Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Where this thought came from is that I have been experimenting with different pully sizes on my open deck engine (which has the N1 water pump). I am also thinking of putting 3 temp sensors in the spacer plate of my next engine to get a picture of what is happening cooling wise around each of the cylinders. (Ala the Jun super lemon R33.. Too much data is just enough).

Im trying to track down some REAL flow data for the RB water pumps. Seems that oil pump data is everyhere to be found, but there is little said about the flow capabilities of the various coolant pumps.

The most that seems to be out there is:

The VL/RB30 pumps are 6 blade and all RB20/25/26 pumps are 8 blade. N1 is 6 blade with an anti-cavitation disc.

Search results have come up with this quote below... about the only moderately *useful* bit of information. Others comments posted claim the N1 pump has higher flow, but do not offer an explanation or any real data other than the belief that N1 = Race car stuff = MORE POWER = MORE COOLING.

I've always seen people in high hp/high rpm applications (Nissan RB26 N1 water pump for example) try to decrease cavitation for better cooling going around a track at the expense of low rpm flow due to the design of the blades.

Also of interest is that the RB20/25/26 pumps are turned at a lower average speed due to the pulley size being larger, compared with the VL/RB30 pumps. Which stands to reason as the skyline engines are designed to rev more. So turning the pump slower will mean less cavitation risk at higher RPM, whilst possibly achiving a lower flow rate.

So the thinking is, that a stock pump/pully configuration will actually be more "streetable" for most applications, as it will provide more flow at lower RPM. Resulting in a more even engine temperature (less variation) from the block to the head.

It also stands to reason the N1 pumps whilst being able to maintain sufficent coolant flow at 9000 rpm on an RB26 configured engine, may also just barely deliver enough coolant flow at low speeds. Which leads me to think the N1 pump is not at all suitable for a big torque stroker engine, as sufficent coolant flow may not be possible when the engine is operating around 1500-2200 rpm. Especially in very hot climates. But on a smaller displacement engine that typically revs around ~3000+ in typical in traffic driving, the N1 is adequite.

There is also the Patrol RB30's to consider. They run a smaller pully size again than the VL's but on the same pump. Granted a big part of the reasoning behind this is to turn the fan faster so the engine will get propper cooling when spinning all 4 weeks and bogged to the axels in mud.

Im interested in hearing everyones thoughts, and if you have actual flow data by all means post it up!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360574-water-pump-flow-rates/
Share on other sites

Honestly i think that wins the longest opening post without pictures.

What is the main reason for working out the flow of the pumps? Have u got a stock and a n1 to compare? Might have a different pitch om the blades

Ok.. a picture... N1 vs stock. And as we all probably know, the RB30/VL pumps resemble a vl pump but without the disc supporting the blades.

n1waterpump.jpg

Flow data is important for a number of reasons.

1. Higher flow reduces hotspots, and temperature differentuals in the engine.

2. Higher flow will pull in cooler water from the radiator more easily and faster into the hot coolant circulating within the engine blocks galeries, of course flow limited and controlled by the thermostat.

3. As a result of 2, higher flow will more quickly result in a stabilised engine temperature when loads change suddenly from light to heavy resulting in more heat.

4. More stable engine temps over varying operating conditions mean that the tune of the engine will not drift as much based on sensor corrections and compensations... so the car will be nicer to drive, run better and make more power more reliably.

Ideally you want as much flow as you can possibly get, without pump cavitation, and without robbing too much power from the engine.

Coolant flow rates should be matched to the operating speed and maximum working speed of the engine. If we were able to see an actual chart of the pump flow rate, pullies could be sized appropriately to achieve maximum flow at engine redline before cavitation sets in, thereby achiving the highest flow possible at low working speeds. I hope that makes more sense.

No flow data here but the reason I put an OEM RB20 pump on my 3L instead of an N1 pump is purely due to the many opinions that they are designed for sustained high rpm's.

The OEM pump? i thought it would have been the other way around, especially for track work

The OEM pump? i thought it would have been the other way around, especially for track work

Sorry, meant the N1 pump is designed for sustained high rpm which is why I opted for the OEM RB20 pump as the 3L was in my daily driver (at the time) so I didn't want any issues when getting stuck in traffic on the way to work.

Also, chuckie had a custom impeller made for his water pump by Terry Stacy, looked like a trick bit of kit, very similar to the N1 setup. No idea on flow rates etc though.

The other thing to consider is, if the coolant is pumped TOO quickly, it will pass through the radiator before it has had a chance to be thoroughly cooled...

Could be the N1 pump is 6-bladed, not 8 to stop the water rushing through the radiator too fast at high RPM/track conditions

Also just to mention, on my RB25, I use cheap RB30 water pumps.

Have come across both 6 & 8 blade...

Would seem the only difference between the cheap ($60 odd) pump & N1 is the anti-cavitation disc (& materials used, etc)

I think with the cheaper pumps the different aftermarket companys that make them vary with the blades. One of the companys my other job deals with do the 8 blade water pumps. Think the brand is Trueflow, it doesnt have the cavitation plate either

I was reading your build thread just the other day which is very impressive by the way :D, and noticed you mentioning something about using the 300zx pulley to speed up the pump. Well i used to own a z32 300zx and when fitting an underdrive crank pulley, it was a good idea to fit an overdrive waterpump pulley to keep the waterpump operating at the correct speed. If your trying to speed up your pump this might be an easy solution.

Clicky

Flow data is important for a number of reasons.

1. Higher flow reduces hotspots, and temperature differentuals in the engine.

2. Higher flow will pull in cooler water from the radiator more easily and faster into the hot coolant circulating within the engine blocks galeries, of course flow limited and controlled by the thermostat.

