Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ever noticed how much room there is between the upper suspension arm and a 17 inch wheel on a 33gtst, not a hell of a lot, i know 18s fit but i would love to know the clearence between said suspension arm and tire of 18 inch wheel.

if reasonably lowered (not to the shit either) + 18" rims + full lock turn.. you'll get rubbing.. which is not good for anything..

if you mainly use your car for nice cruising with the odd fang, you probably won't notice it and 18's are fine. If you push your car to its limits and find yourself locking the steering up on a regular basis, you're probably going to want 17's IMHO.

18in equipped and grinning!

My advice...(for what it's worth) go for the 18's!

Ride is not much stiffer (remember I swapped from 17 to 18 on the same car).

What is all the fuss about?... sounds like short man's syndrome to me:)

18's fit easy, ride is still great, car handles much better, tires are getting much cheaper as time goes on as they get more popular, the whole package was only a few hundred buck more than 17in option, backend feels 100% better, no rubbing, and to put a cherry on top they look way, WAY, better (265x35)...etc, etc.

Wheel choice is very limited though for 18x8 18x9 set up.

I appreciate all the advice and comments.

PB8

snake, youre meant to keep the same or similar rolling diameter, which means that if you have an 18" wheel, the sidewall of the tyre is shorter, giving the same or similar height as that of the 17" wheel/tyre package.  

nemz - sounds good mate.

Yes thats the theory, i havent had a good look at an 18 on a skyline with decent tread, but i have noticed on some other cars that go for bigger rims they still get a slightly larger rolling diameter, only slight

just use something like this calculator to make sure you're within 5% of the original diameter:

http://www.hgeconsulting.com.au/carspeed.xls

As for 17 v 18, I have both for my car and as said above, the 17 tyres are heaps cheaper.

One other advantage not mentioned yet is that generally the 17s are a fair bit lighter than 18s, unsprung weight degrades handling, not improves it....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, also, forgot to add these photos I believe.
    • Thought i'd update on this. I was able to get in contact with Craig Lieberman and later on Darryl Alison (owner of Kaizo Industries). Darryl was able to help me verify that my car was in fact one of theirs and is helping me find more info on mine !
    • There's restrictor pills in the stock boost control hoses. That's how they set the amount that was bled off and hence the "high" boost setting. The usual mod in the day was to remove it and send the "high" boost setting up to about 14 psi.
    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
×
×
  • Create New...