Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Im having a problem where my boost keeps increasing with rpm which i originally thaught was due to my boost controller but now dont know what it is.

As i accelerate boost comes on at 2800rpm (7psi) and manages to hold till about 4000 where after this it just slowly increase till i have a max 10+psi at 7000 rpm. its like the wastegate just cant waste enough is this possible on std turbo(the factory solinoid has been removed and i just have a hose going from plenum to w/g actuator).

My mods are 3in turb back exaust, hks type s cooler, adjust cam gear, 910 fuel pump.

Origially the exaust was restricting the movment of the w/g but i ground it out today and it now seem to have full travel ie, arm is parallel with the front to back of car. but the problem still there. i have driven the car with the actuator off and w/g lockwired fully open and it still manages to make 10psi by 7000 (this was before i grinded the exaust but seeing as ive still got the prob ide say it would still do it now)

im wondering weather the std actuator has enough travelin it i pulled it out and had a play it seems to work smooth with no leaks.

anyone got any ideas as im all out?????????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36236-boost-just-keeps-increasing/
Share on other sites

if it is the standard actuator, it should be fine to move the standard???? wastegate

therefore i doubt it would be that unless its faulty, try and push 7psi through it with a compressor or something, and see if it pops open

try maybe 10psi if 7psi works

then maybe try something higher

Just a thought, but could it be possible that someone previously had an external waste gate/dump pipe fitted, welding up the hole one the current outlet (waste-gate outlet) from the turbo? They may have removed it along with the dump pipe when they sold the car. It would be strange if this was the case but it is something I have seen once before. Anyway, just thought. :(

I have a funny feeling you're looking at it the wrong way... I don't think the wastegate isn't dumping enough exhaust gas to hold your boost, I reckon the wastegate isn't completely shutting, making the boost you *should* be getting come on much slower. This fits in with the descriptions you have given.

It's extremely unlikely that, with a stock turbo and only a fuel pump/cooler/cam gear, the wastegate would become restrictive.

thanks for all your imput guys but every thing im tryn just doesnt seem to work. and i dont understand how if i disconect my actuator from the w/g (the machanical linkage) and tie off the w/g in the fully open position and go 4 a drive i can still get 10psi+ by redline.

revhead, if what ur sayin is the case what can i do to fix it.

My apologies, I totally mis-read the opening thread.

My understanding is, and im open for corrections here, is that if you have the hose connected directly from the plenum to the waste gate actuator you will have trouble coming on boost. This is because the factory hose has a tiny restrictor in it which stops the actuator opening up in direct relevance to the pressure in the plenum. If that hose was disconnected it would not actuate and bring the boost up in a steeper curve, but be careful because it will over boost (ka-boom). I'm assuming that the complaint is that the boost is not hitting 10psi @ lower revs.

To check it, unbolt the actuator from its mounts and see if you can pull the gate further closed. If it won't go any further, pull the dump pipe off (yes, pain in the butt) and make sure the gate actually seals properly, and that nothing stops its movement.

If that does help, you can either bend or shorten the actuator bar, modify the bracket on the actuator to mount it slightly further from the rear of the turbo, or look at some other method of making the gate shut properly at standstill.

runing a hose straighti from plenum to actulator is going to give you your minimum

machanical boost. The wast gate will open as soon as it reaches 7psi which is around the standard spring rate. having a 3'' exhaust will flow alot better than stock which will increase boost and excessively more in the top end which is what you are seeing. i ran 10psi minimum then when removing the cat could not run less than 13psi.

I dont think there is anything wrong, i would sudjest a restrictor or bleed valve to bring boost on strong to 10psi for more stable boost control.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...