Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Damn thats a bummer, you know Id fully help you search for TK parts if you went on the path to get it back to original...

the world is full of huge power skylines, but not many original TKs with all performance mods done...

you wont be able to call it a TK anymore, pull that decal and badge off...

Damn thats a bummer, you know Id fully help you search for TK parts if you went on the path to get it back to original...

the world is full of huge power skylines, but not many original TKs with all performance mods done...

you wont be able to call it a TK anymore, pull that decal and badge off...

I see what you're doing.

*thumbs*

I see what you're doing.

*thumbs*

LOL so do I.. Its got me thinking. But I can't leave that ugly gay cross over pipe, small turbo and intercooler. Just can't.

I just want it to put the wrath of god into me and anyone in the car when it comes on boost. That feeling of your eyeballs being sucked to the back of your head while being pinned.

I want it to make me scream fast n furious when I change gears 8 times lol..

Im glad we got that sorted.

Now please continue with your story of upgrades to your series 1 r33 (with mish mash of left over parts from what could of been a unique r33 but isnt since its missing most of, and will be missing a heap more in the future of, its 'rare' and 'unique' parts, which could of been called a tommy kaira but is now sadly just a wanka-thon to make it sound so much better than every other r33 series 1) that a heap of people on these forums have already been there and done that to their own...

I am honestly still keen to hear what you want to do and reading it happen and seeing the awesome pics of the process, and Im sure it will be nicely done and and done your way, and there is nothing wrong with that...

but please come down to earth, your doing what alot of people have done before its not rare, unique or different, its another build process, and yes it may be great even the one done perhaps the best, but I reckon alot of people have started just like your starting now, with a very similar car.

I reckon do a build thread too, with heaps of pictures, I love seeing pictures of decent builds, and I love shiny parts and loud obnxious cars that scare when driven...

btw most people say the series 2 looks better, just sayin...

Found this that for some reason didnt upload with the others.

297050_10150804865265597_755005596_20630741_7871354_n.jpg

The build itself is not rare unique and different, but the car itself is. Thats what im saying. If it wasnt the car that it is, I wouldnt have a skyline or have grown to like them. The car is what it is whichever way you look at it, and thats a TK, reguardless of the larger bolt on parts.

As I said when I have more parts, more pics and theres a fair amount of progress happening with the car I'll start a build thread.

Exactly, no reason to keep matching numbers when every other original bit is gone too.

and back to my previous statement, its a series 1 with a bodykit, an ugly one at that.

u can continue build process of your series 1 now...

75coupe, just as I started to think you were somewhat decent, I won’t insult your intelligence by suggesting that you really believe what you just said but thank you, I'm challenged by your "unique" point of view. You have an open mind and a mouth to match.

As for Rolls, don't let your mind wander, its far too little to be let out on its own. Thinking really isn't your strong point, is it? Why don't you freeze your teeth and give your tongue a sleigh ride.

Theres only so many times you can go around in circles and go over the same thing.

Now that your both finished having delusions of competence, feel free to not comment in this thread and let me enjoy and build my ugly series 1.

So may I have the pleasure of you both absence?

Thanks.

Correct me if im wrong, but with a stroker, because the rod/piston's dont actually have to travel as far, then there is less force/momentum being created.. Therefore you can actually rev higher.

pistons travel further in a stroker, hence longer stroke.. from bottom to top dead centre

Are the rods not shorter in a stroker engine?

Nevermind me, just did some reading up on the subject. Funny, I never really put much thought towards how crank throw affects displacement. Oops :D

OP, hows the car coming along? Did you settle on turbo choice yet?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...