Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

alright, i did a quick search but couldn't find anything that had a solution to this problem

basically i did the check of the attessa system and it gave me fault code 21

this is noted as throttle sensor/circuit. now me being me, i'm not up to scratch with electrical systems

so i was wondering whats the fix for this problem?

whilst on my search i did come across something that claimed autronic systems can cause this problem but still no solution

any 2 cents is appreciated

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/370766-attessa-fault-code-21-tps/
Share on other sites

Grab a multimeter and check the resistance of the TPS at closed and at WOT. Should be 0.4v and 5V I think. If that checks out, then you need a wiring diagram and check the same but measured from the appropriate pins on the ECU plug. I'd do that with the ECU disconnected from the plug if I were you, just in case you find a way to fry the ECU with the multimeter! If you get a different result at the ECU end of the wires, then you have to find out why (ie, broken wire, or corrosion causing high resistance at a loom plug, etc).

Grab a multimeter and check the resistance of the TPS at closed and at WOT. Should be 0.4v and 5V I think. If that checks out, then you need a wiring diagram and check the same but measured from the appropriate pins on the ECU plug. I'd do that with the ECU disconnected from the plug if I were you, just in case you find a way to fry the ECU with the multimeter! If you get a different result at the ECU end of the wires, then you have to find out why (ie, broken wire, or corrosion causing high resistance at a loom plug, etc).

got the multimeter but not sure on where to put the probes ahah,

any help? new to skylines hey :S

have a power fc? sometimes they loose the throttle output to the attessa. first up check the tps voltage at idle. 0.4 is the norm.

nah autronic cdi, guessing itll be same type of problem,

is my plan to test this voltage but what point am i putting the multimeter probe?

you def need to bridge the tps signal wire to the attessa tps signal wire. (just join the 2 together)

cheers, when i work out where these two are, ill get to doing this, diagram i got from the workshop manual is a bit tricky/too blurry to figure out ahah

  • 12 years later...

If anyone else has this issue, check your alternator output. 
 

My car is used infrequently, so I trickle charge my car when it’s laid up. 

I had recently upgraded the radiator including a new electric thermo fan. 

The 4WD Light would come on after driving for a while, usually if it had got hot enough to activate the new thermo fan or if the A\C cut in. My alternator output was only 12.7v under load, so I have deduced that the battery was slowly discharging while driving and any sudden electrical load was enough of a voltage fluctuation to trigger the ATTESSA computer into thinking there was a fault. (Code 21)

Most people will find that they have added extra electrical load with upgrades/modifications over time which the original electrical system wasn’t designed for. 

I have upgraded to a ARD 150A Alternator from RHD Japan.

 https://www.rhdjapan.com/ard-low-resistance-high-output-alternator-z31-r31-r32-r33-r34-c34-c35-wc34.html

Problem solved. 

These are almost a straight fit, only modification is a larger electrical Lug is supplied and needs to be fitted to your wiring loom for the output side of the alternator. 

Cheers 

 

IMG_8671.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...