Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well, besides looks, not a whole heap. Its all about the size of the contact patch at the end of the day (in performance terms) and if you have the same width wheels in 17" and 18", there is not going to be any noticeable difference.

One thing to keep in mind though is that wider tires are generally easier to get for larger sized wheels, although tires for said wheels are usually much more expensive (for the decent stuff anyway).

LW.

I have 18"s now but would love to go back to 17"s. The ride is noticibly different and you can feel that extra inch of sidewall that goes missing.

Tires also are harder to find and a lot more expensive in 18"s. 17"s are also cheaper initially to buy.

I'm running 17x8's on my 200sx atm, last week i temporily put 18x7.5 on to see the difference. I honestly couldn't believe how bumpy it was with the 18's (i've got koni adjustables set on full firm) Car felt like it was skipping over every minor imperfection in the road.

I guess 18's would look more flashy, but when i see a import with expensive 17's i usually get the hint that it means business!

If you want quicker launches, and better fuel efficiency, go the 17"s, as the 18's will have a higher moment of inertia and take more power to get up to the same speed. this also works with 16"s vs 17"s and so on. it all depends on what you want to do, go fast or look good.

18x7.5 seem pretty skinny, i would think if you were after wheels that performed well as well as looked good, you would probably go for 8 or 9 inch wide wheels, especially for the rear.

I think a car with fat 17x9s looks a lot tougher than a car with 18x7.5. Plus tyres are heaps cheaper.

The only car I had that I ever changed rim diameter was my Aus spec R31. Went from 14 to 15 inch.

I didnt think it would make that much difference but hell was I wrong. The ride is a lot more harsh and would assume your suspension cops more of a beating as there is less tyre profile to absorb some of the shock.

i own an R33 GTS, i was going to swap the axles over to 5 stud to get some good racing 18s (the wheels i am after are only available as 18s in 5 stud). i have been toying with the idea of keeping the 4 stud and getting the 17x8 versions instead. after reading this i think the 17s sound a lot better but i will be doing a turbo upgrade/swap later on - will i need to move to 5 stud and GTSt LSD anyway? in which case i'll just get the 5 stud 17s :rofl:

For a 33, there's not much need to go bigger than 17 x 8 simply because they have a good contact patch, is relatively cheap and they fill out the wheel wells fine.

Same for the 32.

The 34 does seem to look better with 18" rims.

T.

Hell yer .:rofl:

Also at the same time.. I thought by having slightly wider rear wheel will give slightly better tracktion? Since the gtst/gts25t/gtt are all rear wheel drive and all. :D Correct me if I'm wrong of course. :)

Well over the last week I have asked people left, right and centre (owners/tyre salesman/this forum/suspensionexperts) which way to go....

The core of it is... if you got the cash go the 18x8 and 18x9.

I drove both 17's and 18's this week on the same suspension set up (standard) and the ride is hardly different... after all it's just 5mm of side wall difference. I guess the real difference would be around tuning the suspension to suit the wheel size. Sports cars are full of comromise, this is just another one.

lwells 's post was on the mark... it's all about the contact patch.

Cheers

PB8

Rim size and how it performs really depends on the application and how they're set up, Formula 1 cars run 13's yet seem to go ok... don't ya think... They basically use the sidewall as suspension and run VERY hard suspension components to compensate... its down to personal taste and what it is your after, looks or performance and how you tune your suspension to match

18;s dont cost too much more than 17's... but you will take it in the arse with tire prices..... I dont know what 17" rubber goes for these days, but a few weeks ago got a nail through the sidewall on the 350z.. 1x18" tire cost $500 :(

If it was $350 bucks the difference for a new set of 18's (with tyres), which way would you go? I can't see the ride being that much worse as it's only going from a 245 to a 240 anyway.

Cheers

PB8

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...