Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys im just wondering if i can compare power outputs for rb20det's with std cams etc but with things like a turbo,cooler,ecu,exhaust etc.... but im keen to see what ppl have done for good increases and what they have done that has not been so beneficial.....

to get things moving i have a completely internally std rb20det with a ~500hp roller bearing turbo(int gate), microtech lt12 plug in ecu ,3 inch mandrel bent zorst with 1 muffler and no cat,hybrid 600x300x76 cooler,gtr n1 injectors and malipassi reg... they are the major mods and it has around 300rwhp on 1 bar of boost on a hot day...... its not a hell fast car at the moment but its enough to have fun.... the car is still very driveable off boost and has 1 bar boost by 3500rpm or so....

keen to see others outputs please be realistic with hp and boost ratings cause im using this as a tool to compare eachothers mods to help other ppl make decisions on what mods to under take if they wanna persue hp.....

cheers guys Jon :flamed:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35221-power-outputs-for-modded-rb20dets/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i've got an rb20det, internally stock, stock injectors and AFM, SAFC, HKS 2530, Greddy 600x300x65 fmic, Grex oil cooler, 3" single dump and front, 3" hi-flow cat, 3.5" Apexi N1 catback, GTR fuel pump, rising rate fuel reg. Should be together and running this week and from all the research i've done i should make 300rwhp @ 1.2bar.

Hey Dude, i have a int stard rb20 with a crappy truck cooler, vg30 hi flow turbo, mines remap ecu, gtr fuel pump, pod full 3 inch and profec a boost controller on about 1.2 bar ive done a 12.6 at around 113-116 mph . The most ive gotten on a dyno is is 290, that hit a phantom cut at around 6500 witht he line still going up, so i recon i got around 300 rwhp.

Hope this helps.

Btw i have no broken ring lands :D

Hi WhiteR32, we use a ball bearing hi flowed RB25DET turbo on our old RB20DET for a consistent 220 rwkw (295 rwhp or 370 bhp) at 1.3 bar. This turbo and its support systems holds more than 1 bar of boost from 4,000 rpm to 8,000 rpm, so it is never off boost on gear changes. We have found this is the most airflow (max power) we can get and keep the rpm range useable. We have a few more mods than you have listed, split dump, 3.5 inch exhaust, no cat (it's a race car), GTR cams, Z32 fuel pump, adjustable pulleys, Power FC with boost controller, POD filter, heat shield and a substantial ambient air feed. The intercooler is a standard R32 GTR one with my design of pipework. The exhaust manifold was a copy of the R31 GTRS Group A manifold which has the turbo mounted low and rear for better weight distribution. As usual GCG did the hi flow. Oh and the engine is standard internally, 170,000 k's and never had the head off.

I have tried filling it up with Elf LMS, advancing the timing, up the boost to 1.4 bar and it made another 32 rwkw (252 rwkw) consistently. On one particularly cold morning last winter we hit 260 rwkw, but I haven't been able to duplicate it since.

Hope that helps

Hi, Mr GTS, forget the GTR plenum idea, it doesn't fit (different bolt patterns) and tests have confimrmed that you actually loose power. The runners and plenum volume are all wrong for 2 litres as they are deigned for 2.6 litres.

As for RB26 cams they fit RB20's, there is some benefit from adj pulleys as well. They do work beter if you also use the RB26 solid lifters to replace the RB20 Hydraulics. As for power increase, I have never done a bac kto back, but around 10 to 15 rwkw looks reasonable. That's max power increase but I think the average power increase would be more, maybe 20 to 25 rwkw.

Hope that helps

  • 3 weeks later...

Sydneykid or anyone that can shed some light, can you tell me if the GTR cams and solid lifters can be installed on an RB20 without removing the head...if not then i may just get some aftermarket cams and cam gears and stick with the hydraulic lifters.

Oh and if std GTR cams fir, then im assuming 264 9.1mm lift aftermarket GTR cams will aslo fit???

Hi Roy, GTR cams fit with the RB20 hydraulic followers. The hydraulic followers are supplied with oil from a galley in the head via a hole to the follower. We weld up the holes, remachine the bores and lower the amount of oil supplied to the head by blocking off one of the oil supply holes from the block to the head. This is all done with the head off. I don't think you could do it with the head on.

But I don't think you need to change to solids anyway. The bottom end rpm limit is more of an issue than the hydraulic follower rpm limit.

The idea of using standard GTR cams is to get a noticeable benefit for not much cost in parts or labour. If you are going to the expense of aftermarket cams then buy hydraulic ones. Or remove the head and do the hydraulic to solid swap properly then you can use cheaper, used GTR cams. I think you will find the cost works out the same ie; the labour cost = the cheaper cost of used GTR cams.

Hope that helps

So i suppose the next question is what cams have been seen to work well in an RB20, ive seen plenty of Jap cars run 264 cams but im not sure what lift. Are they the middle ground cams for streetability / performance increase on an RB20?

Im running std internals, with a 8,400rpm rev limit with a TD06-20G that is making power between 4,500rpm and the rev limit. Ideally looking for something that gives a little more mid range then top end...

Rb20 turbo

Standard internals

Microtech LTX8

FMIC

Full custom turbo back 3 inch exhaust with tanbae muffler and split wastegate

Pod

Running on 10psi, sitting on about 150rwkw

Getting rebuild soon :) .... but putting forgies in :) and will get spare rb25 turbo hi flowed , so ill see what happens .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...