3. As a result of 2, higher flow will more quickly result in a stabilised engine temperature when loads change suddenly from light to heavy resulting in more heat.

4. More stable engine temps over varying operating conditions mean that the tune of the engine will not drift as much based on sensor corrections and compensations... so the car will be nicer to drive, run better and make more power more reliably.

Ideally you want as much flow as you can possibly get, without pump cavitation, and without robbing too much power from the engine.

Coolant flow rates should be matched to the operating speed and maximum working speed of the engine. If we were able to see an actual chart of the pump flow rate, pullies could be sized appropriately to achieve maximum flow at engine redline before cavitation sets in, thereby achiving the highest flow possible at low working speeds. I hope that makes more sense.

As I understand it you need to consider pressure in the system also, because pressure helps stop steam pockets from forming which lead to hot spots.

You could increase flow rate by removing any restriction/restrictior (such as a thermostat) but this would reduce the pressure and could lead to worse cooling by virtue of steam pockets forming.

Also flow paths and flow split between the head and bottom end should be considered. You might be able to flow 'smarter' ,rather than flow faster, to cool the engine as well or better, and this won't rob HP.

The other thing to consider is, if the coolant is pumped TOO quickly, it will pass through the radiator before it has had a chance to be thoroughly cooled...

Could be the N1 pump is 6-bladed, not 8 to stop the water rushing through the radiator too fast at high RPM/track conditions

Apparently that is 100% not true.

It would probably cool a given unit of water faster because you get more turbulence.

You are flowing more units of water per unit of time so this compensates for a unit of water 'dwelling' in the radiator for less time.

Trying poring boiling water or your hand, first slow and then fast and get back to use about cooling rates! :)

I was reading your build thread just the other day which is very impressive by the way :D, and noticed you mentioning something about using the 300zx pulley to speed up the pump. Well i used to own a z32 300zx and when fitting an underdrive crank pulley, it was a good idea to fit an overdrive waterpump pulley to keep the waterpump operating at the correct speed. If your trying to speed up your pump this might be an easy solution.

Clicky

I have something very similar to this sitting on my loungeroom table at the moment. I'll be fitting it next weekend to see how it goes.

Stock RB26 is a 135mm diameter

RB30 is 115mm (approx... its on the car so hard to measure)

Z32 underdrive is 100mm.

I figure since the N1 pump is used on engines that rev to 10k, and if I only use 8k gearing it up a bit to increase flow whilst gaining the benefits of the anti-cavitation design through mid range and top end RPM is worth a go. I'll re-measure the balancer side on the weekend and workout the exact ratio increase.

Its cooling down now at my end of the country now too. 35+ degree days arent happening anymore, so I might have to wait another 9 months before I can properly start experimenting with this again.

As I understand it you need to consider pressure in the system also, because pressure helps stop steam pockets from forming which lead to hot spots.

You could increase flow rate by removing any restriction/restrictior (such as a thermostat) but this would reduce the pressure and could lead to worse cooling by virtue of steam pockets forming.

Also flow paths and flow split between the head and bottom end should be considered. You might be able to flow 'smarter' ,rather than flow faster, to cool the engine as well or better, and this won't rob HP.

Yes pressure is required to eliminate hot spots and air/steam pockets, but removing restrictions isnt going to help increase flow. The system is closed and pressure of the coolant system has nothing to do with the flow rate of the pump. Its all about thermal expansion of the liquid, and the relief pressure of the radiator cap alone determines system pressure. The only way system pressure could effect flow would be if the coolant viscosity changed with pressure or temperature.

The restrictions after the pump that limit flow are the galleries in the block and the head, however its pretty safe to say that virtually all RB blocks of the same family will flow a simular rate given an identical pressure.

Edited by GTRNUR

Hi,

heres few of my Pump,

post-36964-0-18079000-1302634769_thumb.jpg

post-36964-0-37842500-1302634921_thumb.jpg

Great looking impeller you have there. I guess you had to slot the disc and tig weld the blades both sides of the disc. And then probably machine it round and flat again. Very fiddly work.

Apparently that is 100% not true.

It would probably cool a given unit of water faster because you get more turbulence.

You are flowing more units of water per unit of time so this compensates for a unit of water 'dwelling' in the radiator for less time.

Trying poring boiling water or your hand, first slow and then fast and get back to use about cooling rates! :)

I agree with you there Tony, except for the boiling water test...

Most people with something serious under the bonnet are also already running a tripple core radiator as well and typically have twice the coolant capacity and much more cooling surface area. If you factor in this with the fact you are generally going faster at a higher RPM and your cooling systems efficency goes up exponentially with speed.

Also, chuckie had a custom impeller made for his water pump by Terry Stacy, looked like a trick bit of kit, very similar to the N1 setup. No idea on flow rates etc though.

Hi,

heres few of my Pump,

post-36964-0-18079000-1302634769_thumb.jpg

post-36964-0-37842500-1302634921_thumb.jpg

There ya go :D

I agree with you there Tony, except for the boiling water test...

Most people with something serious under the bonnet are also already running a tripple core radiator as well and typically have twice the coolant capacity and much more cooling surface area. If you factor in this with the fact you are generally going faster at a higher RPM and your cooling systems efficency goes up exponentially with speed.

Well that is my point that fast flow rates don't mean 'the water doesn't get a chance to cool in the radiator'.

My boiling water comment was to demonstrate that heat exchange would still occur at higher flow rates. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey Dave, welcome aboard! Good to see another soon-to-be Stagea owner here. The wagons are awesome — plenty of space, still got that Skyline DNA, and loads of potential if you’re into mods. Definitely post up pics when you get it, everyone here loves seeing new builds. What model/year are you looking at?
    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
×
×
  • Create New...