Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Roy,

That's what I'm planning on doing but the questions are how much do I take off the head to retrieve the lost compression and how much CAN I take off the head before the pistons and the valves start having sex? ( Not actually asking because cause I get the feeling that nobody can actually answer those questions ).

rb20-calais,

Tried running more boost through the GT2530 but it seems peak efficiency is 1.4bar and anything after that is just hot air.

RedDrifter,

The GT2835 would have to be my choice also if I didn't know any better ( which I don't ).

Then the problems are 1: Do I get a GT2835, a GT2835R, a GT2835Pro or a GT2835ProS ?2: What wheel trim and A/R do I get and 3: How much is it going to cost ?.

Every day I get one step closer to selling this car !! :cheers:

thats very interesting a lot of people say the hks turbos are efficient @ 1.6bar+, the max boost i was going to run with the 2530 was 1.4bar so that makes me happy i have selected the right turbo. Could you tell me what power you made @ 1.4bar with the 2530 ?

Evan

On my stock motor ( before it went belly up ) with a programmed ECU and a set of 550cc injectors ( overkill ), GT-R fuel pump and pressure regulator, running 1 bar boost I was making 207.3 kw at the wheels. I never wound the boost up for fear of blowing the head gasket ( I'm told that 18psi is the smart maximum for a stock head gasket ) but then again I WAS happy with 207.3 so never saw the need to crank it any further.

Just my opinion but I think the GT2530 is one of the best turbo's available for the stock RB20DET and the GT2535 for the stock RB25DET.

On my stock motor ( before it went belly up ) with a programmed ECU and a set of 550cc injectors ( overkill ), GT-R fuel pump and pressure regulator, running 1 bar boost I was making 207.3 kw at the wheels. I never wound the boost up for fear of blowing the head gasket ( I'm told that 18psi is the smart maximum for a stock head gasket ) but then again I WAS happy with 207.3 so never saw the need to crank it any further.

Just my opinion but I think the GT2530 is one of the best turbo's available for the stock RB20DET and the GT2535 for the stock RB25DET.

What caused the need to rebuild it?

I am about to undertake the next phase of my project, as mine has been making 200rwkw for about 14 months now and I am bored with it, and I am hoping for around 220rwkw reliably out of the stock motor

My dillema is that is the motor dies is to either -

1) Rebuild my motor with forged pistons and INCREASE the CR to 9.0-1

2)Replace my motor with a low km one form the wreckers

3)Bin the RB20 and replace with RB25

So just interested in why it needed to be rebuilt

Regards, Chris

Roy,

Yes, the ECU was re-mapped on the dyno ( same dyno I always use ) and the tuner just couldn't get the power out of it.

Chris32,

I had to rebuild my motor as the number 4 big end bearing failed and the oil pump rear cover had come lose. Otherwise she was a sweet engine.

I've just been quoted 5,600 for a complete rebuild, bit more if i wanna chuck the tomei forgies in.
What does that include? Mild port/polish & rebuilt head?

My Rb30DET bottom end cost me $3738.50.

Crank, rods & block crack tested.

87mm Wiesco Forged pistons.

Blue Printed.

Balanced 1 to gram.

RB25DET Oil pump clearances checked & re-assembled WITH lock tight!!!

Head fitted & valve clearances checked.

Cam belt inc. fitting of it.

Tensioner relocated above water pump.

Cometic Metal headgasket (O-ring setup around bore).

The head was ported polished & rebuilt by Chris Milton Engineering. It cost me $880 + $80 because they missed a protruding exhaust valve seat in no. 5. (& they wonder why I didn't get the bottom end built there) + $275 for the vrs kit that contains the valve stem seals (if purchasing just the valve stem seals it will set you back $330 from memory) So get the VRS kit. It comes with complete top end gaskets (head gasket, plenum, exhaust, inlet etc).

So all up that would be $4973.50.

I found the little so called performance shops were so damn expensive it wasn't funny. I ended up going with a larger company 'City Dismantlers' that deal with everything from second hand parts, new parts, trimming, engine rebuilding & painting hence everything you can think of they do. They had new clean machinery. They had built up in the past many hi-po VL's with one that he mentioned made 718hp which used an aftermarket crank cradle, h-beam rods etc. He was also in the process of a supercharged 400 chev build that will run a cr of 7:1 and make some where well over 700hp.

I was quoted up to $5500 to have just the bottom end worked with the same specs as above.

