Jump to content
SAU Community

  

110 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

So the question is, what is the best handling nissan out of the above and why? Note I am talking about the RWD GT-T versions of the skyline.

At a complete guess I would have thought the S15 would have been the best due to being the newest and lighter than the R34 but I have nothing to back this up with apart from weight, what do you guys think? If you can back it up with some reasoning that would be tops. I'm ignoring power as a metric as they can all be easily modded to 500hp if needed.

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have driven them all other than the S14.

Assuming we are talking about handling on a basic street setup not a full blown track car.

From them I think the best overall handling from a street perspective is the S15 aswell. While possibly the S13 might actually handle better on a track from being a bit lighter, I find that the S15 feels more solid/less clunky/smoother and gives a better overall feal which is important on a stret driven car. The steering also seems to feel a bit quicker than in the Skylines (not sure, might not be but feels like it).

However the best handling overall Nissan I have driven is a 370Z. Now just gotta get some one to give me the keys to a R35 :P

EDIT: Also since it is kind of part of the family and should be mentioned. The 300ZX was the worst handling Nissan import I have driven. The steering is horrible in it and requires huge amounts of lock to turn.

the S series cars should be the better handling cars due to them being the more sports car oriented range. the skylines are basically a sporty family car. i owned a 180sx and a r33 and i'd have to say that the s13 had a sharper feel to it. the r33 had a better ride thanks to plusher suspension. for an everyday comparison though, there isn't too much between them, and if built into a track car i think there would be even less.

Ive only driven an R32 R33 S13 and S14

The R33 was the worst out of them

And I think the S14 is the best the S15 should be pretty much the same maybe a little better as they are very similar chassis

Everything I've been told is that the skyline can carve the twisties, albeit not as well as some, but definitely capably.

I drive a stock standard AU falcon (read; cumbersome boat), and my next car will be a lowered 34, how much better can I expect the handling to be?

If you had stock suspension in the AU it will be amazing difference.

If both were set up with appropriate aussie road springs (4-5kg max), sway bars, appropriate shocks then the R34 will be better, but not amazingly so.

the difference will be noticable...... whether it is in a good or bad way will depend on what suspension it has been lowered with. it will handle better in most cases, but if you put in too stiff suspension then the first time you try to corner hard on a rough rough then you will find that you end up bouncing onto the wrong side of the road. i had this happen in my 180sx when i got new front suspension put in, and i was driving normally. that suspension only stayed in there for 2 days.

You're kidding me? A set of whitelines and some springs can have an AU handle ALMOST as well as a 34 set up for the street?

he is right. the stock suspension is designed for the generally shit aussie roads, so they are pretty soft. make a few changes and it will be a drastically different beast. there will still be a bit of a difference in feel through the steering wheel though because of the different steering wheel size as well as different steering ratio.

Excessive lowering will be detrimental to the handling of your 34 as they are double wishbone.

S series chassis are McPherson strut and I would not call them good handling cars by any stretch of the imagination.

You're kidding me? A set of whitelines and some springs can have an AU handle ALMOST as well as a 34 set up for the street?

Why not? They both are double wishbone front and fully independent rear ends and weigh similar amounts (1400 vs 1437kg). If you are setting the springs, shocks, sway bars, caster etc all up correctly, they would have the capability to be very fast on the track (provided they have the power).

What else does the R34 have that magically makes it a better platform?

Edited by Rolls

the difference will be noticable...... whether it is in a good or bad way will depend on what suspension it has been lowered with. it will handle better in most cases, but if you put in too stiff suspension then the first time you try to corner hard on a rough rough then you will find that you end up bouncing onto the wrong side of the road. i had this happen in my 180sx when i got new front suspension put in, and i was driving normally. that suspension only stayed in there for 2 days.

Yeah I'm thinking of just king springs in the line, as long as the shocks are in good condition. I don't want something too stiff (I want it to be my daily and have the falcon for emergencies).

Are there plenty of swaybar options out there for 34's?

Why not? They both are double wishbone front and fully independent rear ends and weigh similar amounts (1400 vs 1437kg). If you are setting the springs, shocks, sway bars, caster etc all up correctly, they would have the capability to be very fast on the track (provided they have the power).

What else does the R34 have that magically makes it a better platform?

Nothing really, I was labouring under the illusion the skyline was just "better".

Dont go kingsprings, get whiteline and bilstein shocks or something else decent like that. Or tein super streets are about the only coilovers that have reasonable spring rates for our roads.

Yeah it is funny how people just assume because it is a skyline it will be better, and say because it is a commodore or falcon it is a boat, there isn't that much difference once you start modding things.

Edited by Rolls

Dont go kingsprings, get whiteline and bilstein shocks or something else decent like that. Or tein super streets are about the only coilovers that have reasonable spring rates for our roads.

Yeah it is funny how people just assume because it is a skyline it will be better, and say because it is a commodore or falcon it is a boat, there isn't that much difference once you start modding things.

Thanks for the info mate, I'll definitely look into coil overs. I always wanted to, but was told that they'd probably be too stiff for regular street driving. I wasn't aware there was a coil over that was designed for the road.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
×
×
  • Create New...