Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...

lol damn, was some misinformation d1nz!!!

got the stuff from the gtr now but clutchslave won't fit rb20 gearbox, clutchmaster is too big and won't fit in the stock-clutch holes, gotta drill some new holes or just a stock cefiro clutchmaster...

clutchpedals fits surprised straight on, but the pedal is too near to the brakepedal what makes it stupid, gotta bend the pedal a bit out of the way from the brake.

on my A31 the driver sits on right side, don't know maybe there's a difference that the stuff i got didn't fit...

Hey M8, Just cut the Auto brake pedal on the left side to make it the right width and put a pk screw through the pedal rubber to hold it on looks dk and works perfectly. Jamind, A31 SE4

i already cut the brakepedal and its rubberthing down^^

i also bend the clutchpedal straight that its not that bad close to the brakepedal and looks natural :whistling:

all this is just for a 32 gtr clutchpedal! other models are different...

btw r32 gtr clutchpedal got a booster too, it won't fit right in it needs modification for that, i just used a r32 gtst clutchmaster cylinder it fit right in(a31 clutchmaster is the same)

if somebody want pictures tell me...

so my non turbo cefiro rear brakes matched up to be same as the,

Bendix Part Number:

DB1144 - REAR

does this mean;

-rb20e

-rb20de

-rb20det

-rb25de

modeled cefiro's all come with rear turbo brakes?

just to add my front non turbo brakes were slightly bigger then sr20de front caliper, but smaller then the sr20det caliper

Edited by Dan_J

You'd prob be right about Thailand, Asia (ex. Japan), South American, etc Cefiro's (all LHD).

What about the LATE late model ones. LHD Laurels and Cefiro's were made and sold up to 1997, and sometime between 94-97 they came factory with 5 stud.

My understanding was all Cefiro's, from 20E to 25DE came with the same brakes front and back, which are very similar to SR20 brakes but not interchangeable.

I've offered my whole brake setup for free to couple of Sil owners and they rejected, claiming it's different to SR brakes...

Beats me. Skyline brake upgrade FTW.

Edited by Nic_A31
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

reason i ask is that i swaped what i now believe are s2/3 round plug coil packs for the spare set of r32 rb20 i had laying around into my engine.

now i started to get the missfire above 4-6k where as my original ones did not missfire even tho the r32 ones looked in better condition and even had 'coils' on the end of them unlike my cefiro ones which where burnt out

so ceffy coils stamped 185 / 135 / 1xx

and r32 coil 3xx

?

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

was it like that when u got it? could be the central locking unit or the brake light relay somehow.... something in the boot, have a look around

Hey Dan.

yeah the central locking has never worked.. the drivers side rear door will do the auto lock thing at above 20kph and will lock when i lock the drivers door. but wont unlock and no other door will lock or unlock.

brake light relay you say?? how so?

also ive noticed lately that while im driving around there is a clickin coming from the passenger side door, not sure if front or rear.

but basically its the same clickin that happens if i press the door lock button on the drivers door handle.

well awhile ago i swapped my brake light relay unit with another similar looking unit i had laying around( which i found out to be a r33 relay of some kind ) which made my central locking not work at all.

so just swap the long black brake light relay thats mounted on your boot wall with your c33 mate

  • 2 weeks later...

The tailshaft just depends on if its ABS or non ABS.

R33 diffs can fit. The 5 bolt axles are a direct fit into the existing hubs.

Most Cefiro's have a 4.36:1 ratio, so S13, diffs are the go.

If you want to use another ratio, you'll need to get the speedo drive from the same vehicle and chuck that into your box, so your speedo stays in sync.

hey dan.

another question about the central lockin in the laurel..

i was at a local wrecker the other day and found a ceffy. its mostly gone but the lock acuators were still there so i grabbed em.

went to put them in but they are way different.

so i decided to see if i could figure out why mine dont work.

and it seems that its the acuators them selves that are f**ked as wen i plugged in the ceffy one it would work.

so i took them out and the arm that goes on the gear to the motor was really loose. pulled them apart and couldnt figure out how they are ment to work. ended up figuring out that they use a spring.

anyways..

question. is it possible to fix them. if not do you know of any replacement for them?

cant say i know too much about the central locking actuators them self so i camt help there, although like any car u can get generic/brand name central locking kits with the actuators.

the only stuffing around is finding the right type that will mount with some mods and making sure it'll wire into the factory wiring and relay well.

not much help but i guess have a chat with a car security/alarm installer

yeah. hopefully i wont have to go down that path. bein doin a bit of research and it looks as tho r32/33 skyline actuators are the same/similar.

and from what i found when i was pullin mine out. they are universal fit.

ie the 1 actuator will fit every door as you can just flip it/turn it to suit what ever orientation is required.

fingers crossed. ill post up in the parts section if i get them to work

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...