Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as title states whats the max power for the standard 26 block, is there a ruff figure or is it one of those, how long is a piece of string. It has a HKS stroker crank so harmonics at high rpm shouldn't be too bad, putting 710awhp at hubs so maybe 800ish at the fly. reason I ask is I'm looking at a freshn-up -rebuild and wondering if I need to factor an N1 into the equation..

while I'm at it, car has 1000cc injectors and 1000hp fuel system in the boot, but still running standard hard lines between, are they going to flow enough for that system and that power especially with continued WOT around the track, hense the rebuild, just trying to work out how we got piston damage --dentonation due to bad fuel or tune, or leaning out due to restricted flow? no problems on dyno with flow just wondering if real world and continued WOT might be different.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/354935-max-power-for-rb26-block/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Personally I feel that the standard 5/16" fuel line is too small for that power, I would be running either 2 3/8" feeds (if you have a twin entry rail) or a single 1/2" and a 5/8" return.

yeah it is twin entry HKS 11mm rail and HKS 1000 injectors

twin pumps feeding the surge tank and twin pumps out of the surge tank?

not sure, I bought this car off SLY33 who started the RB26 dyno thread, its a full "magnaflow" system with one 525pro out, can't see whats in the tank.. it was all done by Nisspeed, and he does quite a few big power motors, the system was built to handle 1000hp ??

what im getting at is that a lot of surge tank setups are built with ample fuel supply from the surge tank to the engine. but when you stick it on a track that has long stretches of sustained WOT (without a large enough lift pump) you can run out of fuel in the surge tank itself and lose fuel pressure

what im getting at is that a lot of surge tank setups are built with ample fuel supply from the surge tank to the engine. but when you stick it on a track that has long stretches of sustained WOT (without a large enough lift pump) you can run out of fuel in the surge tank itself and lose fuel pressure

ok got ya, so I'll check what lift pumps I have, do I need the lift pump/s to, equal or more flow than the pump from surge tank to engine?

also, what about the standard block question, anyone, or is it just not an issue and people have no issues putting decent power through the standard block??

Depends on a lot of things mate, how hard are you revving it, Have you increased bore in rebuild etc etc ?

It would definately be getting a bore this time due to some marking of the cylinder from damaged ring land, and rev limit set at 8500rpm but see's that regularly, might consider taking that a bit higher as crank is good for at least 9k

there is no problem using a standard block with that power. if there's nothing wrong with it that a bore won't cure then don't replace it. but question. what size was the bore taken to last time? if it has a stroker crank I'm assuming it had forged pistons. they were most like one size over (86.5) or even 2 sizes over (87mm). if so then boring to 87.5mm is not a good idea for a big power engine. ideally you want to stick with 86mm or 86.5mm.

N1 block is a good idea but I wouldn't rush to buy one if you are not having block problems so far. on the other hand if you need to buy a brand new block (due to this one having already been over-bored) then I'd go straight for the N1.

there is no problem using a standard block with that power. if there's nothing wrong with it that a bore won't cure then don't replace it. but question. what size was the bore taken to last time? if it has a stroker crank I'm assuming it had forged pistons. they were most like one size over (86.5) or even 2 sizes over (87mm). if so then boring to 87.5mm is not a good idea for a big power engine. ideally you want to stick with 86mm or 86.5mm.

N1 block is a good idea but I wouldn't rush to buy one if you are not having block problems so far. on the other hand if you need to buy a brand new block (due to this one having already been over-bored) then I'd go straight for the N1.

thanks Baron thats the kind of pearl I was after

another option. if you have a good block (bore wise) but worried about strength look at the Platinum racing PREC. they are made as a block brace mainly to suit RB30 blocks fitted with RB26 sumps but they also do an RB26 version which purely acts as a block brace. it strengthens the girdle but retains the standard mains. it also attaches to the girdle with it's own fasteners (not re-using the factory mains) so you basically end up with the strength 4 bolt mains. it also adds torsional rigidity to the block which will stop them cracking between 3 and 4 as they are a bit prone to do. cost from memory is around $1200 so it's a lot cheaper than buying an N1 block and possibly much stronger. hi-octane retail them, or otherwise contact envy imports who designed them.

