Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There has been a couple of discussions about this topic but in the end I think it was decided that it was personal preference. Some people said that they heard that the HKS metal was softer or some thing but no one has had any problems with any gears purchased by any of the tuning houses. Personally I have a Trust Cam gear and haven't had a problem with that at all.

Also, you don't want to get the IN gear for your car as you will lose the NVCS which is not something you want. Most R33 GTSt drivers only get the EX wheel.

Cheers!

13_devil I had heard the same (HKS "wears out") so just to make sure I bought a Trust Ex Cam Gear from Nengun.com for about 13,000yen (au ~$155) and recieved it 4 days later.

The HKS was priced at about 12,000yen (~ au$145). You can choose from about 4 brands for a difference of around $20 from cheapest to most expensive so its pretty much personal preference.

Fitting/tuning will cost you almost as much as purchasing the cam gear :)

i dont want to start a new thread about this, but are the results worthwhile?

Say if i get one from nengun for 150 odd then spend whatever getting it fitted and tuned, did people do before and after dyno runs?

What about driving it on the road, could you feel a difference? im just trying to work out if its worth spending the 300 odd getting it done.

i dont want to start a new thread about this, but are the results worthwhile?

Say if i get one from nengun for 150 odd then spend whatever getting it fitted and tuned, did people do before and after dyno runs?

What about driving it on the road, could you feel a difference? im just trying to work out if its worth spending the 300 odd getting it done.

I haven't done it myself yet (Cam Gear is sitting at home still) but from everything I have read and workshops that I have spoken to a Cam Gear will give you 10-15rwkw for only $300.

A Pod filter costs ~$200 and might be lucky to give you 3-5rwkw

A full exhaust costs ~$1500-2000 and might give you 15-20rwkw

A FMIC costs ~$1500 and might give you 15-20rwkw

I'd personally say it would be 1 of the cheapest mods available. I'll do a before/after dyno printout when I get mine installed.

I found it worth while, and I just wacked it in and set it a 3 degrees (no tuning).

For me there was a noticeable increase in mid range power. I'd say around the 10rwkw mark (not MASSIVE but noticable).

For the cost I was very happy, but like Jimbo has said, there are a few people that found 0 degrees was the best :D

Think of it this way, buy the cam gear and wack it in yourself if you can, if there's no improvement, then put it up for sale here on SAU for what you bought it for - it'll get snapped up pretty quick :)

J

If knew how to work out all that 'timing' stuff i'd do it myself and save the $160 on installation/tuning.

What happens if you put it on 2 instead of say 3? Will it be better than stock but not as good as what it would be if it was on 3 or is it only better on 1 setting and worse on all the rest ?

Guest Robo's

MJ

Simutino's HRZ 11 255/40/17

Benm

Yes, 2 degrees retard would be better than the factory setting, -3 or -4 is ideal but any retarded degrees would be better than the factory setting of zero. I initially put my cam degree wheel in positive as the cam gear didnt have any markings on it. It was so slow. We then had too even line up the negative 4 degrees with the eye, but we got it pretty spot on

i have them in my line but they havent been tuned how do you tune them

For a R32 GTR you should have 2 on (inlet and exh).

A good start for a RB26 is 4 degrees retard on the exhaust, and 1 degree advanced on the inlet. It may not be the best, but it's a good start and should be better than stock.

J

not necessarily. You could get Tomei Poncams which are obviously aftermarket but can be installed and still retain your NVCS and use your stock IN gear. But on the whole, yes, you wouldn't bother with the IN side unless you're willing to loose NVCS and put in bigger aftermarket camshafts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...