Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I've got a '95 R33 GTS-4 currently at the workshop having new motor from Series 1 Stagea put in, however the stagea motor was from an automatic...

Talking to the mechanics there are a few plugs missing from the stagea loom compared to my GTS4 one for ABS, Wipers etc...

Does anyone know if I'd be able to run a engine loom from a manual R33 Series 2 GTST??

Cheers

Dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368836-gts4-turbo-conversion/
Share on other sites

Yes S1 stagea has what you would call series 2 RB25DET so coils at least will be different. You will need to upgrade the ecu as you suggested - I don't think you will need to change the loom but if you get the loom, with it you may as well.

But don't use the Stagea loom and ecu - it is an oddball 3 row ecu and you will have problems if you want an aftermarket one later.

Thanks for all the info guys, I'm be putting in aftermarket computer to run it;

What are peoples recommendations I won't be going for big numbers, so would you recommend just a Nistune or Power FC...I've read a few threads saying not to get Greddy Emanage.

I'm just looking for budget at the moment as I just got back from an expensive holiday can always upgrade later.

Cheers :)

Tuner's choice man, there are are few threads on these forums with Nistune vs. PFC, I'd probably go PFC for R33 since they're quite cheap these days; most tuners are happy with them and they are the easiest to install without losing vct or modifying loom for Z32.

I have a Nistune on my R34, they will both make the same power at the end of the day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...