another option. if you have a good block (bore wise) but worried about strength look at the Platinum racing PREC. they are made as a block brace mainly to suit RB30 blocks fitted with RB26 sumps but they also do an RB26 version which purely acts as a block brace. it strengthens the girdle but retains the standard mains. it also attaches to the girdle with it's own fasteners (not re-using the factory mains) so you basically end up with the strength 4 bolt mains. it also adds torsional rigidity to the block which will stop them cracking between 3 and 4 as they are a bit prone to do. cost from memory is around $1200 so it's a lot cheaper than buying an N1 block and possibly much stronger. hi-octane retail them, or otherwise contact envy imports who designed them.

another good option, if I go with the standard block, that would be good insurance

cheers

wow thats at least hlaf the cost of an entire N1 block ?? aren't there other improvements to be had with the N1 block--oil gallerys etc

and will this increase the height of the block, giving similar issues as the 30/26 with bonnet and crossmember clearances ??

yep works with factory girdle. so does the 30 block/26 sump version. it acts as the sump adapter and block strengthener in one thing. I have seen other guys go to billet mains and chuck out the stock girdle which is a backwards step in my eyes. I saw an engine recently pulled down (a 30/26) with custom mains and girdle with a brack kind of like the PREC but it had bad bearing wear from crank walk.

how this one works is the factory girdle gets a flat surface machined into it (any competent machinist can do it). the girdle is still proud of the block (obviously) and you are mounting the PREC to the block factory sump bolts, and then it also bolts to the factory girdle (but not interfering with the factory main bolts). the 26 sump then bolts to the PREC and from memory you have a few bolts that go through both sump and PREC for more strength. it's a nice piece of gear.

Does look like its designed to replace the factory main caps

nope, as above it works WITH factory main caps and girdle. just with a flat surface machined onto the bottom of the girdle for the PREC to mate with.

if you want to buy one direct contact herman @ envy imports (they are Platinum Racing products).

if anyone's really interested I have the instruction manual here somewhere I can email you. it explains how to fit one and thereby explains how it works. the extra width gives you a bit more sump oil too (need to consider spacing or lengthening oil pick-up a little if no sump baffles etc are fitted - many just go external pick-up anyway though).

wow thats at least hlaf the cost of an entire N1 block ?? aren't there other improvements to be had with the N1 block--oil gallerys etc

and will this increase the height of the block, giving similar issues as the 30/26 with bonnet and crossmember clearances ??

does not increase block height at all (engine mounts fit to block not sump so engine is still exactly mounted the same). but DOES lower sump a little (very small amount - 20mm or less from memory, basically just the thickness of the PREC).

yeah they are a great way to get some block strength for a big power 26 or 26/30 without having to pay for N1 block or the other option till now as grout fill the block (not practical for a road car or circuit car, really for drag only).

even better if you are going to a 26/30 as in that case you need to spend $800-$1000 on a sump adapter anyway. spending a little more on one of these and it does the sump adapter job as well as more strength.

does not increase block height at all (engine mounts fit to block not sump so engine is still exactly mounted the same). but DOES lower sump a little (very small amount - 20mm or less from memory, basically just the thickness of the PREC).

yeah they are a great way to get some block strength for a big power 26 or 26/30 without having to pay for N1 block or the other option till now as grout fill the block (not practical for a road car or circuit car, really for drag only).

even better if you are going to a 26/30 as in that case you need to spend $800-$1000 on a sump adapter anyway. spending a little more on one of these and it does the sump adapter job as well as more strength.

am I right that the same PREC can be used for strenghtening the 26 and or adapting the 30 block and 26 sump, as I may go 26/30 road down the track, or are they two completely different plates

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...