the tank anyway. If you're worried about it, clean out the tank with a syphon. My 040 sits touching the bottom of the tank and I have no debris related fuelling issues. Didn't clean out the tank, haven't even changed my fuel filter yet (though a new filter is recommended at some point after a pump change). But if you've already bought the 044, well now we have to work out how to mount it in tank :miner:

i've got a Bosch 040 installed, don't seem to have this 1/4 problem - works fine.

Anyway, i was under the impression that the 044 is a much larger pump ment to be mounted externally of the fuel tank ? I had abit of trouble getting the bosch 040 onto the stock fuel pump bracket cos it was too fat from memory... not sure if the 044 is fatter?

Oh ok then, fairrr enough. Yeah, the 044 is slightly larger and it's meant for external mounting but the only reason I've gone for it was because I get to use the sock attachment lol

1/4 fuel tank problem sounds like a problem someone who didn't mount the pump low enough in the tank would have. You do need to cut the fuel pump bracket and hose clamp the pump to make it fit.

Metal gauze on the 040 is plenty fine. They wouldn't put on a gauze that was going to stuff up the pump with debris...sounds like you've been reading reviews from paranoid androids :)

There's really not that much stuff at the bottom of the tank anyway. If you're worried about it, clean out the tank with a syphon. My 040 sits touching the bottom of the tank and I have no debris related fuelling issues. Didn't clean out the tank, haven't even changed my fuel filter yet (though a new filter is recommended at some point after a pump change). But if you've already bought the 044, well now we have to work out how to mount it in tank :miner:

Hmmm..... that's kinda annoying for me then, cos after reading other people's experiences with them, they were complaing about it so I opted for the 044 LOL DAMN IT!! Hahahaha

I've got the 044 on order but it hasn't been dispatched yet, so do you think I should get them to change it over for the 040 instead, provided it's possible by them? Or should I just stick with the 044 and get it to fit by working at the bracket?

I highly doubt I'd find the limits of the 040, let alone the 044 (aiming for only 200rwkw until the turbo gives way and a high flow is needed). Like I said, only reason I went the 044 over the 040 (and Walbro) was because I could use the sock attachment lol

doesnt walboro use a sock? you should of got a walboro pump if you wanted the sock

Yeah, the Walbro does use a sock but I've read more negatives than positives from other people's experiances. Otherwise, I woulda went the the Walbro hehe

Anywayy, I called up Bosch and they don't recommend that the 044 be used in-tank as it can't be submerged in fuel and to go the 040, yet there's quite a few people who have done so with no problems.

All these dilemmas on me wanting just an upgraded fuel pump. FML.

Oh, and the 040 is the same diameter as the 044 (60mm). Only difference in size is that the 044 is 196mm versus the 040 at 169mm.

I got no experience installing an 044 in-tank, so can't really comment on whether you should cancel your 044 for a 040, but if you want to play it safe I would...because we at least know the 040 will drop straight in with a few adjustments (a hacksaw, a fuel hose and a solder of the terminals), which you would probably have to do anyway to get the 044 to fit in-tank.

Plenty of people running 300rwkw+ on the 040, you'll be fine with one of these.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...