Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

wow was this event amazing or what!!! the D1 guys were off tha chain!!! I'm glad i was able to stay here long enough to catch this event. and thaks to hpi, fulllock for making this happen. btw here r some pics from the event and hopefully some vids if i have time..

http://drift411.com/modules.php?op=modload...order=0&thold=0

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36733-hpi-drift-nationals/
Share on other sites

LOL i had a ball. thought it was great, then the Japs came out and RAPED the aussie cars!!!! ( ***N AWESOME) Sat down on the grass and later SAU sat to my left, 2 shy to say HI 2 peeps but asked MR GOLGO a question but 4got what, then later giggled my ass off when u fellas caught that little bastard tryin to take the SAU banner off the ....fence?

It was a great day, good to see so much SAu representation.

There were blue shirts everywhere! :)

It was also nice to see some decent 'old school' representation, with the likes of BOWSER, ONTRYL, a red silhouette, and a really nice DR30.

Here are a few of my pics.

~K

Was a great, made even better when i got in for free, thanks to my mate's Calder Offical pass :). His car was the XA coupe parked inside near the Calder Park office.

Was great to meet all the usual people and to see all the blue T-shirts.

Can't wait till the next Drift Practice day :).

Those are the "Thunder Cops"

They provided a bit of entertainment.

I first saw them at last years EasterNats and was blown away by their performance.

I can't imagine the skill involved in keeping a car up on 2 wheels like that.

Damn.. I barely have enough balance to walk upright!

They drove around a whole section of the track on 2 wheels, and the chick passenger gets out of the car and stands up straddling the window with her arms in the air.

I have a few more angles of the car........

I'm agreeing with everyone here, it was an awesome day and anyone that didn't go, or left early missed out on a hell of a lot.

Those Jap D1 drives need to do some classes for the aussie drivers or something because there weren't any other cars that were anywhere near as good.

All the drift pics look great people (just need more of the dancing girl that couldn't keep her top up).

As soon as a date is set for the drift nats, i'll be booked in again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...