Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I own a s13 silvia, which is fairly modded in terms of suspension, brakes and all the rest, and I have put a rb20 in it which has a high flowed turbo, front mount and a few other things like after market bov and is running 18pound. I'm at the point where i need to buy a aftermarket comp and im wondering whether i should bother, or build up a decent motor.

THese are my options; I own another rb20 block, 26 crank, rods and would buy a 26 head. I believe that because the bore is the same across the rb range, and only the stroke is different (apart from block differences,more modern as they progress) that I could buy forged rods (decrease the stroke) and dome top pistons (increase the subsequently lowered comp ratio) and get closer to a 2.5/2.6 litre that revs harder than a 26 and of course a 30 (as the 30 is limited by its stroke) and avoid the older tech of the 30 block, and get away from the oiling problems of the early 26's. By going to a twin high mount turbo set up (splitting the exhaust with firing order in mind, same as the 26). By changing the head studs to something stronger, and running a thicker metal gasket, the volume increase, and a subsequent compression loss occurs, allowing ultimately for more boost (due to the lower compression) and the twin turbo's will lend themselves to the lower comp, given that they will kick in earlier (than a large single) and make up for the lower na power prior to boost.

Essentially This first option would be a hybrid 26ish, except substituting the block for a rb20 and making up the for the volume difference in bore, stroke, and piston caps, all things that would be changed in a serious 26 or 30 build.

The second option would be to opt for a tradition 26 head and 30 block (there is something to be said for following a trend, look at the vl turbo's quarter times)

and maybe a third option would be building up a late model 26.

P.s guys i apologize for the dodgy shit, that's been going up the last few days, a mate hacked me and put up all the crap.

Your american arn't you...

better do a little more research mate.

Justin

Na dude, I'm australian, research with regards to what?

Edited by Overnight Parts From Japan

Rb bore sizes are the same for rb25/26/30

rb20's have a smaller bore champ.

Sorry my bad, just checked and your right, do you know if they are able to be bored out to 86?

you might be able to get it out to 82, but to make the 26 head fit (if it is indeed possibl) you would have to use bore sleeves.

I like the idea mate, but being limited to the RB20 head is probably your greatest downside in this project: read: there would be expensive headwork involved in properly taking advantage of the increased output ?

what does everyone else think ?

Dude - search function.

Put "RB24" into it. Watch the joyus results roll in.

There are entire threads listing in detail exactly what parts you need, what needs to be done and so on.

For the price, RB25. RB24 is simply not worth the money as you'll soon see by searching and reading past threads about it. Hence there are very little.

Thanks.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...