So shop around.

Well,

Just to keep the info alive re my original problem, I've just found out that the 40 thou oversized Arias forgies that were fitted are 8.3:1 comp ratio. Most people are saying the stock is 8.5:1 but some are saying it's 8.7:1. I guess anyway you look at it, I need more air flow / boost so I guess I'm looking for a GT2535 :)

Does anyone know if the dump pipe that suits a stock turbo will suit a GT2535 ?

Also I guess the same question with regards to a GT2835Pro ?

Tilbrooks told me anything over a 2530 with a RB20t is pretty usless for the street. On the dyno loaded up in fourth it made full boost at 3700rpm. So on the street you could easily say maybe 4200rpm?!? Any one know where it makes say 1.1 bar accelerating from low rev's in second or third?

lag lag and more lag.

I hate lag. :)

Tilbrooks told me anything over a 2530 with a RB20t is pretty usless for the street. On the dyno loaded up in fourth it made full boost at 3700rpm. So on the street you could easily say maybe 4200rpm?!? Any one know where it makes say 1.1 bar accelerating from low rev's in second or third?

 

 

lag lag and more lag.

 

I hate lag. :)

Hmmm. Does the same go for a modified RB20 ? ( Keeping in mind I've had head work done and the pistons )

Put a stage 1 or 2 cam in it aswell and id say lag would be a lot less compared to a stock motor especially with your head being ported and all.

As for a GT2835proS the flange is fine I think(t3) but as for the exaust outlet I'm not sure.

Yer maybe slap a NA 232dur 7.3mm inlet cam and a 264 dur exhaust cam or maybe a 256 depends on what sort of results others have had with cams in the rb20t.

If it doesn't work to well then step up the inlet cam a little. Stepping up the inlet cam will generally loose power down low UNLESS it is something like a RB30 running RB25 cams then up to around 260dur inlet it will pick up power down low. Well thats what Dyno2003 says anyhow.

2530 is the the happy medium 'apparently'.

2535 isn't much bigger and would possible knock 240rwkw as i've heard 2530's making 230rwkw?!?! I don't really know though.

I dont think you can say a certain turbo is useless on the street-its really down to the driver and their needs.

My car is fine on the street with what I consider to be the biggest turbo you would use on a std RB20. Boost really kicks in around 4,500rpm, whilst under that its still has enough power to get around, id guess it would have about 70-90rwkws of boost which is plenty of power the get around...BUT not if you want to race around on the street, then it would be shocking to drive.

On the track though where the revs are always in the required range, then its not a problem. Im having to change my driving style a little, where on slow corners i now use 2nd gear and have to be mindful that while rowing back thru the gears i dont wash off too much corner speed. So whilst i would love a torque moster RB30, when i think about what i need my car to do it works fine for me.

Id say the little HKS 2530s are supposed to be good at high boost levels. so just keep winding boost into the engine while on the dyno until it stops making power. See how you go at 1.5 bar, with your upgraded fuel system and forged pistons and tuned ECU, you should be able to maintain the boost response of the smaller turbo with the airflow capabilities of running higher boost.

blah,blah, blah...basically give it a hit at 1.5-1.6bar to see if it makes the power you want from it, if nbot then think about other mods/turbos.

...oh and Joel do you want ot play with some cam specs for me, http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=35221

  • 2 weeks later...

Roy,

Pinging is not the problem. It's just not making the oomph. Anyway, I'm going to try another turbo which I think may help a long way towards fixing the problem ( it better !! ).

Will post the results if all goes well. If not, the car is history !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
    • I recently purchased a 2018 Infiniti Q60, which has an SD card navigation map. I can see my system has options for real time traffic updates etc, and am wondering if there is something I can purchase to get this working? I can see there are at least updated maps for USA and Canada, but nothing for Australia. Surely Infiniti took changing road systems and city expansions into account when they decided to use an inbuilt navigation over Android Auto/Apple Car Play, or are we doomed to drive on streets that don't exist in the navigation system if you drive to a new area?
    • Luckily I didn't put in etch primer as I just found out it's not compatible with my body filler lol. Also just need to sand the panel anywhere between 150-400 grit so I'm in the clear there. It does say to not apply to soft old paint, I assume that means paint that is flaking, peeling,etc
    • @dbm7 and @GTSBoy thank you both very much! will give that a shot!
×
×
  • Create New...