Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I have decided to change my suspention over from a JIC coilover kit to a Bilstein and spring combo . My only problem is what springs to use - Eibach or Kings . The spring rates are about the same the only BIG differnace is that the Kings are liner at the front and progressive at the rear . The Eibach springs are liner all round . I like the concpet of the progressive springs for ride comfort but at the same time a little uneasy by the induced body roll of the top soft springs until enough pressure is put on the spring and the hard spring is hit . Going into a corner you never know what your going to get - the soft or the hard . also the car is Street only

would love hear of peoples view or experiences with either of the two springs

thanks

Edited by buzzboy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/361719-eibach-vs-king-springs/
Share on other sites

if its a street only car then honestly your not going to notice any difference between the eibach's or kings.

Most people dont tune suspension with progressive rate springs properly which is why they are unpredictable.

If you select the spring and shock properly when the car enters the corner and weight is put into the spring the progressive section of the spring should be compressed and using the higher rate.

If you have the wrong spring you will end up 3/4 (just an example) into the lower rates travel at entry and reaching the higher rate at midcorner (if you have the grip) then coming back to the lower rate at the exit. This does become unpredicatable.

Saying that if you are pushing hard enough on the street to worry about what the spring is going to do entering a corner you should be on the circuit instead.....

Nothing worng with a progressive rate spring, I dont persoanlly like using them for anything other than a comfortable road car though, they have many adavantages and disadvantages which are far behond a road car, they do however have a valid place in road cars for ride comfort.

If it matters id take eibachs or QA1 springs over kings any and every day.

the king springs are only progressive to keep the springs captive

I had a set of king springs before, with the weight of the car, the progressive section of the spring should close up, like helper springs, therefore the effective rate is still the higher rate

  • 3 weeks later...

Ive got Bilsteins with Kings and they are perfect. You cant feel any transition between soft and hard as you explained so dont worry about that haha.

The only difference is that the car is nice and smooth when daily and then handles real nicely once pushed through corners.

Go the kings if daily and they perfectly fine to be used on track too

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...