Jump to content
SAU Community

L28 Block Girdle's


luvemfast
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi guys.

I'm not on here often, mainly into the older Datsun Z's. But thought that some guys here might be interested.

These used to be sold by Neil Cartlidge a decade ago.

With Neil's permission, I have re-modelled these to be made available for sale.

I gauging interest for Block braces / Girdle's to suit an L6.

They are custom made, laser cut from high tensile steel. Very nice bits of gear.

Think of it as cheap insurance for your engine.

For all of those people complaining about leaking rear mains............ Thats due to crank flex.

This also makes the entire block more rigid, increasing durability and performance. Neil swore they moved the harmonic vibration up the rev range.

Street or race spec engines can benefit by the correct fitment of one of these.

The girdles are fastened via many different methods depending on other accessories.

They bolt through the mains using either longer ARP studs or Unbrako socket head cap screws (M10x90mm from memeory). Both methods require spacers approx 10.0-10.5mm (dependant on individual requirements) between the mains and the girdle. Hardened washers must be used for both methods under fasteners.

If using stock sump, you should use the small pilot holes in the girdle as a drill guide to drill and tap M8 into the block webbing. This should be done during a trial fitment of the mains caps, so that everything is in the correct positions. When the girdle is removed, drill the guide holes out to a clearance size and counterbore to suit an Unbrako countersunk screw.

If using an Arizona Z Car aluminium sump, use Unbrako socket head cap screws to fasten through original sump holes.

Threebond can be used between the layers to seal them.

I think that pretty much covers it.

$180

+ delivery (1 was sent to Queensland & Tassie, registered for $20. UK sea mail for $70)

post-21948-0-38129800-1303085243_thumb.jpg

post-21948-0-02950900-1303085269_thumb.jpg

post-21948-0-06365600-1303085415_thumb.jpg

post-21948-0-68704200-1303085429_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will they work with a front sump arrangement as Zeds are rear configuration?

Hmmmm, that is a very good point. One that I didn't think about as I only have rear sump blocks......... Are they any different? or is it the pickups that change?

Soooo......

It will fit. But if the pick up is in a different location, it will be missing the 3 holes needed.

Is the dipstick hole in the same place too?

If someone can supply me the dimensions, I can add them to the CAD file.

Edited by luvemfast
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...