Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

big jump from 150 to 200..

At least you know better for next time.

I reckon you should have gone from 120 x 5 to 140 x 1, 160 x 1, 180 x 1

and if that was good speed, then maybe 185 x 1 and called it a night.

or maybe deficits for a few sets of 5 for assistance after the new PB

  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Fascinating, I've been wanting to get one of these done but haven't seen the results before. Very motivated now that I can see how much information it actually gives you. Interesting that one leg weighs nearly a kilo more than the other?

Don't know how you squat so much Mike, granted I only started squatting 6 months ago, but I die in the ass after 95 x 10. Are squats supposed to be harder for people with long legs? I hope so...

Don't know how you squat so much Mike, granted I only started squatting 6 months ago, but I die in the ass after 95 x 10. Are squats supposed to be harder for people with long legs? I hope so...

Leverages obviously will play a part in ones efficiency at the movement, but ultimately it just comes down to time and effort spent training.

You guys may think I'm strong compared to you, but remember I've been training for around 6 years and am very weak in comparison to dedicated lifters. To me, in the lifting circles I'm apart of, I am the weakest person out of everyone, and there are people with much much less training time who have far far far surpassed me because they have spent their training time better and smarter. It really comes down to how dedicated you want to be. If you are willing to make the sacrifices in lifestyle to ensure your diet is spot on 90+% the time, and you never miss training sessions and always put the effort in and get your recovery time, then you will succeed and go far beyond your mates who are very casual about lifting.

In terms of seeing if you are cut out to be elite or not, from what I gather, with bodybuilding it comes down to a 5 year window. If you are 100% dedicated with diet and training for 5 years, and you haven't reached pro, then you probably don't have the genetics to be a pro bodybuilder. With weight lifting, similar story except it's 10,000hrs of training. After 10,000hrs of training under total dedication, that's pretty much as good as you are going to get. 10,000hrs is the equivalent of a person starting training when 8-10yo and peaking when they're 18-20yo. Over the next 10 years, so by the time the lifter is 30, they will have made small improvements but nowhere near as much during their earlier years, and if they haven't made the Olympics then they don't have the genetics to be the best.

With that said, for the everyday person who has to hold down a job to put food on the table to support a wife and kids, it makes it near impossible to be totally dedicated, so for most of us who fall in this category we just have to do the best we can.

One of the favourite sayings I've heard is "the more I train the better my genetics get", which is so true. A lot of people use genetics as a cop out, but fact of the matter is if you keep doing something over and over you're going to get better at it. :)

Edited by GHOSTrun

To be honest it's only really your leg work that impresses me, not saying you're not doing well with the rest, but your legs are quite strong for your body weight. I'm basically an upper body verison of you at the moment lol.

Agree about dedication...I'm the only one in my group of friends who gets in the 4 sessions per week, rain/hail/shine...the rest come and go as they please and the results show. I'm the one breaking plateaus or staying at weights out of choice, they're the ones who have been stuck at the same weights for years and complaining about not getting past them.

Also agree about genetics. Without letting it prevent you from being the best you can be, it's important to acknowledge there are some limitations beyond those you create for yourself, beyond your control - dissonance from setting goals too high and not achieving them can be an issue for some. And yeah too many people are too quick to blame their genetics for where they are or where they aren't, when there's a long list of things they could improve before saying they've done all they can.

20 x 120... shit my legs hurt just reading that lol

I went 10 x 120 on Tue and was absolutely spent! I had to have a little sit down...

totally agree with your post above, you get out what you put in... you can see how much work you put into squatting and the results are there... also helps you surround yourself with really strong guys which keeps you hungry and pushing yourself

I really didn't want to go today but as I only train 3 x week I can't afford to miss a session... felt flat but went as hard as possible, just dropped the weight a bit... a average work out is better than none at all... and guess what, NOBODY in the gym today, was like a ghost town... if you can drag yourself there even when the weather is crap and you don't want to go outside thats more than half the battle won

the rest is being brave enough to fail... sometimes you will just put too much weight on the bar and miss... but you never know if you just go and do the same thing every time... who cares if you look like a tool... you won't look stupid when you can make that weight

keep it up... I come in here to motivate myself to squat lol

Hahahaha. I find the strongest (read: not necessarily the biggest) people at the gym are training on the 40+ degree days because that day happened to fall on one of their routine days :)

There's nothing more motivating to me than the extraneous variables trying to hold you back.

Ghosty is mentally strong too. or maybe just mental.

anyone who has tried 20 rep squats even with just body weight will know the pain in the arms, shoulders, back, the lower back.. my god the lower back pump pain...

the pins and needles, the shakes, the lungs.. lol

anytime I do 20s, I have to lie down afterwards.

just so draining.

Shame you're not doing Nats Ghosty.

Come and watch at least.

Gonna at least do bust-a-nut 2 in August?

Edited by TTT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...