Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys just a quick question I just acquired an Apexi SAFC, now I know this unit is not as good as a nistune or a PFC but it was given to me buy a mate so it was free. My car is fairly stock , it has a front mount cooler, 3.5 inch turbo back exhaust, walbro fuel pump, HKS Pod and a turbo smart boost controller. My car will stay like this for quite some time so I dont see the need in getting a nistune or Power FC at the moment. Im about to start looking for someone that can tune this for me but first i have a couple of question for you guys.

1. My car hits fuel cut sometimes as my boost is set at 12 PSI, Can the SAFC eliminate this problem?

2. For a car as stock as mine does it realy need a tune? or am I wasting my coin

3. I have been told that i should get better fuel economy from my car after a tune do you agree? (I dont care if the car gets better fuel economy or not, if i did care i would of brought another car)

4. If you have an SAFC who did you get to tune it

Any help or extra input would be great guys thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/
Share on other sites

1. My car hits fuel cut sometimes as my boost is set at 12 PSI, Can the SAFC eliminate this problem?

2. For a car as stock as mine does it realy need a tune? or am I wasting my coin

3. I have been told that i should get better fuel economy from my car after a tune do you agree? (I dont care if the car gets better fuel economy or not, if i did care i would of brought another car)

4. If you have an SAFC who did you get to tune it

My car has similar mods to yours & this is from my experience:

1) Most likely, I'm runing 10PSI through my bleed valve with a SAFC 2 & I've no R&R problem when I go WOT at over 6k rpm

2) If you have R&R (& you saying you have) it is worth a shot trying to fix it with SAFC, other opinion is to lower boost & see if it fixes the R&R.

3) Most likely won't be noticable (I didn't notice much).

4) I got mine tuned at All Star Garage (a import shop in WA), SAFC is a pretty basic signal bender unit & hence any 1/2 decent shop should have no problem.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5787116
Share on other sites

If you're not planning any mods SAFC will be better than nothing ( I had one once). Should fix your R&R but get it tuned on a dyno just to satisfy yourself that everything is safe (shouldn't cost too much). And you are unlikely to get better economy - if it goes better you will go faster!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5787497
Share on other sites

Get a wideband with a serial output that you can map onto your PC, let your tuning adventures begin :)

AEM UEGO is a good neat unit you could get for cheap or Innovate LC-1 Gauge Kit since the USD vs AUD is fantastic!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5788312
Share on other sites

Get a wideband with a serial output that you can map onto your PC, let your tuning adventures begin :)

AEM UEGO is a good neat unit you could get for cheap or Innovate LC-1 Gauge Kit since the USD vs AUD is fantastic!

Hey johnnilicte are you sugesting to give it a go myself? Tuning is one job i always thought should be left to the pros?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5788403
Share on other sites

Hey johnnilicte are you sugesting to give it a go myself? Tuning is one job i always thought should be left to the pros?

that's a myth, I've street tuned my friend's EVO 8, CA18DET Pulsar ET and my previous R33 none of them kapow'ed yet and still going strong.

It's about knowing what to do, doesn't necessarily mean you need a pro. When I didn't know anything about tuning, I paid a tuner to tune my car. He made a dog's breakfast out of my tune. I had WOT A/Fs at 12.7:1 with about 14 degrees of timing dialed into row 15 and even more timing dialed into rows 16. Nevertheless, it was then I went "fk this" I'm going to learn how to do it myself.

He didn't even touch my Injector latency settings or anything either, he said "I always leave them at 100%"... I took his word for it.

Just start reading up, but a SAFC is a great way to learn, as it only deals with the A/F.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5788936
Share on other sites

whilist i agree just be careful with the SAFC and understand what it is doing and how it affects the ECU

be sure to note it BENDS the AFM signal to the std computer and it uses this way to make the car rich/lean and more/less timing

so if you can get your head around that (not hard) then its easy

the computer looks at the airflow meter signal and throttle body sensor to work out how hard the engine is working

based off "how hard" the engine is working it then computes ignition timing and air/fuel injection control (ie what ratio to aim for)

the SAFC sits between your airflow meter and the std computer to "BEND" or "Fake" the signal

the the SAFC will say the engine is under less load that it really is, which in turn makes the computer throw in less fuel and/or more timing

so you get a leaner ratio (more power) but you also get more timing (not always good). so its juggling act, balancing both.

on a system like a powerfc or nistune you can edit both maps seperately - the ignition and fuel injection maps

and say whatever XYZ degrees at XYZ RPM and XYZ AF/R at XYZ rpm etc etc

on the SAFC you simply say bend + or - XXX increments from 2800rpm to 3200rpm

so say -2 at 2800rpm to 3200rpm

then -4 at 3200rpm to 3600rpm

so you basically juggle the beinding to get the best comprimise

back in the day, everyone had SAFC'S and got good reuslts and not many hand standalones

a lot has changed since then and most just go straight for stand alone ECUS like nistune or powerfc

but the SAFC is cheap, easy to setup yourself and away you go, good results for fraction of the price (just remember the comprimise/juggle operability)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5788991
Share on other sites

thanks for the input guys, I have never given tuning a thought but maybe ill have a look around on the net and do some reading and see what i can learn. Mayuri Krab I know the tuning for an safc is very cheap the most i got quoted was 250 but at the moment no one has touched my car everything that has been done to it has been done buy me or mates and in our garages id like to keep it that way at least i can say i built this (or blew it up) and not that i payed for this!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362617-safc-tuning/#findComment-5789558
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...