Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes agreed there are tons of factors involved, hence I say all things equal in the vehicles.

But given the ridiculous number of variables, I'd gauge it by the best of what people have actually achieved with each setup, for that is the only real determinant we have. It's not perfect, but real world results are what matters. It's no good saying AWD has better potential than RWD down the strip if we haven't been able to prove it yet. Until that happens it's just theory. One of the largely unacknowledged factors, for example, is that drag racing has always been a traditionally RWD motorsport...so with many more teams focusing on development for RWD applications, this will obviously effect what is being done for AWD in terms of improvement down the quarter.

Ridiculous but applicable hypothetical: if someone said to me and another person, make the fastest drag car you possibly can, winner gets a million bucks....my drivetrain choice would go RWD, FWD and AWD.

Most drag races happen at the traffic lights anyway...with cars that usually do anything from 12-17 second quarter miles...in which case...all wheel drive is pretty easy to get it going consistently quick.

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes agreed there are tons of factors involved, hence I say all things equal in the vehicles.

But given the ridiculous number of variables, I'd gauge it by the best of what people have actually achieved with each setup, for that is the only real determinant we have. It's not perfect, but real world results are what matters. It's no good saying AWD has better potential than RWD down the strip if we haven't been able to prove it yet. Until that happens it's just theory. One of the largely unacknowledged factors, for example, is that drag racing has always been a traditionally RWD motorsport...so with many more teams focusing on development for RWD applications, this will obviously effect what is being done for AWD in terms of improvement down the quarter.

Ridiculous but applicable hypothetical: if someone said to me and another person, make the fastest drag car you possibly can, winner gets a million bucks....my drivetrain choice would go RWD, FWD and AWD.

Most drag races happen at the traffic lights anyway...with cars that usually do anything from 12-17 second quarter miles...in which case...all wheel drive is pretty easy to get it going consistently quick.

AWD has it's advantages when your in a traction limited environment although I'm not just talking when its wet or your driving on gravel etc.

talking street redialed tyres on pretty much any car I would prefer AWD, with the benefits of each platform increasing with the level of power output your talking about.

I'll leave the rest of the discussion in the other thread for now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
    • And if you have to drill the oil block, then just drill it for 1/4" and tap it BSP and get a 1/8 to 1/4 BSP bush. The Nissan sender will go straight in and the bush will suit the newly tapped hole. And it will be real strong, to boot.
    • No it doesn't. It just needs an ezy-out to pull that broken bit of alloy out of the hole and presto chango - it will be back to being a 1/8" hole tapped NPT. as per @MBS206 recco. That would be for making what you had in alloy, in steel. If you wanted to do just that instead of remote mounting like @Duncan and I have been pushing. A steel fitting would be unbreakable (compared to that tragically skinny little alloy adapter). But remote mounting would almost certainly be 10x better. Small engineering shops abound all over the place. A lathe and 10 minutes of time = 2x six packs.
×
×
  • Create New...