Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Of prime importance is having no preload when you set them up. Find a level area to ensure equal height of each axle.

There should be an adjustment on the drop link to set up each corner. I have never installed a kit from scratch, only adjusted them once installed. from what I've seen they are a pretty easy install.

Hi B1, the best way to do them is on ramps. That way, when you tighten up the bolts on the link bushes, they are not going to twist when you lower the car down to normal height. If you don't have ramps, then you can jack it up. Just don't tighten the links bushes excessively and make sure you grease the side surfaces of the link bushes. They have nylock nuts so they won't come loose. Only use the supplied grease, as it is guaranteed not to affect the polyurethane that the bushes are made of. The most import greasing points are the large pivot bushes that the bars rotate in.

Hope that helps

thanks sydkid. ok heres what ive learnt sofar.

1. the car should idealy be sitting on an even surface (hoist or ramps) so theres no preload on the bars.

thats about it...haha

another question.....when i decide to lower my car, b/c the car sits lower and im sure some camber and stuff have changed....does this affect the swaybars?? as in would i need to re-install them after lowering it so its set to the new ride height??

cheers guys

another question.....when i decide to lower my car, b/c the car sits lower and im sure some camber and stuff have changed....does this affect the swaybars?? as in would i need to re-install them after lowering it so its set to the new ride height??

cheers guys

Hi B1, not enough change to worry about.

Hi NRB, if the bushes were not lubricated enough then they would stays twisted and wear out a bit quicker.

It's not a major issue, but if you can avoid it, then do. If it's too hard, don't stress over it.

  • 2 weeks later...

hey guys.......they finally arived yesterday. im abit stumped as to where everything goes. ive attached a pic of what i think how the rear swaybar should be assembled. am i right? are the washers in the right place? is everything in the right direction?? where do i have to grease??

the front ones just came with 2 urethane bushy things to replace the old ones. thats normal isnt it?

feel free to draw on the pic and repost it up:D:D

anyone??

well had a go at takin the front stock one off yesterday. was able to take one nut off the bracket that holds the bush but couldnt reach the other one that sits above and behind the radial bush/rod thingy. looked like i had to unbolt the that to get to the bracket nut. is there any other way to do this?? looks like i might have to take it to a mech afterall:(

hey guys.......they finally arived yesterday.  im abit stumped as to where everything goes.  ive attached a pic of what i think how the rear swaybar should be assembled.  am i right?  are the washers in the right place?  is everything in the right direction??  where do i have to grease??

the front ones just came with 2 urethane bushy things to replace the old ones.  thats normal isnt it?

feel free to draw on the pic and repost it up:D:D

Pretty much spot on, the large washer goes under the bolt head, on the outside of the bush (not between the bush and the bar). Grease goes on;

*between the bush and the bar

*around the bush in the eye link

*on the ends of the cotton real bushes where they go under and over the lower control arm

thanks sydkid. i ended up just gettin a workshop to put em on....now i think i regret it. i think they put the rear one on wrong. ive attatched a pic. it was done on a hoist. looks like they over tightened the nut up top and when they lowered it its twisted. also is the sway bar meant to sit on the inside or outside of the bush cause it also looks twisted.

love the way the car feels now...i could feel that it was alot stiffer pullin out of the workshop. cant wait for the next suspension mod.:):D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...